Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Efficacy and Safety Study of PF-05280586 (a Rituximab Biosimilar) Compared with Rituximab Reference Product (MabThera®) in Subjects with Previously Untreated CD20-Positive, Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL).


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Biosimilars are highly similar to the licensed biologic ("reference product"), with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency between the two products. OBJECTIVE:This comparative 52-week clinical study evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PF-05280586 (Ruxience™ [a rituximab biosimilar]) versus rituximab reference product sourced from the EU (MabThera®; rituximab-EU). PATIENTS AND METHODS:Subjects with CD20-positive, low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were randomized (1:1) to PF-05280586 or rituximab-EU (375 mg/m2 intravenously [once weekly for 4 weeks at days 1, 8, 15, and 22]), stratified using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 classification. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at week 26 (percentage of subjects achieving complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]). Therapeutic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in ORR between groups was within the prespecified margin (±?16%). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), CR rate, safety, immunogenicity, PK, and PD. RESULTS:A total of 394 subjects were randomized: PF-05280586 (n?=?196) or rituximab-EU (n?=?198). ORR at week 26 was 75.5% (PF-05280586) versus 70.7% (rituximab-EU), for a difference of 4.66%; 95% CI (-?4.16 to 13.47), which was entirely within the prespecified equivalence margin. Rates of CR were 29.3% (PF-05280586) versus 31.0% (rituximab-EU). Estimated 1-year PFS rates were 78.2% (95% CI 70.2-84.2) and 83.0% (95% CI 75.0-88.6) for PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU, respectively. Safety, immunogenicity, and mean serum concentrations were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:The efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, PK, and PD of PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU were similar up to week 52 in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive LTB-FL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213263 and EudraCT (2014-000132-41).

SUBMITTER: Sharman JP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7113218 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Efficacy and Safety Study of PF-05280586 (a Rituximab Biosimilar) Compared with Rituximab Reference Product (MabThera<sup>®</sup>) in Subjects with Previously Untreated CD20-Positive, Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL).

Sharman Jeff P JP   Liberati Anna Marina AM   Ishizawa Kenichi K   Khan Tahira T   Robbins Jeffery J   Alcasid Ann A   Rosenberg Julie Ann JA   Aurer Igor I  

BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy 20200401 2


<h4>Background</h4>Biosimilars are highly similar to the licensed biologic ("reference product"), with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency between the two products.<h4>Objective</h4>This comparative 52-week clinical study evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PF-05280586 (Ruxience™ [a rituximab biosimilar]) versus rituximab reference product sourced from the EU (MabThera<sup>®</sup>; rituximab-EU).<h4>Pa  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8295162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6221032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5099556 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4917800 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6512903 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8033751 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6290860 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9829503 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3776971 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9553375 | biostudies-literature