Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses.


ABSTRACT: Purpose:Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting. Methods:A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used: (A) "PET" OR "positron emission tomography" AND (B) "lung" OR "pulmonary" OR "pleur?" AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected. Results:We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) 18F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if 18F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown. Conclusions:Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Lococo F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7196984 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses.

Lococo Filippo F   Muoio Barbara B   Chiappetta Marco M   Nachira Dania D   Petracca Ciavarella Leonardo L   Margaritora Stefano S   Treglia Giorgio G  

Contrast media & molecular imaging 20200425


<h4>Purpose</h4>Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Libr  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7463824 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5221689 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7184819 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7359199 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5587306 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4781771 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6533224 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3726297 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7527542 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5945029 | biostudies-literature