Dataset Information

Digital self-monitoring: Does adherence or association with outcomes differ by self-monitoring target?

ABSTRACT: Objective:Digital self-monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight is increasingly prescribed in behavioural weight loss programmes. This study determined if adherence rates or associations with outcomes differed according to self-monitoring target (ie, self-monitoring of eating versus physical activity versus weight). Methods:Participants in a 3-month, group-based weight loss programme were instructed to use an app to record food intake, wear a physical activity sensor, and use a wireless body weight scale. At post-treatment, weight loss was measured in clinic and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured by research-grade accelerometer. Results:Adherence to self-monitoring decreased significantly over time for eating and weight but not physical activity. Overall, adherence to self-monitoring of weight was lower than that of eating or physical activity. Greater adherence to self-monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight each predicted greater weight loss. Only greater adherence to self-monitoring of eating was associated with greater bouted minutes of MVPA. Conclusions:Findings from this study suggest that self-monitoring should be considered a target-specific behaviour rather than a unitary construct when conceptualizing adherence and association with treatment outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Butryn ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7156825 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Digital self-monitoring: Does adherence or association with outcomes differ by self-monitoring target?

Butryn Meghan L ML Godfrey Kathryn M KM Martinelli Mary K MK Roberts Savannah R SR Forman Evan M EM Zhang Fengqing F

Obesity science & practice 20191212 2

<h4>Objective</h4>Digital self-monitoring of eating, physical activity, and weight is increasingly prescribed in behavioural weight loss programmes. This study determined if adherence rates or associations with outcomes differed according to self-monitoring target (ie, self-monitoring of eating versus physical activity versus weight).<h4>Methods</h4>Participants in a 3-month, group-based weight loss programme were instructed to use an app to record food intake, wear a physical activity sensor, a ...[more]

PMID: 32313670

Similar Datasets

Project description:We developed spotted oligonucleotide arrays of the S. pyogenes SF370 (an M1 serotype) genome and compared the transcriptomes of streptococci that adhere to Detroit 562 human pharyngeal cells to non-adherent (“associated”) streptococci within the same experiment. We replicated experiments independently and used dye-swaps to incorporate biological and technical variation, biological replicate experiments. Following filtering and normalization, we analyzed data from four biological replicates with robust summary statistics, Bayesian statistics and permutation algorithms to identify genes differentially expressed with significance during pharyngeal cell adherence. This analysis identified 79 genes (4% of the genome) exhibiting statistically significant fold changes in expression (PF value < 0.05) during adherence from 1769 open reading frames represented on the array. The genes encoding several known virulence factors (e.g. cysteine protease SpeB and streptolysin O) were differentially expressed with significance; however, many were either never before associated with adherence (e.g. phage-encoded genes including speH), or of undefined function. Genes demonstrating up-regulation (n= 45) and down-regulation (n= 34) included virulence factors, prophage-encoded transcripts, metabolic genes and transcriptional regulators (Table 2). Undefined or hypothetical genes comprised 27% of differentially expressed genes (n= 21; 11 chromosomally-encoded, 10 phage-encoded). We conducted TaqMan (qRT-PCR) analysis of 11 differentially expressed genes to validate selected microarray hybridization results. We further analyzed the data with neighbor clustering, using a set of novel computational algorithms (termed “GenomeCrawler”) for evaluating bacterial microarray data, which couples the expression profiles of genes with their physical location on the chromosome. When applied to the microarray data from this study, neighbor clustering identified a greater number of differentially expressed genes, which facilitated the reconstruction of known multimeric proteins, complete metabolic pathways and intact virulence loci that would not have been possible without its application. These data sets and algorithms are freely available for download at www.rockefeller.edu/vaf. Keywords: Pharyngeal cell adherent vs. associated

Project description:BACKGROUND:Asthma is a chronic disease requiring effective self-management to control it and prevent mortality. The use of theory-informed digital interventions promoting asthma self-management is increasing. However, there is limited knowledge concerning how and to what extent psychological theory has been applied to the development of digital interventions, or how using theory impacts outcomes. OBJECTIVE:The study aimed to examine the use and application of theory in the development of digital interventions to enhance asthma self-management and to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-based interventions in improving adherence, self-management, and clinical outcomes. METHODS:Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched systematically using predetermined terms. Additional studies were identified by scanning references within relevant studies. Two researchers screened titles and abstracts against predefined inclusion criteria; a third resolved discrepancies. Full-text review was undertaken for relevant studies. Those meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Study outcomes were classified as medication adherence, self-management, asthma control, clinical markers of health, quality of life, other quality of life outcomes, and health care utilization. Effectiveness was calculated as an average outcome score based on the study's reported significance. The Theory Coding Scheme (TCS) was used to establish the extent to which each intervention had applied theory and which theoretical constructs or behavioral determinants were addressed. Associations between TCS scores and asthma outcomes were described within a narrative synthesis. RESULTS:Fourteen studies evaluating 14 different digital interventions were included in this review. The most commonly cited theories were Social Cognitive Theory, Health Belief Model, and Self-Efficacy Theory. A greater use of theory in the development of interventions was correlated with effective outcomes (r=.657; P=.01): only the 3 studies that met >60% of the different uses of theory assessed by the TCS were effective on all behavioral and clinical outcomes measured. None of the 11 studies that met ?60% of the TCS criteria were fully effective; however, 3 interventions were partially effective (ie, the intervention had a significant impact on some, but not all, of the outcomes measured). Most studies lacked detail on the theoretical constructs and how they were applied to the development and application of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest that greater use of theory in the development and application of digital self-management interventions for asthma may increase their effectiveness. The application of theory alone may not be enough to yield a successful intervention, and other factors (eg, the context in which the intervention is used) should be considered. A systematic approach to the use of theory to guide the design, selection, and application of intervention techniques is needed.

Dataset Information

Digital self-monitoring: Does adherence or association with outcomes differ by self-monitoring target?

Publications

Digital self-monitoring: Does adherence or association with outcomes differ by self-monitoring target?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure