Dataset Information

Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased body mass index (BMI) negatively affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among gestational carriers. METHODS:A retrospective matched case-control cohort, including all gestational carrier (GC) cycles performed at CReATe Fertility Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2003 and 2016. SETTING:A Canadian fertility clinic, with a large surrogacy program. PATIENTS:All gestational carriers that had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer at our clinic, and had BMI and outcome data available, were matched by BMI to infertile patients treated at our clinic during the same years provided they had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer, and had outcomes data available. INTERVENTIONS:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Clinical pregnancies rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates. RESULTS:BMI was not a reliable prediction factor of any of the measured outcomes. Importantly, the gestational carrier population had better outcomes and a significantly lower overall incidence of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications when compared with infertile patients, treated at our clinic during the same years. CONCLUSION:BMI is not a reliable predictor of outcomes among gestational carriers.

SUBMITTER: Fuchs Weizman N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7195786 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers.

Fuchs Weizman Noga N Defer Miranda K MK Montbriand Janice J Pasquale Julia M JM Silver Adina A Librach Clifford L CL

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 20200502 1

<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased body mass index (BMI) negatively affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among gestational carriers.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective matched case-control cohort, including all gestational carrier (GC) cycles performed at CReATe Fertility Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2003 and 2016.<h4>Setting</h4>A Canadian fertility clinic, with a large surrogacy program.<h4>Patients</h4>All gestational carriers t ...[more]

PMID: 32359356

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To study the association of prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain with child neurodevelopmental outcomes. METHODS:We performed a secondary analysis of data from two parallel, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled thyroxine replacement trials in pregnant women with either hypothyroxinemia or subclinical hypothyroidism who delivered at term. Body mass index was categorized as normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), or obese (30 or greater). We also evaluated early (20 weeks of gestation or less), late (greater than 20 weeks of gestation), and total gestational weight gain and categorized gestational weight gain as inadequate, adequate, and excessive per 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines. Neurodevelopmental outcomes included 5-year Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence and 3-year Differential Ability Scales-II. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed and adjusted for maternal age, race-ethnicity, education, insurance status, parity, smoking and alcohol use, thyroid status (subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia), treatment group, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal sex. RESULTS:Of the 948 women included, 380 (40%), 305 (32%), and 263 (28%) had normal, overweight, and obese prepregnancy BMI, respectively. A total of 106 (11%), 212 (22%), and 630 (66%) of women had inadequate, adequate, and excessive total rates of gestational weight gain, respectively. Maternal differences among the BMI categories included race-ethnicity, education, insurance type, parity, and thyroid status (all P<.01), whereas the gestational weight gain groups only differed by parity (P<.001). In unadjusted analysis, children of obese (93.2±12.8; 88.5±13.3) and overweight (94.1±15.6; 89.6±16.0) women had lower Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence and Differential Ability Scales-II scores, respectively, than normal-weight women (97.4±15.4; 93.9±16.0; P<.001 for all comparisons); however, in adjusted analysis, there were no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes by maternal BMI. The association was primarily accounted for by race-ethnicity and education. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes by adequacy of early, late, or total gestational weight gain. CONCLUSION:In women with either subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia, neither prepregnancy BMI nor gestational weight gain was associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes among children born at term in adjusted analyses.

Project description:IntroductionTo date, there have only been provisional recommendations about the appropriate gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies. This study aimed to contribute evidence to this gap of knowledge.Material and methodsUsing a cohort of 10 603 twin pregnancies delivered between 2000 and 2015 in the state of Hessen, Germany, the individual and combined impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on maternal and neonatal outcomes was analyzed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression models. The analysis used newly defined population-based quartiles of gestational weight gain in women carrying twin pregnancies (Q1: <419.4 g/week [low weight gain], Q2-Q3: 419.4-692.3 g/week [optimal weight gain], Q4: >692.3 g/week [high weight gain]) and the World Health Organization body mass index classification.ResultsPre-pregnancy body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 was associated with significantly increased rates of cesarean deliveries (aOR1.2, 95% CI: 1.01-1.41) and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders (aOR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.11-2.1) but not with any adverse neonatal outcome. Perinatal mortality (aOR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.38-3.6), preterm birth (aOR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.58-2.25), APGAR'5 < 7 (aOR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.19-2.17) and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (aOR 1.6, CI: 1.38-1.85) were increased among women with low gestational weight gain. Rates of cesarean deliveries were high in both women with low (aOR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.05-1.48) and high gestational weight gain (aOR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35). A high gestational weight gain was also associated with higher rates of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (aOR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.79-3.02) and postpartum hemorrhage (aOR 1.72, 95%CI: 1.12-2.63). The risk of preterm birth, low Apgar scores and NICU admissions showed a converse linear relation with pre-pregnancy body mass index in women with low gestational weight gain.ConclusionsIn twin pregnancies, nonoptimal weekly maternal weight gain seems to be strongly associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Since gestational weight gain is a modifiable risk factor, health care providers have the opportunity to counsel pregnant women with twins and target their care accordingly. Additional research to confirm the validity and generalizability of our findings in different populations is warranted.

Dataset Information

Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers.

Publications

Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets