Dataset Information

Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases.

ABSTRACT: Agnostic metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a promising single, universal pathogen detection method for infectious disease diagnostics. This methodology allows for identification and genomic characterization of bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses without the need for a priori knowledge of a specific pathogen directly from clinical specimens. Although there are increasing reports of mNGS successes, several hurdles need to be addressed, such as differentiation of colonization from infection, extraneous sources of nucleic acid, method standardization, and data storage, protection, analysis, and interpretation. As more commercial and clinical microbiology laboratories develop mNGS assays, it is important for treating practitioners to understand both the power and limitations of this method as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases.

SUBMITTER: Simner PJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7108102 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases.

Simner Patricia J PJ Miller Steven S Carroll Karen C KC

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20180201 5

Agnostic metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a promising single, universal pathogen detection method for infectious disease diagnostics. This methodology allows for identification and genomic characterization of bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses without the need for a priori knowledge of a specific pathogen directly from clinical specimens. Although there are increasing reports of mNGS successes, several hurdles need to be addressed, such as differentiation of colo ...[more]

PMID: 29040428

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe diagnosis of pulmonary infection and the identification of pathogens are still clinical challenges in immunocompromised patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a promising infection diagnostic technique. However, its diagnostic value in immunocompromised patients needs further exploration.PurposesThis study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of mNGS compared with comprehensive conventional pathogen tests (CTs) in the etiology of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 53 patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia from May 2019 to June 2021. There were 32 immunocompromised patients and 21 immunocompetent patients with pneumonia who received both mNGS and CTs. The diagnostic performance was compared between mNGS and CTs in immunocompromised patients, using the composite diagnosis as the reference standard. And, the diagnostic value of mNGS for mixed infections was further analyzed.ResultsCompared to immunocompetent patients, the most commonly pathogens, followed by Cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Klebsiella pneumoniae in immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, more mixed infections were diagnosed, and bacterial-fungal-virus coinfection was the most frequent combination (43.8%). mNGS can detect more types of pathogenic microorganisms than CTs in both groups (78.1% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.016and 57.1% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.048). The overall diagnostic positive rate of mNGS for pathogens was higher in immunocompromised patients (P = 0.002). In immunocompromised patients, a comparable diagnostic accuracy of mNGS and CTs was found for bacterial, fungal, and viral infections and coinfection. mNGS had a much higher sensitivity for bacterial infections (92.9% vs. 50%, P < 0.001) and coinfections (68.8% vs. 48.3%, P < 0.05), and it had no significant advantage in the detection of fungal infections, mainly due to the high sensitivity for Pneumocystis jirovecii in both groups.ConclusionmNGS is more valuable in immunocompromised patients and exhibits apparent advantages in detecting bacterial and mixed infections. It may be an alternative or complementary diagnostic method for the diagnosis of complicated infections in immunocompromised patients.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in sepsis and bloodstream infection (BSI).MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with sepsis and BSI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to February 2022 was conducted. All the patients underwent blood culture and were divided into mNGS group and non-mNGS group according to whether mNGS was performed or not. The mNGS group was further divided into early group (< 1 day), intermediate group (1-3 days), and late group (> 3 days) according to the time of mNGS inspection.ResultsIn 194 patients with sepsis and BSI, the positive rate of mNGS for identifying pathogens was significantly higher than that of blood culture (77.7% vs. 47.9%), and the detection period was shorter (1.41 ± 1.01 days vs. 4.82 ± 0.73 days); the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the mNGS group (n = 112) was significantly lower than that of the non-mNGS group (n = 82) (47.32% vs. 62.20%, p = 0.043). The total hospitalization time for the mNGS group was longer than that for the non-mNGS group (18 (9, 33) days vs. 13 (6, 23) days, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the ICU hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time, vasoactive drug use time, and 90-day mortality between the two groups (p > 0.05). Sub-group analysis of patients in the mNGS group showed that the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time in the late group were longer than those in the early group (30 (18, 43) days vs. 10 (6, 26) days, 17 (6, 31) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days), and the ICU hospitalization time in the intermediate group was longer than that in the early group (6 (3, 15) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days); the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the early group was higher than that of the late group (70.21% vs. 30.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001).ConclusionsmNGS has the advantages of a short detection period and a high positive rate in the diagnosis of pathogens causing BSI and, eventually, sepsis. Routine blood culture combined with mNGS can significantly reduce the mortality of septic patients with BSI. Early detection using mNGS can shorten the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time of patients with sepsis and BSI.

Project description:Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) versus conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) for pediatric pneumonia. Methods This retrospective observational study enrolled 103 children who were diagnosed with pneumonia and hospitalized at Hubei Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital between 15 October 2020 and 15 February 2022. The pneumonia diagnosis was based on clinical manifestations, lung imaging, and microbiological tests. Pathogens in the lower respiratory tract were detected using CMTs and BALF mNGS (of DNA and RNA). The diagnostic performance of BALF mNGS was compared with that of CMTs. Results In 96 patients, pathogens were identified by microbiological tests. The overall pathogen detection rate of mNGS was significantly higher than that of CMTs (91.3% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.000). The diagnostic performance of mNGS varied for different pathogens; however, its sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing bacterial and viral infections were both higher than those of CMTs (p = 0.000). For the diagnosis of fungi, the sensitivity of mNGS (87.5%) was higher than that of CMTs (25%); however, its specificity and accuracy were lower than those of CMTs (p < 0.01). For the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, the specificity (98.8%) and accuracy (88.3%) of mNGS were high; however, its sensitivity (42.1%) was significantly lower than that of CMTs (100%) (p = 0.001). In 96 patients with definite pathogens, 52 cases (50.5%) were infected with a single pathogen, while 44 cases (42.7%) had polymicrobial infections. Virus–bacteria and virus–virus co-infections were the most common. Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, rhinovirus, cytomegalovirus, parainfluenza virus, and fungi were more likely to be associated with polymicrobial infections. Conclusions BALF mNGS improved the detection rate of pediatric pneumonia, especially in mixed infections. The diagnostic performance of BALF mNGS varies according to pathogen type. mNGS can be used to supplement CMTs. A combination of mNGS and CMTs may be the best diagnostic strategy.

Dataset Information

Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases.

Publications

Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets