Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
Methods:Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with STEMI and met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2018 in our center were retrospectively included in this cohort study. The primary endpoint events were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including heart failure, sudden cardiac death, malignant arrhythmia, thrombi and bleeding events during the period of admission. Secondary endpoint events were components of MACEs. At the same time, we also evaluated angina pectoris at admission and discharge through Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading.
Results:This study enrolled 417 STEMI patients and divided them into four groups (PCI??7?days, 34.29%; MED, 29.74%). During the period of admission, MACEs occurred in 52 cases. The incidence of MACEs was 11.29, 7.95, 4.20 and 25.81% in the four respective groups (p?
Conclusions:In the real world, delayed PCI can be more effective in patients with angina symptoms at discharge and reduce the incidence of MACEs and cardiac death during hospitalization. The timing of intervention was independent of the occurrence of MACEs during hospitalization and of improvement in symptoms.
SUBMITTER: Guo Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7189551 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Guo Qixin Q Huang Jinyu J Shen Yong Y Tong Guoxin G Li Hong H Meng Shasha S
BMC cardiovascular disorders 20200428 1
<h4>Background</h4>Early reperfusion of the coronary artery has become the first choice for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). How to deal with patients who miss the time window for early reperfusion is still controversial. Based on real-world data, this study was conducted to explore whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has an advantage over standard drug therapy in patients who miss the optimal treatment window.<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutive patients who ...[more]