Dataset Information

A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Most eukaryotic genes produce different transcripts of multiple isoforms by inclusion or exclusion of particular exons. The isoforms of a gene often play diverse functional roles, and thus it is necessary to accurately measure isoform expressions as well as gene expressions. While previous studies have demonstrated the strong agreement between mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and array-based gene and/or isoform quantification platforms (Microarray gene expression and Exon-array), the more recently developed NanoString platform has not been systematically evaluated and compared, especially in large-scale studies across different cancer domains.

Results

In this paper, we present a large-scale comparative study among RNA-seq, NanoString, array-based, and RT-qPCR platforms using 46 cancer cell lines across different cancer types. The goal is to understand and evaluate the calibers of the platforms for measuring gene and isoform expressions in cancer studies. We first performed NanoString experiments on 59 cancer cell lines with 404 custom-designed probes for measuring the expressions of 478 isoforms in 155 genes, and additional RT-qPCR experiments for a subset of the measured isoforms in 13 cell lines. We then combined the data with the matched RNA-seq, Exon-array, and Microarray data of 46 of the 59 cell lines for the comparative analysis.

Conclusion

In the comparisons of the platforms for measuring the expressions at both isoform and gene levels, we found that (1) the agreement on isoform expressions is lower than the agreement on gene expressions across the four platforms; (2) NanoString and Exon-array are not consistent on isoform quantification even though both techniques are based on hybridization reactions; (3) RT-qPCR experiments are more consistent with RNA-seq and Exon-array than NanoString in isoform quantification; (4) different RNA-seq isoform quantification methods show varying estimation results, and among the methods, Net-RSTQ and eXpress are more consistent across the platforms; and (5) RNA-seq has the best overall consistency with the other platforms on gene expression quantification.

SUBMITTER: Zhang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7106849 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.

Zhang Wei W Petegrosso Raphael R Chang Jae-Woong JW Sun Jiao J Yong Jeongsik J Chien Jeremy J Kuang Rui R

BMC genomics 20200330 1

<h4>Background</h4>Most eukaryotic genes produce different transcripts of multiple isoforms by inclusion or exclusion of particular exons. The isoforms of a gene often play diverse functional roles, and thus it is necessary to accurately measure isoform expressions as well as gene expressions. While previous studies have demonstrated the strong agreement between mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and array-based gene and/or isoform quantification platforms (Microarray gene expression and Exon-array), the ...[more]

PMID: 32228441

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundElectronic health records (EHR) are increasingly used for studying multimorbidities. However, concerns about accuracy, completeness, and EHRs being primarily designed for billing and administration raise questions about the consistency and reproducibility of EHR-based multimorbidity research.MethodsUtilizing phecodes to represent the disease phenome, we analyzed pairwise comorbidity strengths using a dual logistic regression approach and constructed multimorbidity as an undirected weighted graph. We assessed the consistency of the multimorbidity networks within and between two major EHR systems at local (nodes and edges), meso (neighboring patterns), and global (network statistics) scales. We present case studies to identify disease clusters and uncover clinically interpretable disease relationships. We provide an interactive web tool and a knowledge base combing data from multiple sources for online multimorbidity analysis.FindingsAnalyzing data from 500,000 patients across Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Mass General Brigham health systems, we observed a strong correlation in disease frequencies ( Kendall's τ = 0.643) and comorbidity strengths (Pearson ρ = 0.79). Consistent network statistics across EHRs suggest a similar structure of multimorbidity networks at various scales. Comorbidity strengths and similarities of multimorbidity connection patterns align with the disease genetic correlations. Graph-theoretic analyses revealed a consistent core-periphery structure, implying efficient network clustering through threshold graph construction. Using hydronephrosis as a case study, we demonstrated the network's ability to uncover clinically relevant disease relationships and provide novel insights.InterpretationOur findings demonstrate the robustness of large-scale EHR data for studying complex disease interactions. The alignment of multimorbidity patterns with genetic data suggests the potential utility for uncovering shared etiology of diseases. The consistent core-periphery network structure offers a strategic approach to analyze disease clusters. This work also sets the stage for advanced disease modeling, with implications for precision medicine.FundingVUMC Biostatistics Development Award, UL1 TR002243, R21DK127075, R01HL140074, P50GM115305, R01CA227481.

Dataset Information

A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.

Background

Results

Conclusion

Publications

A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets