Dataset Information

Association of Dermatomyositis Sine Dermatitis With Anti-Nuclear Matrix Protein 2 Autoantibodies.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Reports on dermatomyositis (DM) sine dermatitis (DMSD) are scarce, and the concept of the disease has not been widely accepted.

Objective

To confirm the existence of DMSD, determine its prevalence, and characterize its serologic features.

Design, setting, and participants

This is a cohort study that reviewed clinical information, laboratory data, and muscle pathology slides from January 2009 to August 2019. We further assessed the follow-up data of 14 patients with DMSD. The median (interquartile range) follow-up period was 34 (16-64) months. Muscle biopsy samples, along with clinical information and laboratory data, were sent to a referral center for muscle diseases in Japan for diagnosis. Of patients whose myopathologic diagnosis was made at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry between January 2009 and August 2019, 199 patients were eligible for inclusion. These patients underwent full investigation for DM-specific autoantibodies (against transcriptional intermediary factor γ, Mi-2, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5, nuclear matrix protein 2 [NXP-2], and small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme ); however, 17 patients were excluded because their muscle fibers did not express myxovirus resistance protein A, a sensitive and specific marker of DM muscle pathology.

Main outcomes and measures

Diagnosis of DMSD was based on the absence of a skin rash at the time of muscle biopsy.

Results

Of the 182 patients, 93 were women (51%) and 46 were children (25%) (<18 years). Fourteen patients (8%) had DMSD and none were clinically diagnosed with DM. Among the 14 patients with DMSD, 12 (86%) were positive for anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies, while the remaining 2 were positive for anti-transcriptional intermediary factor γ and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies, respectively. Only 28% of patients (47 of 168) with a skin rash were positive for anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies, indicating a significant association between anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies and DMSD (86% [12 of 14] vs 28% [47 of 168]; P < .001). This association was also supported by multivariable models adjusted for disease duration (odds ratio, 126.47; 95% CI, 11.42-1400.64; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance

Dermatomyositis sine dermatitis does exist and accounts for 8% of patients with DM confirmed with muscle biopsy. Dermatomyositis sine dermatitis is significantly associated with anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies, which contrasts with anti-MDA5 DM, which is typically clinically amyopathic in presentation. It is essential to distinguish DMSD from other types of myositis because DM-specific therapies that are currently under development, including Janus kinase inhibitors, may be effective for DMSD.

SUBMITTER: Inoue M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7171574 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveMyositis-specific autoantibodies have defined distinct phenotypes of patients with juvenile myositis (JIIM). We assessed the frequency and clinical significance of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) autoantibody-associated JIIM in a North American registry.MethodsRetrospective examination of the characteristics of 35 JIIM patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies was performed, and differences from other myositis-specific autoantibody groups were evaluated.ResultsAnti-MDA5 autoantibodies were present in 35/453 (7.7%) of JIIM patients and associated with older age at diagnosis, and lower serum creatine kinase and aldolase levels. Patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies had more frequent weight loss, adenopathy, arthritis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and less frequent falling compared with anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1 (TIF1), anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) and myositis-specific autoantibody/myositis-associated autoantibody-negative patients. They had a different season of diagnosis and less frequent mechanic's hands and ILD compared with those with anti-synthetase autoantibodies. Anti-MDA5 patients received fewer medications compared with anti-TIF1, and corticosteroid treatment was shorter compared with anti-TIF1 and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 autoantibody groups. The frequency of remission was higher in anti-MDA5 than anti-synthetase autoantibody-positive JIIM. In multivariable analyses, weight loss, arthritis and arthralgia were most strongly associated with anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JIIM.ConclusionAnti-MDA5 JIIM is a distinct subset, with frequent arthritis, weight loss, adenopathy and less severe myositis, and is also associated with ILD. Anti-MDA5 is distinguished from anti-synthetase autoantibody-positive JIIM by less frequent ILD, lower creatine kinase levels and differing seasons of diagnosis. Anti-MDA5 has comparable outcomes, but with the ability to discontinue steroids more rapidly and less frequent flares compared with anti-TIF1 autoantibodies, and more frequent remission compared with anti-synthetase JIIM patients.