Dataset Information

The Efficacy and Safety of Qiming Granule for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common complication in clinical practice. Qiming granule, a traditional Chinese patent medicine, is widely used in treating DED in China. However, its effect is still largely unknown.

Objectives

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QG on DED.

Methods

Three English database and four Chinese databases without restriction on language and publication bias were searched. Qualified literature was selecting according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and conducted a meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 11 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included studies was low. The results showed that QG was effective for DED (RR:1.26, 95%CI:1.12 to 1.41, P=0.0001). The results combined with random effects model showed that QG could significantly prolong the tear film break up time (MD: 2.93, 95% CI: 2.22 to 3.65, P < 0.00001), increase the amount of tears in patients with DED (MD: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.83 to 4.04, P < 0.00001) and repair the corneal defects in patients (MD: -0.71, 95% CI: -1.25 to -0.17, P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

This study found that despite of the apparently positive results of some outcomes, it is premature to confirm the efficacy of QG in treating DED. More high-quality studies are still needed in the future to further confirm the efficacy and safety.

SUBMITTER: Yang M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7204435 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Efficacy and Safety of Qiming Granule for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yang Maoyi M Hu Zhipeng Z Yue Rensong R Yang Liangjun L Zhang Boxun B Chen Yuan Y

Frontiers in pharmacology 20200430

<h4>Background</h4>Dry eye disease (DED) is a common complication in clinical practice. Qiming granule, a traditional Chinese patent medicine, is widely used in treating DED in China. However, its effect is still largely unknown.<h4>Objectives</h4>This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QG on DED.<h4>Methods</h4>Three English database and four Chinese databases without restriction on language and publication bias were searched. Qualified literature was selecting according to in ...[more]

PMID: 32425798

Similar Datasets

Project description:Vancomycin and teicoplanin are the glycopeptides currently in use for the treatment of infections caused by invasive beta-lactam-resistant gram-positive organisms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that have compared vancomycin and teicoplanin administered systemically for the treatment of suspected or proven infections. A comprehensive search of trials without year, language, or publication status restrictions was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by using the fixed-effect model (RRs of >1 favor vancomycin). Twenty-four trials were included. All-cause mortality was similar overall (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21), and there was no significant heterogeneity. In trials that used adequate allocation concealment, the results favored teicoplanin (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.06), while in trials with unknown methods or inadequate concealment, the results favored vancomycin (RR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.27 to 10.30). The latter trials might have recruited more severely ill patients. No other variable affected the RRs for mortality, including the assessment of glycopeptides administered empirically or for proven infections, neutropenia, the participant's age, and drug dosing. There were no significant differences between teicoplanin and vancomycin with regard to clinical failure (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.05), microbiological failure (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.65), and other efficacy outcomes. Lower RRs (in favor of teicoplanin) for clinical failure were observed with a lower risk of bias and when treatment was initiated for infections caused by gram-positive organisms rather than empirically. Total adverse events (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.74), nephrotoxicity (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.61), and red man syndrome were significantly less frequent with teicoplanin. Teicoplanin is not inferior to vancomycin with regard to efficacy and is associated with a lower adverse event rate than vancomycin.

Project description:ObjectiveThe purpose of this article is to systematically review the association between dry eye and sleep quality.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and grey literature databases were searched for observational studies published before April 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using STAT15 software.ResultsA total of 21 studies with 419,218 participants were included. The results showed that the dry eye subjects had a worse sleep quality than the healthy population, with poorer subjective sleep quality, longer sleep latency, and a higher risk of unhealthy sleep duration such as insufficient sleep or excessive sleep. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores of the dry eye subjects were significantly higher than those of the control subjects (WMD = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.06, 2.50, P < 0.001). The dry eye subjects scored higher than the control subjects in sleep quality, sleep latency, and sleep disturbance in PSQI; there was no difference between the dry eye individuals and control subjects in sleep duration, sleep efficiency, daytime dysfunction, and sleep medication scores. The risk of sleep disorders in the dry eye subjects was significantly higher than that in the non-dry eye subjects (RR = 2.20, 95%CI: 1.78, 2.72, P < 0.001); the risk of insufficient sleep in the dry eye subjects was higher than that in the control subjects (RR = 3.76, 95%CI: 3.15, 4.48, P < 0.001), and the prevalence of excessive sleepiness in dry eye subjects was higher than that in the control subjects (RR = 5.53, 95%CI: 3.83, 7.18, P < 0.001). The ESS scores of the dry eye subjects were significantly higher than those of the control subjects (WMD = 3.02, 95%CI: 2.43, 3.60, P < 0.01).ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggests that individuals with dry eye have a worse sleep quality than the healthy population, with poorer subjective sleep quality, longer sleep latency, and higher risk of unhealthy sleep duration such as insufficient sleep or excessive sleepiness.

Dataset Information

The Efficacy and Safety of Qiming Granule for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Efficacy and Safety of Qiming Granule for Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets