Project description:Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used to promote wound healing in a variety of settings, including as an adjunct to silver-impregnated dressings in the acute management of paediatric burns. Fluid aspirated by the NPWT system represents a potentially insightful research matrix for understanding the burn wound microenvironment and the biochemical mechanisms of action of NPWT. The aim of this study was to characterise the proteome of wound fluid collected using NPWT from children with small-area thermal burns. Samples were obtained as part of a randomised controlled trial investigating the clinical efficacy of adjunctive NPWT. They were compared with blister fluid specimens from paediatric burn patients matched according to demographic and injury characteristics. Protein identification and quantification were performed via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH) data-independent acquisition. Proteins and biological pathways which were unique or enriched in negative pressure fluid samples were evaluated using principal components, partial least squares-discriminant, and gene ontology enrichment analyses. Eight viable samples of NPWT fluid were collected and analysed with eight matched blister fluid samples. A total of 502 proteins were quantitatively profiled in the NPWT fluid, of which 444 (88.4%) were shared with blister fluid. Several proteins exhibited significant abundance differences between fluid types, with NPWT fluid showing a higher abundance of proteases matrix metalloprotease-9 and arginase-1, immune cell surface molecule low affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor III-A, actin-binding protein filamin-A, plasma protein alpha-2-macroglobulin, and haemoglobin subunit alpha. The results lend support to the hypothesis that NPWT augments wound healing through the modulation of factors involved in the inflammatory response, granulation tissue synthesis, and extracellular matrix maintenance.

Project description:BackgroundMassive subcutaneous emphysema can cause considerable morbidity with respiratory distress. To resolve this emphysema in short-term, negative pressure wound therapy could be applied as added treatment modality. However, its use is sparsely reported, and a variety of techniques are being described. This study provides a systematic review of the available literature on the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy as treatment for massive subcutaneous emphysema. In addition, our institutional experience is reported through a case-series.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for publications on the use of negative pressure wound therapy for subcutaneous emphysema following thoracic surgery, trauma or spontaneous pneumothorax. Moreover, patients treated at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively identified and analyzed.ResultsThe systematic review provided 10 articles presenting 23 cases. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity regarding the location of incision, creation of prepectoral pocket, and surgical safety margin. Also closed incision negative pressure wound therapy and PICO© device were discussed. Despite the apparent heterogeneity, all techniques provided favorable outcomes. No complications, reinterventions or recurrences were documented. Furthermore, retrospective data of 11 patients treated at our clinic demonstrated an immediate response to negative pressure wound therapy and a full remission of the subcutaneous emphysema at the end of negative pressure wound therapy. No recurrence requiring intervention or complications were observed.ConclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that negative pressure wound therapy, despite the varying techniques employed, is associated with an immediate regression of subcutaneous emphysema and full remission at the end of therapy. Given the relatively low sample size, no technique of choice could be identified. However, in general, negative pressure wound therapy appears to provide fast regression of subcutaneous emphysema and release of symptoms in all cases.

Project description:ImportanceNegative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an established treatment option, but there is no evidence of benefit for subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment (SAWHI).ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NPWT for SAWHI after surgery in clinical practice.Design, setting, and participantsThe multicenter, multinational, observer-blinded, randomized clinical SAWHI study enrolled patients between August 2, 2011, and January 31, 2018. The last follow-up date was June 11, 2018. The trial included 34 abdominal surgical departments of hospitals in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands, and 539 consecutive, compliant adult patients with SAWHI after surgery without fascia dehiscence were randomly assigned to the treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio stratified by study site and wound size using a centralized web-based tool. A total of 507 study participants (NPWT, 256; CWT, 251) were assessed for the primary end point in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population.InterventionsNegative pressure wound therapy and conventional wound treatment (CWT).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was time until wound closure (delayed primary closure or by secondary intention) within 42 days. Safety analysis comprised the adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included wound closure rate, quality of life (SF-36), pain, and patient satisfaction.ResultsOf the 507 study participants included in the modified ITT population, 287 were men (56.6%) (NPWT, 155 [60.5%] and CWT, 132 [52.6%]) and 220 were women (43.4%) (NPWT, 101 [39.5%] and CWT 119 [47.4%]). The median (IQR) age of the participants was 66 (18) years in the NPWT arm and 66 (20) years in the CWT arm. Mean time to wound closure was significantly shorter in the NPWT arm (36.1 days) than in the CWT arm (39.1 days) (difference, 3.0 days; 95% CI 1.6-4.4; P < .001). Wound closure rate within 42 days was significantly higher with NPWT (35.9%) than with CWT (21.5%) (difference, 14.4%; 95% CI, 6.6%-22.2%; P < .001). In the therapy-compliant population, excluding study participants with unauthorized treatment changes (NPWT, 22; CWT, 50), the risk for wound-related AEs was higher in the NPWT arm (risk ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.99-2.35).Conclusions and relevanceNegative pressure wound therapy is an effective treatment option for SAWHI after surgery; however, it causes more wound-related AEs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01528033.

Dataset Information

A case series of negative pressure wound therapy as a promising treatment in patients with burn injury.

Publications

A case series of negative pressure wound therapy as a promising treatment in patients with burn injury.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets