Dataset Information

Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine.

ABSTRACT: Background:The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications. Methods:This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB?=?784, nonliposomal bupivacaine?=?734). Patients were divided into two groups those who did receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB and those who did not receive liposome bupivacaine in their ISB. Medical records were individually reviewed for surgical procedure, block medications, complications related to the block or surgical procedure, phone calls to the healthcare system for issues related to opioids or pain within 3 and within 30 days, readmissions within 30 days, and emergency room visits for complications within 3 and 30 days. Results:There was no significant difference in the number of patients with surgical or anesthetic complications. Only phone calls for pain within 3 days were significantly different. The LB group had 3.2% of patients call compared to 5.6% in the nonliposomal bupivacaine group (aOR?=?1.71 (95% CI: 1.04-2.87), p=0.036). We found no significant difference in any of the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions:The use of LB in an ISB demonstrated no significant difference compared to nonliposomal bupivacaine in numbers of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions.

SUBMITTER: Hutchins JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7139877 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine.

Hutchins Jacob L JL Habeck Jason J Novaczyk Zac Z Campbell Richard R Creedon Christopher C Spartz Ellen E Richter Michael M Wolter Jeremy J Suryawanshi Gaurav G Kaizer Alexander A Berg Aaron A AA

Anesthesiology research and practice 20200327

<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of this study was to investigate if the addition of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to an interscalene block (ISB) had an effect on the number of patients with surgical- or block-related complications.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a single-center retrospective chart view performed by identifying patients who received an ISB from January 1, 2014, through April 26, 2018, at the University of Minnesota. 1,518 patients were identified who received an ISB (LB = 784, nonliposomal b ...[more]

PMID: 32280340

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInterscalene nerve catheters have been proven to be effective in managing pain after rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine is a newer approved therapy for use around the interscalene brachial plexus, but its analgesic efficacy has limited supporting data in various patient populations.Purpose/hypothesisThe purpose of this study was to investigate the quality of recovery after arthroscopic RCR in patients who received either single-injection interscalene liposomal bupivacaine or an interscalene peripheral nerve catheter. It was hypothesized that interscalene peripheral nerve catheters would provide more reliable analgesia and improved patient satisfaction 48 hours after surgery.Study designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.MethodsEnrolled were 93 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery at a single ambulatory surgery center between October 2020 and June 2021. Of these patients, 13 were lost to follow-up; thus, 80 patients were included in statistical analysis. One group of patients (n = 48) received a preoperative interscalene nerve block placed with 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mL 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine. The second group (n = 32) received a preoperative interscalene catheter with an initial bolus of 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and a 0.2% ropivacaine infusion by an elastomeric pump set at 10 mL/hr for 48 hours. The primary outcome was the difference between preoperative and 48-hour postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Secondary outcomes included visual analog pain scores, opioid use, and patient satisfaction. Complications and adverse effects were also noted. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze means and standard deviations for continuous endpoints; Fisher exact test was used to analyze counts and proportions for categorical endpoints.ResultsThe liposomal bupivacaine group had a mean reduction of 3.9 in their postoperative QoR-15 scores, and the catheter group had a mean reduction of 25.1 in their postoperative QoR-15 scores, indicating a significantly worse functional recovery period compared with liposomal bupivacaine within the first 48 hours (P < .001). Patients who received liposomal bupivacaine also had significantly lower pain scores on the second postoperative day, improved quality of sleep, and improved satisfaction with analgesia (P < .05 for all).ConclusionThe use of interscalene liposomal bupivacaine demonstrated significantly improved quality of recovery when compared with interscalene nerve catheter after RCR.

Project description:BackgroundCurrently available local anesthetics approved for single-injection peripheral nerve blocks have a maximum duration of <24 hours. A liposomal bupivacaine formulation (EXPAREL, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA), releasing bupivacaine over 96 hours, recently gained Food and Drug Administration approval exclusively for wound infiltration but not peripheral nerve blocks.MethodsBilateral single-injection femoral nerve blocks were administered in healthy volunteers (n = 14). For each block, liposomal bupivacaine (0-80 mg) was mixed with normal saline to produce 30 mL of study fluid. Each subject received 2 different doses, 1 on each side, applied randomly in a double-masked fashion. The end points included the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps femoris muscle and tolerance to cutaneous electrical current in the femoral nerve distribution. Measurements were performed from baseline until quadriceps MVIC returned to 80% of baseline bilaterally.ResultsThere were statistically significant dose responses in MVIC (0.09%/mg, SE = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.14, P = 0.002) and tolerance to cutaneous current (-0.03 mA/mg, SE = 0.01, 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02, P < 0.001), however, in the opposite direction than expected (the higher the dose, the lower the observed effect). This inverse relationship is biologically implausible and most likely due to the limited sample size and the subjective nature of the measurement instruments. While peak effects occurred within 24 hours after block administration in 75% of cases (95% CI, 43%-93%), block duration usually lasted much longer: for bupivacaine doses >40 mg, tolerance to cutaneous current did not return to within 20% above baseline until after 24 hours in 100% of subjects (95% CI, 56%-100%). MVIC did not consistently return to within 20% of baseline until after 24 hours in 90% of subjects (95% CI, 54%-100%). Motor block duration was not correlated with bupivacaine dose (0.06 hour/mg, SE = 0.14, 95% CI, -0.27 to 0.39, P = 0.707).ConclusionsThe results of this investigation suggest that deposition of a liposomal bupivacaine formulation adjacent to the femoral nerve results in a partial sensory and motor block of >24 hours for the highest doses examined. However, the high variability of block magnitude among subjects and inverse relationship of dose and response magnitude attests to the need for a phase 3 study with a far larger sample size, and that these results should be viewed as suggestive, requiring confirmation in a future trial.

Project description:BackgroundPeriarticular anesthesia (PAI) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) were 2 common type of pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus about PAI with LB shows better clinical outcome than FNB. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PAI with LB and FNB for patients prepared for TKA.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs from PubMed (1966-2017.2), EMBASE (1980-2017.2), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2017.2), Web of Science (1966-2017.2), and Chinese Wanfang database (1980-2017.2) were searched. Continuous outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24, 48, and 72 hours, total morphine consumption, length of hospital, and range of motion (ROM) were reported as the weighted mean difference with 95% and confidence interval (CI) and discontinuous outcomes (the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were presented as relative risk with 95% CI. Random-effects model was adopted to analyze the relevant data.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies with 2407 patients were eligible and finally included in this meta-analysis (LB = 1114, FNB = 1293). There was no significant difference between VAS at 24, 4, and 72 hours, ROM, and the occurrence of PONV between PAI with LB group versus FNB group (P > 0.05). Compared with the FNB group, PAI with LB was associated with a significant decrease in length of hospital stay by 0.43 day (MD = -0.43; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.27; P = 0.001) and the total dose of total morphine consumption by (MD = -29.32; 95% CI -57.55 to -1.09; P = 0.042).ConclusionsThe review of trials found that PAI with LB provided a significant beneficial effect over FNB in improving the pain or decreased the total morphine consumption in patients who underwent TKA. However, PAI with LB associated with less LOS than FNB. More high quality RCTs are still needed to identify the effects and optimal dose of LB for pain management after TKA.

Project description:WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC:WHAT THIS MANUSCRIPT TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Although some trials suggest benefits of liposomal bupivacaine, data on real-world use and effectiveness is lacking. This study analyzed the impact of liposomal bupivacaine use (regardless of administration route) on inpatient opioid prescription, resource utilization, and opioid-related complications among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasties with a peripheral nerve block. It was hypothesized that liposomal bupivacaine has limited clinical influence on the studied outcomes. METHODS:The study included data on 88,830 total knee arthroplasties performed with a peripheral nerve block (Premier Healthcare Database 2013 to 2016). Multilevel multivariable regressions measured associations between use of liposomal bupivacaine and (1) inpatient opioid prescription (extracted from billing) and (2) length of stay, cost of hospitalization, as well as opioid-related complications. To reflect the difference between statistical and clinical significance, a relative change of -15% in outcomes was assumed to be clinically important. RESULTS:Overall, liposomal bupivacaine was used in 21.2% (n = 18,817) of patients that underwent a total knee arthroplasty with a peripheral nerve block. Liposomal bupivacaine use was not associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in inpatient opioid prescription (group median, 253 mg of oral morphine equivalents, adjusted effect -9.3% CI -11.1%, -7.5%; P < 0.0001) and length of stay (group median, 3 days, adjusted effect -8.8% CI -10.1%, -7.5%; P < 0.0001) with no effect on cost of hospitalization. Most importantly, liposomal bupivacaine use was not associated with decreased odds for opioid-related complications. CONCLUSIONS:Liposomal bupivacaine was not associated with a clinically relevant improvement in inpatient opioid prescription, resource utilization, or opioid-related complications in patients who received modern pain management including a peripheral nerve block.

Dataset Information

Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine.

Publications

Patient Complications after Interscalene Block: A Retrospective Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets