Dataset Information

Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Open Aortic Repair with Suprarenal Clamping.

ABSTRACT: Objective: To investigate predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) following open aortic repair (OAR) requiring suprarenal clamping. Methods: The study included 833 nonhemodialysis patients who had undergone elective OAR (with suprarenal clamping, n=73; with infrarenal clamping, n=760). We evaluated AKI as defined by the criteria of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and compared in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. We also investigated the effects of AKI on outcomes, factors related to post-suprarenal clamping AKI, and efficacy of hypothermic renal perfusion (HRP) in the suprarenal clamping group. Results: For the suprarenal vs. infrarenal clamping group, in-hospital mortality was 0% (0/73) vs. 0.5% (4/760). The incidence of AKI was greater in the suprarenal clamping group (37% vs. 15%, P<0.001), and the hospital stay for patients with AKI was longer than for those patients without AKI (median, 21 days vs. 16 days; P=0.005). Renal ischemia time and bleeding volume >1,000?mL were associated with post-suprarenal clamping AKI. Renal ischemia time was longer with HRP (n=15) than without HRP (n=58) (median, 51?min vs. 33?min; P=0.011), and HRP did not decrease the incidence of AKI (40% vs. 36%; P=0.78). Conclusion: Prolonged renal ischemia and substantial intraoperative bleeding are associated with postoperative AKI following suprarenal clamping.

SUBMITTER: Yokoyama N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7140154 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Open Aortic Repair with Suprarenal Clamping.

Yokoyama Nobu N Nonaka Takao T Kimura Naoyuki N Sasabuchi Yusuke Y Hori Daijiro D Matsunaga Wataru W Fujimori Tomonari T Miyoshi Kosuke K Matsumoto Harunobu H Yamaguchi Atsushi A

Annals of vascular diseases 20200301 1

<b>Objective</b>: To investigate predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) following open aortic repair (OAR) requiring suprarenal clamping. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 833 nonhemodialysis patients who had undergone elective OAR (with suprarenal clamping, n=73; with infrarenal clamping, n=760). We evaluated AKI as defined by the criteria of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and compared in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. We also investigated the effects of AKI o ...[more]

PMID: 32273921

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Knowledge regarding the long-term outcomes of elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is increasing. However, data with greater than 10 years' follow-up remain sparse and are lacking from population-based studies. Objective:To determine the long-term outcomes of EVAR compared with open surgical repair (OSR) for elective treatment of AAA. Design, Setting, and Participants:This retrospective, population-based cohort study used linked administrative health data from Ontario, Canada, to identify all patients 40 years and older who underwent elective EVAR or OSR for AAA repair from April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2016, with follow-up terminating on March 31, 2017. A total of 17 683 patients were identified using validated procedure and billing codes and were propensity score matched. Analysis was conducted from June 26, 2018, to January 16, 2019. Exposures:Elective EVAR or OSR for AAA. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival, defined as being free of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; reintervention; and secondary rupture. Results:Among 17 683 patients who received elective AAA repairs (mean [SD] age, 72.6 [7.8] years; 14 286 [80.8%] men), 6100 (34.5%) underwent EVAR and 11 583 (65.5%) underwent OSR. From these patients, 4010 well-balanced propensity score-matched pairs of patients were defined, with a mean (SD) age of 73.0 (7.6) years and 6583 (82.1%) men. In the matched cohort, the mean (SD) follow-up was 4.4 (2.7) years, and maximum follow-up was 13.8 years. The overall median survival was 8.9 years. Compared with OSR, EVAR was associated with a higher survival rate up to 1 year after repair (91.0% [95% CI, 90.1%-91.9%] vs 94.0% [95% CI, 93.3%-94.7%]) and a higher major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival rate up to 4 years after repair (69.9% [95% CI, 68.3%-71.3%] vs 72.9% [95% CI, 71.4%-74.4%]). Cumulative incidence of reintervention was higher among patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR at the 7-year follow-up (45.9% [95% CI, 44.1%-47.8%] vs 42.2% [95% CI, 40.4%-44.0%]). Survival analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences in long-term survival, reintervention, and secondary rupture for patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested superior long-term major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival among patients who underwent EVAR compared with those who underwent OSR (32.6% [95% CI, 26.9%-38.4%] vs 14.1% [95% CI, 4.0%-30.4%]; stratified log-rank P < .001) during a maximum follow-up of 13.8 years. Conclusions and Relevance:Endovascular aortic repair was not associated with a difference in long-term survival during more than 13 years' maximum follow-up. The reasons for these findings will require studies to consider specific graft makes and models, adherence to instructions for use, and types and reasons for reintervention.

Project description:ObjectiveThe study objective was to assess the radiological properties of acute type A aortic dissection-related neurological injuries and identify predictors of neurological injury.MethodsOur single-center, retrospective, observational study included all patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair between January 1998 and December 2021. Multivariable analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of embolic lesions, watershed lesions, neurological injury, 30-day mortality, and late mortality.ResultsA total of 538 patients were included. Of these, 120 patients (22.3%) experienced postoperative neurological injury; 74 patients (13.8%) had postoperative stroke, and 36 patients (6.8%) had postoperative coma. The 30-day mortality was 22.7% in the neurological injury group versus 5.8% in the no neurological injury group (P < .001). We identified several independent predictors of neurological injury. Cerebral malperfusion (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.00), systemic hypotensive shock (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.43), and aortic arch replacement (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-8.08) predicted embolic lesions. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 5.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-15.42), previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio, 8.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-50.43), duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08), cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01), ascending aortic/arch cannulation (odds ratio, 5.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-17.12), and left ventricular cannulation (odds ratio, 17.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-188.01) predicted watershed lesions. Retrograde cerebral perfusion (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.84) had a protective effect against watershed lesions.ConclusionsIn this study, we demonstrated that the radiological features of neurological injury may be as important as clinical characteristics in understanding the pathophysiology and causality behind neurological injury related to acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Dataset Information

Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Open Aortic Repair with Suprarenal Clamping.

Publications

Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Open Aortic Repair with Suprarenal Clamping.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets