Dataset Information

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Role of PD-L1 in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Background: A series of studies have explored the prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC); however, the results are controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to estimate the associations between PD-L1 expression and the prognosis and clinicopathological features of EC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted up until September 06, 2019. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were computed using the random-effects model (REM) or fixed-effects model (FEM). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the relationship between PD-L1 and clinicopathological factors. Results: A total of 9 studies with 1,615 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The combined data showed that high expression of PD-L1 was not significantly correlated with OS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.41-3.52, p = 0.737) or PFS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.50-2.54, p = 0.778) in EC. In addition, PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with poor differentiation (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.96-4.06, P < 0.001) and advanced stage (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.12-2.60, p = 0.013). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that PD-L1 expression is not associated with poor prognosis in patients with EC. However, PD-L1 expression is positively correlated with poor differentiation and advanced tumor stage in EC.

SUBMITTER: Lu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7203339 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Role of PD-L1 in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Lu Ling L Li Yonghong Y Luo Rong R Xu Junhui J Feng Jie J Wang Mingqiang M

Frontiers in oncology 20200430

<b>Background:</b> A series of studies have explored the prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC); however, the results are controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to estimate the associations between PD-L1 expression and the prognosis and clinicopathological features of EC. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted up until September 06, 2019. Pooled hazard ratios ...[more]

PMID: 32426281

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Recently, blockade of immune checkpoint has emerged as one of the most potential treatments for solid tumors. Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1), a member of the B7 family of molecules, plays a crucial role in tumor immunobiology. However, the prognostic significance of PD-L1 in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to inquire into the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in CCA via a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to April 2019, regardless of the region or language, for studies on the correlation between clinicopathology/prognosis and PD-L1 in patients with CCA. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to investigate the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. The odds ratios (ORs) were also determined to explore the association between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 11 studies with 1,066 patients. The meta-analysis of these studies indicated a trend that high PD-L1 expression indicated a poor OS, but the result was not statistically significant (HR = 1.62, 95% CI [0.98-2.68], p = 0.063). For DFS, although the pooled result is not statistically significant, it trends toward being significant that high PD-L1 expression indicated improved DFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.62, 1.04], p = 0.092). In subgroup analyses, the results were not consistent across the subgroups that were divided based on the publication year (before 2018: HR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.34-2.75], p < 0.001; after 2018: HR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.70-2.89], p = 0.335). Moreover, PD-L1 expression in TCs significantly correlated with the AJCC TNM stage of CCA (OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.27, 0.99], p = 0.09). Conclusion: Our meta-analyses revealed that PD-L1 expressed in TCs was significantly correlated with the AJCC TNM stage of CCA. Based on the included studies, we found that PD-L1 indeed expressed in both TCs and ICs in CCA patients, raising the possibility of the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for CCA patients. In contrast, expression of PD-L1 did not seem to be associated with patient outcome in our study. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in CCA demands further investigation.

Project description:BackgroundA series of studies has investigated the prognostic role and clinical significance of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results were inconsistent. We aimed to clarify the prognostic role of PD-L1 and relationship between PD-L1 expression and several important clinicopathological features.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index Expanded were systematically searched. All cohort or case-control studies comparing the prognosis and clinical features between the high PD-L1 and low PD-L1 groups were included. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Begg's test. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed.ResultsSeventeen studies including 2979 patients were eligible. The overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.65: P = 0.07) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 81%). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (HR: 1.22; 95% CI 0.97-1.53; P = 0.09) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 78%). The expression of PD-L1 was found to be significantly correlated with alpha-fetoprotein, hepatitis history, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Begg's test found no significant publication bias for OS and RFS. Sensitivity analysis established the robustness of our results. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis found the region of research as a significant contributor to inter-study heterogeneity in RFS, indicating some racial differences in the prognostic role of PD-L1.ConclusionsOur study found no significant prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC patients after potential curative hepatectomy based on our included studies. The expression of PD-L1 was significantly correlated with AFP, hepatitis history, and TILs. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC warrants further investigation.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN:Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS:Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS:4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Dataset Information

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Role of PD-L1 in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Role of PD-L1 in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets