Dataset Information

Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC). The objective of the current phase 2 study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity between etoposide and cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced GEP-NEC. METHODS:Patients with advanced, poorly differentiated GEP-NEC randomly were assigned to receive EP or IP. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities. RESULTS:The planned size of the study population was 144 patients, but enrollment was terminated early at 66 patients because the premature analysis found similar responses in the 2 treatment arms. The ORRs of the EP and IP arms both were 42.4% (14 of 33 patients). The efficacy was similar for small cell NEC with EP or IP (63.2% and 61.5%, respectively; P = .61), whereas that of IP was slightly better in patients with non-small cell NEC (30% vs 14.3%; P = .42). The median progression-free survival was 6.4 months and 5.8 months, respectively, for the EP and IP arms (P = .81), and the median overall survival was 11.3 months and 10.2 months, respectively, for the EP and IP arms (P = .37). The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly higher in the EP arm compared with the IP arm (45.4% vs 12.1%; P = .002). Nonhematological toxicity was relatively mild and more frequent in the IP arm compared with the EP arm (54.5% vs 18.2%; P = .001). No toxicity-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS:The results of the current study demonstrated that IP is not inferior to EP, with comparable efficacy for poorly differentiated NEC of the digestive system. In addition, both regimens appear to be well tolerated with diverse toxicity profiles.

SUBMITTER: Zhang P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7186825 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 study.

Zhang Panpan P Li Jie J Li Jian J Zhang Xiaotian X Zhou Jun J Wang Xicheng X Peng Zhi Z Shen Lin L Lu Ming M

Cancer 20200501

<h4>Background</h4>Platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC). The objective of the current phase 2 study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity between etoposide and cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced GEP-NEC.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with advanced, poorly differentiated GEP-NEC randomly were assigned to receive EP or IP. The primary endpoint w ...[more]

PMID: 32293725

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: To report the rate of candidate actionable somatic mutations in patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and of other genetic alterations that may be associated with tumorigenesis. Methods: A phase II mutation targeted therapy trial was conducted in patients with advanced well-differentiated G1/G2 GEP-NET. Mutations found in the mTOR pathway-associated genes led to treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and were defined as actionable. Tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from GEP-NET were sequenced and compared with germline DNA, using the OncoVAR-NET assay, designed for hybrid capture sequencing of 500 tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Somatic variants were called and copy-number (CN) variant analysis was performed. Results: Thirty patients (14 small-intestine, 8 pancreatic, 3 unknown primary NET, and 5 of other primary sites) harbored 37 lesions (4 patients had DNA of multiple lesions sequenced). Only 2 patients with sporadic NET (n = 26) had an actionable mutation leading to treatment with everolimus. Driver somatic mutations were detected in 18 of 30 patients (21/37 lesions sequenced). In the remaining samples without a driver mutation, CN alterations were found in 11/16 tumors (10/12 patients), including CN loss of chromosome (Chr) 18 (P<.05), CN gain of Chr 5, and loss of Chr 13. CN losses in Chr 18 were more common in patients without driver mutations detected. Pronounced genetic heterogeneity was detected in patients with multiple lesions sequenced. Conclusion: Genome-wide DNA sequencing may identify candidate actionable genes and lead to the identification of novel target genes for advanced well-differentiated GEP-NET. Abbreviations: Chr = chromosome; CN = copy number; DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; GEP = gastro-enteropancreatic; MEN-1 = multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin; NET = neuroendocrine tumor; PFS = progression-free survival; PNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; SINET = small-intestine neuroendocrine tumor.

Project description:Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent the most common subtype of NETs. The incidence of all NETs, and specifically GEP NETs, has risen exponentially over the last three decades. Only within the past several years have these tumors been appropriately classified, allowing for meaningful drug development. Broadly, some of the most exciting drug classes being developed for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs include newer types of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or combinations which increase the potency of lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Dotatate, novel multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) and immunotherapy modalities, beyond checkpoint inhibitors, which seek to unleash the immune system against NETs. Specifically looking at newer types of PRRT, somatostatin receptor antagonists and alpha-emitter radionuclides each have demonstrated the ability to elicit greater DNA damage than 177Lu-Dotatate in preclinical models. Early clinical experiences with each of these agents suggest they may be more cytotoxic than 177Lu-Dotatate. Other approaches seeking to build upon the DNA damage created by 177Lu-Dotatate include combinations of PRRT with radiosensitizers such as heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors, chemotherapy combinations, and triapine. Many of these combinations have just begun to be tested clinically. With regards to novel RTKIs, some of the ones which have demonstrated potent cytoreductive potential include cabozantinib and lenvatinib. Other RTKIs which are further along the clinical development spectrum and have demonstrated benefit in randomized trials include surufatinib and pazopanib. And though single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in patients with GEP NETs, outside of certain biomarker selected subsets, somatostatin receptor-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and vaccines such as SurVaxM, which targets survivin, represent two means through which NET-directed immunity may be modulated. The potential of these agents, if clinically realized, will likely improve outcomes for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs.

Project description:: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms was reviewed and validated the crucial role of the proliferative rate. According to the WHO classification 2010, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of grade 1 or 2 in up to 84%, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in 6%-8%. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are of grade G. Recently, a proportion of neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified, calling for a new category, well-differentiated grade 3 NET (NET G-3). Studies that have reported the characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms have identified more well-differentiated NET G-3 than neuroendocrine carcinomas. The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. Treatment for NET G-3 is not standardized and is balanced between G-1/2 neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma treatments. In nonmetastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the European and American guidelines recommended a surgical resection for localized neuroendocrine neoplasm, irrespective of the tumor grading. In NET G-3, chemotherapy is the benchmark if the main treatment goal is reduction of the tumor mass, particularly if it would allow a secondary surgery. In the present work, we review the epidemiology and make recommendations for the management of NET G-3.Neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified and named well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3). The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. The prognosis is worse than that for NET G-2. In nonmetastatic NET G-3, surgery appeared to be the first option. The chemotherapy regimen in pancreatic NET G-3 should be in line with that implemented in NET G-1/2 when the Ki-67 index is below 55% and should be in line with that implemented for neuroendocrine carcinoma when Ki-67 is above 55%.

Dataset Information

Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 study.

Publications

Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets