Dataset Information

Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer.

ABSTRACT: There is increased interest in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guiding radiation therapy (RT) in the clinical setting. In this regard, preclinical studies can play an important role in understanding the added value of MRI in RT planning. In the present study, we developed and validated a clinically relevant integrated workflow for MRI-guided volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) in a VX2 rabbit neck tumor model of HNSCC. In addition to demonstrating safety and feasibility, we examined the therapeutic impact of MR-guided VMAT using a single high dose to obtain proof-of-concept and compared the response to conventional 2D-RT. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) provided excellent soft tissue contrast for accurate tumor segmentation for VMAT. Notably, MRI-guided RT enabled improved tumor targeting ability and minimal dose to organs at risk (OAR) compared to 2D-RT, which resulted in notable morbidity within a few weeks of RT. Our results highlight the value of integrating MRI into the workflow for VMAT for improved delineation of tumor anatomy and optimal treatment planning. The model combined with the multimodal imaging approach can serve as a valuable platform for the conduct of preclinical RT trials.

SUBMITTER: Rajab Bolookat E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7139631 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer.

Rajab Bolookat Eftekhar E Malhotra Harish H Rich Laurie J LJ Sexton Sandra S Curtin Leslie L Spernyak Joseph A JA Singh Anurag K AK Seshadri Mukund M

Cancers 20200301 3

There is increased interest in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for guiding radiation therapy (RT) in the clinical setting. In this regard, preclinical studies can play an important role in understanding the added value of MRI in RT planning. In the present study, we developed and validated a clinically relevant integrated workflow for MRI-guided volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) in a VX2 rabbit neck tumor model of HNSCC. In addition to demonstrating safety and feasibility, we examined th ...[more]

PMID: 32121562

Similar Datasets

Project description:This dosimetric study investigated the impact of multileaf collimators (MLC) leaf width in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancers (HNC), either with a "standard" simultaneously integrated boost technique (S-SIB) or with a "dose painting" SIB technique (DP-SIB). HNC patients were planned either with an S-SIB comprising three dose levels, from 56 to 70 Gy (16 patients), or with a DP-SIB comprising five dose levels, from 56 to 84 Gy (8 patients), in 35 fractions. Two VMAT plans were calculated for each SIB technique using two Elekta MLCs: MLCi2 with 10 mm leaf width and Beam Modulator (BM) with 4 mm leaf width. Dose distributions were evaluated by comparing doses on PTVs, main OARs, and healthy tissue, and by comparing conformation indexes. Treatment efficiencies were evaluated by comparing the number of monitor units and the number of needed arcs. Comparisons of the two MLCs depending on the two SIB techniques showed: i) Regarding PTVs: Dmean and D2% on lower doses PTV decreased respectively by 0.5 Gy (p = 0.01) and 0.9 Gy (p = 0.01) with BM than with MLCi2 for S-SIB; no significant difference was found for DP-SIB;ii) Regarding OARs: for spinal cord and brainstem, D2% decreased respectively by 1.2 Gy (p = 0.03) and 4.2 Gy (p = 0.04) with BM than with MLCi2 for S-SIB; for controlateral parotid, D50% decreased by 1.5 Gy (p = 0.01) with BM than with MLCi2 for S-SIB; iii) Regarding treatment efficiency: the number of monitor units was 44% (p = 0.00) and 51% (p = 0.01) higher with BM for S-SIB and DP-SIB, respectively. Two arcs were more frequently needed with BM to reach an acceptable dose distribution. This study demonstrated that Beam Modulator (4 mm leaf width) and MLCi2 (10 mm leaf width) MLCs from Elekta provided satisfactory dose distributions for treatment delivery with VMAT technique for complex HNC cases with standard and dose painting prescriptions. OAR sparing was better with BM, mainly for brainstem and spinal cord. However, delivery efficiency of VMAT plans was better with MLCi2.

Project description:This work is to show which is more relevant to cause local failures (LFs) due to patient setup uncertainty between the planning target volume (PTV) underdosage and the potential target underdosage subject to patient setup uncertainties in head and neck (H&N) cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Thirteen LFs in 10 H&N patients treated by VMAT were analyzed. Measures have been taken to minimize the chances of insufficient target delineation for these patients and the patients were clinically determined to have LF based on the PET/CT scan results by an experienced radiologist and then reviewed by a second experienced radiation oncologist. Two methods were used to identify the possible locations of LF due to underdosage: (a) examining the standard VMAT plan, in which the underdosed volume in the nominal dose distribution (UVN) was generated by subtracting the volumes receiving the prescription doses from PTVs, and (b) plan robustness analysis, in which in addition to the nominal dose distribution, six perturbed dose distributions were created by translating the CT iso-center in three cardinal directions by the PTV margin. The coldest dose distribution was represented by the minimum of the seven doses in each voxel. The underdosed volume in the coldest dose distribution (UVC) was generated by subtracting the volumes receiving the prescription doses in the coldest dose distribution from the volumes receiving the prescription doses in the nominal dose distribution. UVN and UVC were subsequently examined for spatial association with the locations of LF. The association was tested using the binominal distribution and the Fisher's exact test of independence. We found that of 13 LFs, 11 were associated with UVCs (P = 0.011), while three were associated with UVNs (P = 0.99). We concluded that the possible target underdosage due to patient setup uncertainties appeared to be a more relevant factor associated with LF in VMAT for H&N cancer than the compromised PTV coverage at least for the patients included in this study.

Dataset Information

Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer.

Publications

Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure