Dataset Information

Quantitative assessment of the determinant structural differences between redox-active and inactive glutaredoxins.

ABSTRACT: Class I glutaredoxins are enzymatically active, glutathione-dependent oxidoreductases, whilst class II glutaredoxins are typically enzymatically inactive, Fe-S cluster-binding proteins. Enzymatically active glutaredoxins harbor both a glutathione-scaffold site for reacting with glutathionylated disulfide substrates and a glutathione-activator site for reacting with reduced glutathione. Here, using yeast ScGrx7 as a model protein, we comprehensively identified and characterized key residues from four distinct protein regions, as well as the covalently bound glutathione moiety, and quantified their contribution to both interaction sites. Additionally, we developed a redox-sensitive GFP2-based assay, which allowed the real-time assessment of glutaredoxin structure-function relationships inside living cells. Finally, we employed this assay to rapidly screen multiple glutaredoxin mutants, ultimately enabling us to convert enzymatically active and inactive glutaredoxins into each other. In summary, we have gained a comprehensive understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of glutaredoxin catalysis and have elucidated the determinant structural differences between the two main classes of glutaredoxins.

SUBMITTER: Liedgens L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7138851 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative assessment of the determinant structural differences between redox-active and inactive glutaredoxins.

Liedgens Linda L Zimmermann Jannik J Wäschenbach Lucas L Geissel Fabian F Laporte Hugo H Gohlke Holger H Morgan Bruce B Deponte Marcel M

Nature communications 20200407 1

Class I glutaredoxins are enzymatically active, glutathione-dependent oxidoreductases, whilst class II glutaredoxins are typically enzymatically inactive, Fe-S cluster-binding proteins. Enzymatically active glutaredoxins harbor both a glutathione-scaffold site for reacting with glutathionylated disulfide substrates and a glutathione-activator site for reacting with reduced glutathione. Here, using yeast ScGrx7 as a model protein, we comprehensively identified and characterized key residues from ...[more]

PMID: 32265442

Similar Datasets

Project description:Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we identified 2 prototypical regions that exhibit high or absent hypersensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, respectively. These regulatory active or inactive regions were examined in the lymphoblast cell line K562 by using high-throughput super-resolution microscopy. In both regions, we systematically measured the physical distance of 2 fluorescence in situ hybridization spots spaced by only 5 kb of DNA. Unexpectedly, the resulting distance distributions range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200-nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Monte Carlo simulations of a coarse-grained model of these chromatin regions based on published data of nucleosome occupancy in K562 cells were performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. There was no parameter set for the simulation model that can explain the microscopically measured distance distributions. Obviously, the chromatin state given by the strength of internucleosomal interaction, nucleosome occupancy, or amount of histone H1 differs from cell to cell, which results in the observed broad distance distributions. This large variability was not expected, especially in inactive regions. The results for the mechanisms for different distance distributions on this scale are important for understanding the contacts that mediate gene regulation. Microscopic measurements show that the inactive region investigated here is expected to be embedded in a more compact chromatin environment. The simulation results of this region require an increase in the strength of internucleosomal interactions. It may be speculated that the higher density of chromatin is caused by the increased internucleosomal interaction strength.

Dataset Information

Quantitative assessment of the determinant structural differences between redox-active and inactive glutaredoxins.

Publications

Quantitative assessment of the determinant structural differences between redox-active and inactive glutaredoxins.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets