Dataset Information

Starting the Conversation: Initial Listening and Identity Approaches to Community Cultural Wellness.

ABSTRACT: Inclusion of multiple viewpoints increases when teams are diverse and provides value in scientific communication and discovery. To promote retention and raise the critical mass of underrepresented persons in science, all voices must be heard "at the table" to include "ways of knowing" outside the dominant institutional culture. These community-based inclusive concepts promote hearing all diverse perspectives for inclusive recognition of deeper socio-historical cultural wealth-collectively termed cultural wellness. When undergraduates and graduates in active-learning groups in class, or faculty collaborative teams on campus, start a project too quickly on task, opportunities are missed to be inclusive. While beginning a larger science project, we, student and faculty co-authors, first addressed this challenge -the need for greater inclusion of diverse perspectives-by starting a conversation. Here, we share ideas from our inclusive process. Based on social constructivist theories of co-constructing learning interpersonally, we co-mentored each other, learning from one another in community. We experientially considered how to inclusively collaborate across a demographically, geographically, and structurally heterogeneous group including multiple academic tiers from multiple ethnic backgrounds, cultural experiences, and institutions. Through an asset-based process grounded in several frameworks, we documented our introduction process of listening deeply, being mindful of identities including invisible cultural identities, recognizing each other with mutual respect, applying inclusive practices, and developing mutual trust and understanding. Building community takes time. Initial conversations can, and should, go deeper than mere introductions to build trust beyond social norms for relationships promoting cultural wellness.

SUBMITTER: Smith-Keiling BL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7195164 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Starting the Conversation: Initial Listening and Identity Approaches to Community Cultural Wellness.

Smith-Keiling Beverly L BL Sharma Archana A Fagbodun Sheritta M SM Chahal Harsimranjit K HK Singleton Keyaira K Gopalakrishnan Hari H Paleologos Katrina E KE Brantley Jayla J Nguyen Vy V Mathew Mahesh M van de Ligt Amanda J AJ

Journal of microbiology & biology education 20200410 1

Inclusion of multiple viewpoints increases when teams are diverse and provides value in scientific communication and discovery. To promote retention and raise the critical mass of underrepresented persons in science, all voices must be heard "at the table" to include "ways of knowing" outside the dominant institutional culture. These community-based inclusive concepts promote hearing all diverse perspectives for inclusive recognition of deeper socio-historical cultural wealth-collectively termed ...[more]

PMID: 32431769

Similar Datasets

Project description:Despite introduction of Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in Malawi over a decade ago, preterm birth remains the leading cause of neonatal mortality. Although KMC is initiated in the health care facility, robust community follow-up is critical for survival and optimal development of preterm and low birth weight infants post-discharge. The objective of this qualitative study was to gain insight into community and health worker understanding, attitudes, beliefs and practices around preterm and low birth weight babies and KMC in Malawi.A total of 152 participants were interviewed in two districts in southern Malawi, Machinga and Thyolo, in April 2015. Focus group discussions (groups = 11, n = 132) were conducted with pregnant women, community members and women who have practiced KMC. In-depth interviews (n = 20) were conducted with fathers who have practiced KMC, community and religious leaders, and health workers. Purposive and snowball sampling were employed to identify participants. Thematic content analysis was conducted.KMC mothers and fathers only learned about KMC and care for preterm newborns after delivery of a child in need of this care. Men typically were not included in KMC counseling due to societal gender roles. Health facilities were the main source of information on KMC, however informal networks among women provided some degree of knowledge exchange. Community leaders were regarded as major facilitators of health information, conveners, key influencers, and policy-makers. Religious leaders were regarded as advocates and emotional support for families with preterm infants. Finally, while many participants initially had negative feelings towards preterm births and KMC, the large majority saw a shift in their perceptions through health counseling, peer modeling, and personal success with KMC.The findings offer several opportunities to improve KMC implementation including 1) earlier introduction of KMC to pregnant women and their families that are at-risk for preterm birth, 2) greater involvement of men in KMC counselling, practice and care for preterm infants, and 3) strengthening and defining partnerships with community and religious leaders. Finally, as parental perceptions of preterm infants and KMC improved with successful KMC practice, it is hopeful that KMC itself can positively affect social norms surrounding preterm infants, leading to a virtuous cycle of improved perceptions of preterm infants and increased uptake of KMC.

Project description:Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a rare genetic condition caused by inborn error(s) in the gene for the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. Resulting loss of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism requires strict dietary therapy and/or medication to prevent toxic accumulation of Phe. Novel investigational therapies, including gene therapies that aim to address underlying causes of PKU, are now entering clinical trials. However, perceptions of this technology in the PKU community have not been assessed. We conducted a qualitative survey recruiting adult patients, caregivers, and patient advocates from the US and 3 EU countries to assess the impact of living with PKU and the perceptions of gene therapy. Telephone interviews were conducted for up to 60 min following a standardized discussion guide. Interviewers classified each participant by their level of knowledge regarding gene therapy as either: low (little or no prior awareness); moderate (awareness of gene therapy as a concept in PKU); or high (working knowledge of gene therapy, e.g., vectors). In total, 33 participants were recruited (patients, n = 24; caregivers, n = 5; advocates, n = 4). The patient sample was well balanced among age groups, sex, and US/EU geographies. The participants' experiences and burden of living with PKU were largely negative, characterized by frustrations with current management consistent with prior reports. Most participants (n = 18/33) were identified as displaying moderate gene-therapy knowledge, 10/33 as displaying high knowledge, and 5/33 as displaying low knowledge. Both positive and negative perceptions were observed; positive perceptions were often linked to "hope" that gene therapy may represent a cure, whereas negative perceptions were linked to the "uncertainty" of outcomes. High knowledge of gene therapy appeared to trend with negative perceptions; 7/10 participants from this group reported high levels of concern over gene therapy. In contrast, participants who displayed low knowledge reported low (n = 3/5) or moderate (n = 2/5) concern, with predominantly positive perceptions. These data highlight the need for education around the theoretical risk:benefit profile of gene therapy. Despite current unknowns around gene therapy, our study demonstrates the important role of healthcare providers as educators who can use available data to provide balanced information to patients and caregivers.

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials aim to draw conclusions about the effects of treatments, but a trial can address many different potential questions. For example, does the treatment work well for patients who take it as prescribed? Or does it work regardless of whether patients take it exactly as prescribed? Since different questions can lead to different conclusions on treatment benefit, it is important to clearly understand what treatment effect a trial aims to investigate-this is called the 'estimand'. Using estimands helps to ensure trials are designed and analysed to answer the questions of interest to different stakeholders, including patients and public. However, there is uncertainty about whether patients and public would like to be involved in defining estimands and how to do so. Public partners are patients and/or members of the public who are part of, or advise, the research team. We aimed to (i) co-develop a tool with public partners that helps explain what an estimand is and (ii) explore public partner's perspectives on the importance of discussing estimands during trial design.MethodsAn online consultation meeting was held with 5 public partners of mixed age, gender and ethnicities, from various regions of the UK. Public partner opinions were collected and a practical tool describing estimands, drafted before the meeting by the research team, was developed. Afterwards, the tool was refined, and additional feedback sought via email.ResultsPublic partners want to be involved in estimand discussions. They found an introductory tool, to be presented and described to them by a researcher, helpful for starting a discussion about estimands in a trial design context. They recommended storytelling, analogies and visual aids within the tool. Four topics related to public partners' involvement in defining estimands were identified: (i) the importance of addressing questions that are relevant to patients and public in trials, (ii) involving public partners early on, (iii) a need for education and communication for all stakeholders and (iv) public partners and researchers working together.ConclusionsWe co-developed a tool for researchers and public partners to use to facilitate the involvement of public partners in estimand discussions.

Project description:BackgroundWhile COVID-19 has had far-reaching consequences on society and health care providers, there is a paucity of research exploring frontline emergency medicine (EM) provider wellness over the course of a pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess the well-being, resilience, burnout, and wellness factors and needs of EM physicians and advanced practice providers (e.g., nurse practitioners and physician assistants; APPs) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA descriptive, prospective, cohort survey study of EM physicians and APPs was performed across ten emergency departments in a single state, including academic and community settings. Participants were recruited via email to complete four weekly, voluntary, anonymous questionnaires comprised of customized and validated tools for assessing wellness (Well Being Index), burnout (Physician Work Life Study item), and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) during the initial acceleration phase of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate analysis with Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact, and logistic regression was performed.ResultsOf 213 eligible participants, response rates ranged from 31 to 53% over four weeks. Women comprised 54 to 60% of responses. Nonrespondent characteristics were similar to respondents. Concern for personal safety decreased from 85 to 61% (p < 0.001). Impact on basic self-care declined from 66 to 32% (p < 0.001). Symptoms of stress, anxiety, or fear was initially 83% and reduced to 66% (p = 0.009). Reported strain on relationships and feelings of isolation affected > 50% of respondents initially without significant change (p = 0.05 and p = 0.30 respectively). Women were nearly twice as likely to report feelings of isolation as men (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.82-5.88). Working part-time carried twice the risk of burnout (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.10-5.47). Baseline resilience was normal to high. Provider well-being improved over the four weeks (30 to 14%; p = 0.01), but burnout did not significantly change (30 to 22%; p = 0.39).ConclusionThis survey of frontline EM providers, including physicians and APPs, during the initial surge of COVID-19 found that despite being a resilient group, the majority experienced stress, anxiety, fear, and concerns about personal safety due to COVID-19, putting many at risk for burnout. The sustained impact of the pandemic on EM provider wellness deserves further investigation to guide targeted interventions.

Dataset Information

Starting the Conversation: Initial Listening and Identity Approaches to Community Cultural Wellness.

Publications

Starting the Conversation: Initial Listening and Identity Approaches to Community Cultural Wellness.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets