Dataset Information

The Pull Test: A Dynamic Test to Confirm Hip Microinstability.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:To define a distraction distance (pull length) cut-off that would differentiate those patients with hip microinstability and those without the disorder, called the Pull-Out Test. Methods:In total, 100 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included in the study. Patients were separated into a hip microinstability group (HMI) and non-hip microinstability group (NHI) based on the results of Beighton's score, the abduction-extension-external rotation test, hip extension-external rotation examination, and the prone instability test. Inclusion criteria were patients with an magnetic resonance imaging-proven labral tear who did not respond to conservative treatment and underwent hip arthroscopy. Exclusion criteria included those patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy, had a previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip, or had severe arthritis in the hip. The Pull-Out Test was performed before surgery with the hip in 30° of abduction and the foot in 30° of external rotation. A blinded examiner places gross axial traction on the leg until a firm end point is reached. The distraction distance between the femoral head and acetabulum is the pull length. Results:In total, 32 patients made up the HMI group whereas 68 patients were in the NHI group. The average pull length for the NHI group was 0.9 ± 0.1 cm and 1.7 ± 0.4 cm for the HMI group (P < .001). Subtracting the standard deviation from the HMI group average, when defined a cut off for hip microinstability as 1.3 cm. Using this value, we found the Pull-Out Test to have a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.96. The positive predictive value for the Pull Test was 0.91 and the negative predictive value 0.97. Conclusions:The Pull-Out Test is a useful test in identifying and confirming the presence of hip microinstability in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. A pull-length of 1.3 cm or greater is consistent with the presence of microinstability with a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 96%. Level of Evidence:Level IV, diagnostic, case-control study.

SUBMITTER: Economopoulos KJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7120831 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Pull Test: A Dynamic Test to Confirm Hip Microinstability.

Economopoulos Kostas J KJ Kweon Christopher Y CY Gee Albert O AO Morris Suzanne T ST Hassebrock Jeffrey D JD Chhabra Anikar A

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation 20191113 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>To define a distraction distance (pull length) cut-off that would differentiate those patients with hip microinstability and those without the disorder, called the Pull-Out Test.<h4>Methods</h4>In total, 100 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included in the study. Patients were separated into a hip microinstability group (HMI) and non-hip microinstability group (NHI) based on the results of Beighton's score, the abduction-extension-external rotation test, hip e ...[more]

PMID: 32266342

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study questionIs there concordance between hip pain and radiographic hip osteoarthritis?MethodsIn this diagnostic test study, pelvic radiographs were assessed for hip osteoarthritis in two cohorts: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study (community of Framingham, Massachusetts) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (a multicenter longitudinal cohort study of osteoarthritis in the United States). Using visual representation of the hip joint, participants reported whether they had hip pain on most days and the location of the pain: anterior, groin, lateral, buttocks, or low back. In the Framingham study, participants with hip pain were also examined for hip pain with internal rotation. The authors analysed the agreement between radiographic hip osteoarthritis and hip pain, and for those with hip pain suggestive of hip osteoarthritis they calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of radiographs as the diagnostic test.Study answer and limitationsIn the Framingham study (n=946), only 15.6% of hips in patients with frequent hip pain showed radiographic evidence of hip osteoarthritis, and 20.7% of hips with radiographic hip osteoarthritis were frequently painful. The sensitivity of radiographic hip osteoarthritis for hip pain localised to the groin was 36.7%, specificity 90.5%, positive predictive value 6.0%, and negative predictive value 98.9%. Results did not differ much for hip pain at other locations or for painful internal rotation. In the Osteoarthritis Initiative study (n=4366), only 9.1% of hips in patients with frequent pain showed radiographic hip osteoarthritis, and 23.8% of hips with radiographic hip osteoarthritis were frequently painful. The sensitivity of definite radiographic hip osteoarthritis for hip pain localised to the groin was 16.5%, specificity 94.0%, positive predictive value 7.1%, and negative predictive value 97.6%. Results also did not differ much for hip pain at other locations.What this study addsHip pain was not present in many hips with radiographic osteoarthritis, and many hips with pain did not show radiographic hip osteoarthritis. Most older participants with a high suspicion for clinical hip osteoarthritis (groin or anterior pain and/or painful internal rotation) did not have radiographic hip osteoarthritis, suggesting that in many cases, hip osteoarthritis might be missed if diagnosticians relied solely on hip radiographs.Funding, competing interests, data sharingSee the full paper on thebmj.com for funding. The authors have no competing interests. Additional data are available from bevochan@bu.edu.

Dataset Information

The Pull Test: A Dynamic Test to Confirm Hip Microinstability.

Publications

The Pull Test: A Dynamic Test to Confirm Hip Microinstability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets