Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A histomorphometric study on treated and untreated ceramic filled PEEK implants versus titanium implants: Preclinical in vivo study.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To investigate the osseo-integrative behavior of untreated (UCFP) and sandblasted ceramic filled PEEK (SCFP) implants in comparison with titanium implants through measurement of bone implant contact (BIC) and bone density (BD). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Nine implants from each type were inserted into 9 dogs in which every experimental dog received the three different implants in the lower border of the mandible. The animals were euthanized after 3 months and extracting bone blocks containing implants followed by blocks preparation for histological examinations. RESULTS:BIC and BD were significantly higher in titanium and SCFP compared with UCFP group (p = .007) and (p = .012), respectively. Aluminum blasting increased the bone ingrowth and bone implant contact when compared to machined surfaces of untreated PEEK implants. CONCLUSION:In conclusion, sandblasting with 110 µm aluminum oxide particles can be proposed as a suitable surface treatment that enhances hydrophilicity of CFP. Further in vivo animal studies are still needed to confirm the findings of this study.

SUBMITTER: El Awadly TA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7162379 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A histomorphometric study on treated and untreated ceramic filled PEEK implants versus titanium implants: Preclinical in vivo study.

El Awadly Tarek A TA   Wu Gang G   Ayad Mohamed M   Radi Iman A W IAW   Wismeijer Daniel D   Abo El Fetouh Hamdy H   Osman Reham B RB  

Clinical oral implants research 20191219 3


<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate the osseo-integrative behavior of untreated (UCFP) and sandblasted ceramic filled PEEK (SCFP) implants in comparison with titanium implants through measurement of bone implant contact (BIC) and bone density (BD).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Nine implants from each type were inserted into 9 dogs in which every experimental dog received the three different implants in the lower border of the mandible. The animals were euthanized after 3 months and extracting bone  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5598161 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5015710 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7029176 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4813156 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4836932 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7671275 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6901521 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7467557 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5216395 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9764282 | biostudies-literature