Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Proposal for the User-Centered Design Approach for Health Apps Based on Successful Experiences: Integrative Review.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Different strategies encompassed within mHealth have shown themselves to be effective for maintaining good health or controlling certain diseases. However, there is usually a very high rate of abandonment of health apps. Therefore, it would seem obvious that there is a need for involving the end users (whether they are health professionals, patients, or both) in the design process from the early stages in order to enable their needs and characteristics to be identified. In this sense, it is common knowledge that focusing on the user permits the consideration of valuable details aimed at making the correct adjustment between the patient, the technology, and the organization of attention.

Objective

The goal of the research was to propose a methodology based on the review of previous successful user experiences in setting up health apps by using qualitative techniques (focus groups and discussion groups) that includes the participation of information technology and health professionals and the patients themselves.

Methods

An integrative review was made of studies in which a qualitative methodology was employed mainly through focus and/or discussion groups for the design and development of health apps, consulting diverse databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Proquest) with the following search strategy: "mHealth AND apps AND focus group OR discussion group." A total of 69 papers were included in the review.

Results

A proposal structured in 4 sessions of variable duration was made in which information technology and health professionals and patients take part: composing, preparing, and organizing contents (session 1); testing structure and usability (session 2); does the app fit the needs of end users? (session 3); and last testing-keep on improving (session 4). Throughout the sessions, we propose studying aspects like previous user experiences in mHealth, barriers to the adoption of mHealth, interface contents, management and browsability, usability, perceived quality, security and privacy, capacity to self-manage disease with the app, ergonomics, and glanceability, etc. Specific tools that have proved useful in previous research for measuring these aspects are presented.

Conclusions

These work sessions would be based on predominantly qualitative methodologies although, as they evolve, validated questionnaires permitting the assessment of the objectivity of certain technical aspects could be incorporated. With this proposal, a project centered on end users could be effected, responding to their needs. However, this requires validation that will be made via implementation in the development of health apps, with the subsequent measurement of results in terms of adherence and improvement in the clinical variables of the end users.

SUBMITTER: Molina-Recio G 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7203616 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Proposal for the User-Centered Design Approach for Health Apps Based on Successful Experiences: Integrative Review.

Molina-Recio Guillermo G   Molina-Luque Rafael R   Jiménez-García Ana M AM   Ventura-Puertos Pedro E PE   Hernández-Reyes Alberto A   Romero-Saldaña Manuel M  

JMIR mHealth and uHealth 20200422 4


<h4>Background</h4>Different strategies encompassed within mHealth have shown themselves to be effective for maintaining good health or controlling certain diseases. However, there is usually a very high rate of abandonment of health apps. Therefore, it would seem obvious that there is a need for involving the end users (whether they are health professionals, patients, or both) in the design process from the early stages in order to enable their needs and characteristics to be identified. In thi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7840279 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4876999 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7929751 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6530259 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11193079 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8322510 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7615187 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7455872 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10750233 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4464901 | biostudies-literature