Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Larkins NG
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7160055 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic (SSNS) syndrome in children has evolved surprisingly slowly since the ISKDC consensus over 50 years ago. From a move towards longer courses of corticosteroid to treat the first episode in the 1990s and 2000s, more recent large, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have unequivocally shown no benefit from an extended course, although doubt remains whether this applies across all age groups. With regard to prevention of relapses, daily ultra-low-dose prednisolone has recently been shown to be more effective than low-dose alternate-day prednisolone. Daily low-dose prednisolone for a week at the time of acute viral infection seems to be effective in the prevention of relapses but the results of a larger RCT are awaited. Recently, corticosteroid dosing to treat relapses has been questioned, with data suggesting lower doses may be as effective. The need for large RCTs to address the question of whether corticosteroid doses can be reduced was the conclusion of the authors of the recent corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children Cochrane update. This review summarizes development in thinking on corticosteroid use in SSNS and makes suggestions for areas that merit further scrutiny.
| S-EPMC7896825 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4089737 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundConventional meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of immunosuppressants for pediatric steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).ObjectiveTo conduct a network meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of available immunosuppressive agents in pediatric patients with SRNS.Study methodsMEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE were searched on January 2017. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The main outcomes analyzed were efficacy [number/portion with complete remission (CR), number/portion with partial remission (PR), and total number/portion in remission (TR)] and safety [adverse secondary event (ASE) rates].ResultsA meta-analysis of 18 RCTs showed that tacrolimus was more efficacious for achieving CR than intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), oral cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, chlorambucil, azathioprine, and plaebo/nontreatment (P/NT), and more efficacious than i.v. cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, and P/NT in terms of TR outcomes. Cyclosporin was associated with a greater CR rate than i.v. cyclophosphamide, MMF, oral cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, azathioprine, or P/NT, and associated with a greater TR rate than i.v. cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, or P/NT. MMF was found to be more efficacious than i.v. cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide in terms of TR.ConclusionsTacrolimus and cyclosporine may be preferred initial treatments for children with SRNS. MMF may be another option for this patient population. Further studies of the efficacy and safety of these three drugs in children with SRNS should be pursued.
| S-EPMC5641191 | biostudies-literature
Project description:GWAS on a cohort of European ancestry comprising 422 SSNS cases and 5,642 matched controls.
| EGAS00001003607 | EGA
Project description:BackgroundVariation in dose and duration of corticosteroids for childhood-onset steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome occurs worldwide, likely reflecting the evolving evidence on optimal dosing and variable severity of the disease observed between patients. We conducted a study to determine the associations between site, physician, and patient factors, and average daily corticosteroid dose and duration of therapy.MethodsData were derived from the Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) Project, an observational longitudinal study from 2013 to 2019 of children with nephrotic syndrome involving pediatric nephrologists in 11 sites across Canada. The primary outcome was average daily corticosteroid dose prescribed per episode of proteinuria, reported as mg/m2 prednisone equivalents. Secondary outcome was duration of treatment for each episode of proteinuria in days. Exposure variables were categorized into site-, physician-, and patient-level variables.ResultsIn total, 328 children, median age at enrollment of 4.3 years old (interquartile range [IQR], 3.6), participated and were followed for a median time of 2.62 years (IQR, 2.6). The observed variability in average daily corticosteroid dose and in duration of therapy was mostly attributed to the site where the patient was treated. Accounting for between patient, physician, and site differences, average daily corticosteroid dose decreased with increasing age (beta coefficient, -0.07; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -0.09 to -0.05], P<0.001). African and Indigenous ethnicity was associated with longer treatment duration compared with White patients (beta coefficient: African, 42.29, 95% CI, 7.85 to 76.73, P=0.02; Indigenous, 29.65, 95% CI, 2.79 to 56.52, P=0.03).ConclusionsWe found practice variation with respect to corticosteroid prescriptions across 11 Canadian sites, and that variation is mostly explained at the site level. Age and ethnicity are important factors to be considered, because they are significantly associated with the average corticosteroid dose and duration of therapy.
| S-EPMC8986050 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimThe aim was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of levamisole in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.MethodsNon-linear mixed effects modelling was performed on samples collected during a randomized controlled trial. Samples were collected from children who were receiving 2.5 mg kg(-1) levamisole (or placebo) orally once every other day. One hundred and thirty-six plasma samples were collected from 38 children from India and Europe and included in the analysis. A one compartment model described the data well.ResultsThe apparent clearance rate (CL/F) and distribution volume (V/F) were 44 l h(-1) 70 kg(-1) and 236 l 70 kg(-1) , respectively; estimated interindividual variability was 32-42%. In addition to allometric scaling of CL/F and V/F to body weight, we identified a significant proportional effect of age on CL/F (-10.1% per year). The pharmacokinetics parameters were not affected by gender, tablet strength or study centre. The median (interquartile range) maximum plasma concentration of levamisole was 438.3 (316.5-621.8) ng ml(-1) , and the median area under the concentration-time curve was 2847 (2267-3761) ng ml(-1) h. Median tmax and t½ values were 1.65 (1.32-2.0) h and 2.60 (2.06-3.65) h, respectively.ConclusionsHere, we present the first pharmacokinetic data regarding levamisole in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. The pharmacokinetic profile of levamisole in children was similar to findings reported in adults, although the elimination rate was slightly higher in children.
| S-EPMC4541972 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Glucocorticoid resistance complicates the treatment of ~20% of children with nephrotic syndrome, yet the molecular basis for resistance remains unclear. We generated the transcriptome profile by RNA sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes from children obtained both at initial nephrotic syndrome presentation and after ~7 weeks of glucocorticoid therapy to identify genes or a gene panel able to differentiate steroid sensitive from steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome. RNA -seq analysis was followed by in-silico algorithm-based approaches and subsequent biochemical analyses on relevant candidate gene with important roles in podocyte and glomerular pathophysiology, using both patient samples and experimental models of nephrotic syndrome and podocyte injury.
2021-02-16 | GSE145969 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundSteroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is associated with a relapsing-remitting course that can be stressful for parents. As little is known of parental distress at the first onset of SSNS, this study aims to describe parental distress and everyday problems in mothers and fathers of a child with newly diagnosed SSNS participating in a randomized controlled trial of levamisole added to corticosteroids.MethodsTo assess distress, the Distress Thermometer for Parents (DT-P) was used, which includes questions on distress (thermometer score 0-10, ≥ 4 "clinical distress") and presence of everyday problems in six domains: practical, social, emotional, physical, cognitive, and parenting. The DT-P was completed 4 weeks after the onset of SSNS. Total sum and individual items of everyday problems were compared with reference data from mothers and fathers of the Dutch general population.ResultsThere was no difference in clinically elevated parental distress between SSNS mothers (n = 37) and fathers (n = 25) and reference parents. Compared to reference fathers, fathers of a child with SSNS scored significantly higher on emotional problems (P = 0.030), while mothers experienced more parenting problems (P = 0.002). Regression analyses showed that lower parental age and having a girl with SSNS were significantly associated with more practical problems and higher distress thermometer scores, respectively.ConclusionsFour weeks after onset, SSNS mothers and fathers experience equal distress as reference parents. However, both parents endorsed significantly more everyday problems. Therefore, monitoring parental distress, even in the first weeks of the disease, could contribute to timely interventions and prevent worsening of problems.Clinical trial registryDutch Trial Register ( https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/27331 ). A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
| S-EPMC10584702 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The pathogenesis of childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome (NS), disparity in incidence of NS among races, and variable responses to therapies in children with NS have defied explanation to date. In the last 20 years over 50 genetic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) have been identified, and at least two disease loci for two pathologic variants of SRNS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and membranous nephropathy) have been defined. However, the genetic causes and risk loci for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) remain elusive, partly because SSNS is relatively rare and also because cases of SSNS vary widely in phenotypic expression over time. A recent study of a well-defined modest cohort of children with SSNS identified variants in HLA-DQA1 as a risk factor for SSNS. Here we review what is currently known about the genetics of SSNS and also discuss how recent careful phenotypic and genomic studies reinforce the role of adaptive immunity in the molecular mechanisms of SSNS.
| S-EPMC5276801 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNephrotic syndrome is the most common kidney disease in children worldwide. Our aim was to critically appraise the quality of recent Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) in children in addition to summarize and compare their recommendations.MethodsSystematic review of CPGs. We identified clinical questions and eligibility criteria and searched and screened for CPGs using bibliographic and CPG databases. Each included CPG was assessed by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE-II) instrument. We summarized the recommendations in a comparison practical table.ResultsOur search retrieved 282 citations, of which three CPGs were eligible and appraised: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012, Japan Society for Pediatric Nephrology (JSPN) 2014, and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2009. Among these, the overall assessment of two evidence-based CPGs scored > 70% (KDIGO and JSPN), which was consistent with their higher scores in the six domains of the AGREE II Instrument. In domain 3 (rigor of development), KDIGO, JSPN, and AAP scored 84%, 74%, and 41%, respectively. In domain 5 (applicability), they scored 22%, 16%, and 19%, respectively, and in domain 6 (editorial independence), they scored 94%, 65%, and 88%, respectively.ConclusionsThe methodological quality of the KDIGO CPG was superior, followed by JSPN and AAP CPGs with the relevant recommendations for use in practice.Systematic review registrationThe protocol was registered in the Center for Open Science (OSF) DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6QTMD and in the International prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020197511 .
| S-EPMC8112064 | biostudies-literature