Dataset Information

Heterogeneous Dielectric Implicit Membrane Model for the Calculation of MMPBSA Binding Free Energies.

ABSTRACT: Membrane-bound protein receptors are a primary biological drug target, but the computational analysis of membrane proteins has been limited. In order to improve molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA) binding free energy calculations for membrane protein-ligand systems, we have optimized a new heterogeneous dielectric implicit membrane model, with respect to free energy simulations in explicit membrane and explicit water, and implemented it into the Amber software suite. This new model supersedes our previous uniform, single dielectric implicit membrane model by allowing the dielectric constant to vary with depth within the membrane. We calculated MMPBSA binding free energies for the human purinergic platelet receptor (P2Y12R) and two of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M2R and M3R) bound to various antagonist ligands using both membrane models, and we found that the heterogeneous dielectric membrane model has a stronger correlation with experimental binding affinities compared to the older model under otherwise identical conditions. This improved membrane model increases the utility of MMPBSA calculations for the rational design and improvement of future drug candidates.

SUBMITTER: Greene D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7197397 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Heterogeneous Dielectric Implicit Membrane Model for the Calculation of MMPBSA Binding Free Energies.

Greene D'Artagnan D Qi Ruxi R Nguyen Remy R Qiu Tianyin T Luo Ray R

Journal of chemical information and modeling 20190613 6

Membrane-bound protein receptors are a primary biological drug target, but the computational analysis of membrane proteins has been limited. In order to improve molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA) binding free energy calculations for membrane protein-ligand systems, we have optimized a new heterogeneous dielectric implicit membrane model, with respect to free energy simulations in explicit membrane and explicit water, and implemented it into the Amber software suite. This ...[more]

PMID: 31145610

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate yet efficient computational models of solvent environment are central for most calculations that rely on atomistic modeling, such as prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed generalized Born implicit solvent model, GBNSR6 (Aguilar et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 3613-3639), in estimating the electrostatic solvation free energies (ΔG(pol)) and binding free energies (ΔΔG(pol)) for small protein-ligand complexes. We also compare estimates based on three different explicit solvent models (TIP3P, TIP4PEw, and OPC). The two main findings are as follows. First, the deviation (RMSD = 7.04 kcal/mol) of GBNSR6 binding affinities from commonly used TIP3P reference values is comparable to the deviations between explicit models themselves, e.g. TIP4PEw vs TIP3P (RMSD = 5.30 kcal/mol). A simple uniform adjustment of the atomic radii by a single scaling factor reduces the RMS deviation of GBNSR6 from TIP3P to within the above "error margin" - differences between ΔΔG(pol) estimated by different common explicit solvent models. The simple radii scaling virtually eliminates the systematic deviation (ΔΔG(pol)) between GBNSR6 and two out of the three explicit water models and significantly reduces the deviation from the third explicit model. Second, the differences between electrostatic binding energy estimates from different explicit models is disturbingly large; for example, the deviation between TIP4PEw and TIP3P estimates of ΔΔG(pol) values can be up to ∼50% or ∼9 kcal/mol, which is significantly larger than the "chemical accuracy" goal of ∼1 kcal/mol. The absolute ΔG(pol) calculated with different explicit models could differ by tens of kcal/mol. These discrepancies point to unacceptably high sensitivity of binding affinity estimates to the choice of common explicit water models. The absence of a clear "gold standard" among these models strengthens the case for the use of accurate implicit solvation models for binding energetics, which may be orders of magnitude faster.

Dataset Information

Heterogeneous Dielectric Implicit Membrane Model for the Calculation of MMPBSA Binding Free Energies.

Publications

Heterogeneous Dielectric Implicit Membrane Model for the Calculation of MMPBSA Binding Free Energies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets