Dataset Information

Structural and Dynamical Signatures of Local DNA Damage in Live Cells.

ABSTRACT: The dynamic organization of chromatin inside the cell nucleus plays a key role in gene regulation and genome replication, as well as maintaining genome integrity. Although the static folded state of the genome has been extensively studied, dynamical signatures of processes such as transcription or DNA repair remain an open question. Here, we investigate the interphase chromatin dynamics in human cells in response to local DNA damage, specifically, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Using simultaneous two-color spinning-disk confocal microscopy, we monitor the DSB dynamics and the compaction of the surrounding chromatin, visualized by fluorescently labeled 53BP1 and histone H2B, respectively. Our study reveals a surprising difference between the mobility of DSBs located in the nuclear interior versus periphery (less than 1 μm from the nuclear envelope), with the interior DSBs being almost twice as mobile as the periphery DSBs. Remarkably, we find that the DSB sites possess a robust structural signature in a form of a unique chromatin compaction profile. Moreover, our data show that the DSB motion is subdiffusive and ATP-dependent and exhibits unique dynamical signatures, different from those of undamaged chromatin. Our findings reveal that the DSB mobility follows a universal relationship defined solely by the physical parameters describing the DSBs and their local environment, such as the DSB focus size (represented by the local accumulation of 53BP1), DSB density, and the local chromatin compaction. This suggests that the DSB-related repair processes are robust and likely deterministic because the observed dynamical signatures (DSB mobility) can be explained solely by their structural features (DSB focus size, local chromatin compaction). Such knowledge might help in detecting local DNA damage in live cells, as well as in aiding our biophysical understanding of genome integrity in health and disease.

SUBMITTER: Eaton JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7202935 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDisulfide bonds are traditionally considered to play only structural roles. In recent years, increasing evidence suggests that the disulfide proteome is made up of structural disulfides and reversible disulfides. Unlike structural disulfides, reversible disulfides are usually of important functional roles and may serve as redox switches. Interestingly, only specific disulfide bonds are reversible while others are not. However, whether reversible disulfides can be predicted based on structural information remains largely unknown.MethodsIn this study, two datasets with both types of disulfides were compiled using independent approaches. By comparison of various features extracted from the local structural signatures, we identified several features that differ significantly between reversible and structural disulfides, including disulfide bond length, along with the number, amino acid composition, secondary structure and physical-chemical properties of surrounding amino acids. A SVM-based classifier was developed for predicting reversible disulfides. RESULTS: By 10-fold cross-validation, the model achieved accuracy of 0.750, sensitivity of 0.352, specificity of 0.953, MCC of 0.405 and AUC of 0.751 using the RevSS_PDB dataset. The robustness was further validated by using RevSS_RedoxDB as independent testing dataset. This model was applied to proteins with known structures in the PDB database. The results show that one third of the predicted reversible disulfide containing proteins are well-known redox enzymes, while the remaining are non-enzyme proteins. Given that reversible disulfides are frequently reported from functionally important non-enzyme proteins such as transcription factors, the predictions may provide valuable candidates of novel reversible disulfides for further experimental investigation.ConclusionsThis study provides the first comparative analysis between the reversible and the structural disulfides. Distinct features remarkably different between these two groups of disulfides were identified, and a SVM-based classifier for predicting reversible disulfides was developed accordingly. A web server named RevssPred can be accessed freely from: http://biocomputer.bio.cuhk.edu.hk/RevssPred .

Project description:Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious DNA lesions a cell can encounter. If left unrepaired, DSBs harbor great potential to generate mutations and chromosomal aberrations. To prevent this trauma from catalyzing genomic instability, it is crucial for cells to detect DSBs, activate the DNA damage response (DDR), and repair the DNA. When stimulated, the DDR works to preserve genomic integrity by triggering cell cycle arrest to allow for repair to take place or force the cell to undergo apoptosis. The predominant mechanisms of DSB repair occur through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) (reviewed in). There are many proteins whose activities must be precisely orchestrated for the DDR to function properly. Herein, we describe a method for 2- and 3-dimensional (D) visualization of one of these proteins, 53BP1. The p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) localizes to areas of DSBs by binding to modified histones, forming foci within 5-15 minutes. The histone modifications and recruitment of 53BP1 and other DDR proteins to DSB sites are believed to facilitate the structural rearrangement of chromatin around areas of damage and contribute to DNA repair. Beyond direct participation in repair, additional roles have been described for 53BP1 in the DDR, such as regulating an intra-S checkpoint, a G2/M checkpoint, and activating downstream DDR proteins. Recently, it was discovered that 53BP1 does not form foci in response to DNA damage induced during mitosis, instead waiting for cells to enter G1 before localizing to the vicinity of DSBs. DDR proteins such as 53BP1 have been found to associate with mitotic structures (such as kinetochores) during the progression through mitosis. In this protocol we describe the use of 2- and 3-D live cell imaging to visualize the formation of 53BP1 foci in response to the DNA damaging agent camptothecin (CPT), as well as 53BP1's behavior during mitosis. Camptothecin is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that primarily causes DSBs during DNA replication. To accomplish this, we used a previously described 53BP1-mCherry fluorescent fusion protein construct consisting of a 53BP1 protein domain able to bind DSBs. In addition, we used a histone H2B-GFP fluorescent fusion protein construct able to monitor chromatin dynamics throughout the cell cycle but in particular during mitosis. Live cell imaging in multiple dimensions is an excellent tool to deepen our understanding of the function of DDR proteins in eukaryotic cells.

Dataset Information

Structural and Dynamical Signatures of Local DNA Damage in Live Cells.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets