Dataset Information

A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery have demonstrated beneficial effects on postoperative complications, return of bowel function, length of stay, and costs, without increasing readmissions or mortality. However, ERPs were not specifically designed for older patients and feasibility in older patients has been questioned. AIM:The aim of this study was to assess ERP adherence and outcomes in older patients and to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and prolonged length of stay. METHOD:Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (?70 years) undergoing elective colorectal resection in a tertiary referral hospital in 2017. RESULTS:Ninety-six patients were included. Adherence rates were above 80% in 18 of 21 ERP interventions considered. The lowest adherence rates were noted for preoperative carbohydrate loading and cessation of intravenous fluids. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ?2) and prolonged postoperative length of stay (>75th percentile) were observed in 39.6% and 26.3%, respectively. Median length of stay was 7 days. The 30-day mortality, readmission and reoperation rates were 2.1%, 12.6% and 8.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that polypharmacy and site of surgery were independent risk factors for postoperative complications, while higher age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative length of stay. CONCLUSION:ERP adherence in older patients undergoing colorectal resection is high and ERP is therefore considered feasible. Postoperative complications and prolonged postoperative length of stay are common, so at risk patients should be targeted with tailored geriatric interventions.

SUBMITTER: Fagard K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7209103 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Fagard Katleen K Wolthuis Albert A Verhaegen Marleen M Flamaing Johan J Deschodt Mieke M

PloS one 20200508 5

<h4>Background</h4>Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery have demonstrated beneficial effects on postoperative complications, return of bowel function, length of stay, and costs, without increasing readmissions or mortality. However, ERPs were not specifically designed for older patients and feasibility in older patients has been questioned.<h4>Aim</h4>The aim of this study was to assess ERP adherence and outcomes in older patients and to identify risk factors for postoperative ...[more]

PMID: 32384120

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare post-operative length of stay and complication rates of matched obese and non-obese patients in an enhanced recovery (ERAS) program after open gynecologic cancer surgery.MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study of patients (n=1225) undergoing open surgery from November 2014 to November 2018 at a tertiary cancer center. Patients undergoing multidisciplinary procedures, non-oncologic surgery, or procedures in addition to abdominal surgery were excluded (n=190). Obese and non-obese patients were matched by date, age, disease status, and surgical complexity. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay. Secondary outcomes included 30-day peri-operative complications, re-operation, re-admission, opioid use, and program compliance.ResultsAfter matching, 696 patients (348 obese, 348 non-obese) with median age of 57 years (IQR 48-66) were analyzed. Obese patients had a longer median procedure time (218 min vs 192.5 min, p<0.001) and greater median estimated blood loss (300 mL vs 200 mL, p<0.001). Median (IQR) post-operative length of stay was the same for obese and non-obese patients: 3 days (IQR 2-4). Obese and non-obese patients had similar rates of grade III-IV complications (10.9% and 6.6%, respectively, p=0.06), re-operation (2.3% and 1.4%, respectively, p=0.58), and re-admission (11.8% and 8.0%, respectively, p=0.13). Grade I-II complications were more common among obese patients (62.4% vs 48.3%, p<0.001) because they had more wound complications (17.8% vs 4.9%, p<0.001). Obese patients received more opioids both during surgery (morphine equivalent dose 57.25 mg (IQR 35-72.5) vs 50 mg (IQR 25-622.5), p=0.003) and after surgery (morphine equivalent daily dose 45 mg/day (IQR 10-96.2) vs 29.37 mg/day (IQR 7.5-70), p=0.01). Obese and non-obese patients had similar ERAS program compliance (70.1% and 69.8%, respectively, p=0.32).ConclusionsNeither post-operative length of stay nor the rate of serious complications differed significantly despite longer surgeries, greater blood loss, and more opioid use among obese patients. An ERAS program was safe, effective, and feasible for obese patients with suspected gynecologic cancer.

Project description:BackgroundMost patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support in coping with their anxiety. Anxiolytic medication is a common way to address preoperative anxiety. However, the proportion of patients who welcome anxiolytic medication preoperatively and the preferred time of taking it have not been studied thoroughly.MethodsAdult patients (n = 1000) scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia were eligible to participate in this single-center observational study. Primary outcomes were the ratio of patients desiring anxiolytic medication (no/yes/on request) and the preferred time of taking it (evening before surgery/morning of day of surgery/on call to the operating room). Secondary outcomes included associations between different measures of anxiety (i.e., anxiety level according to the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and anxiety status (no/yes)) and desire for anxiolytic medication (no/yes/on request). Primary outcomes were analyzed descriptively, and secondary outcomes were analyzed using multinomial logistic regressions.ResultsThree hundred fifty-six (35.6%) out of 1000 patients desired anxiolytic medication and 239 (23.9%) patients would welcome anxiolytic medication on request. In patients reporting anxiety (no/yes; n = 493), 228 (46.2%) stated a clear desire for anxiolytic medication (yes) and 142 (28.8%) considered anxiolytic medication (on request). Patients' preferences concerning the timing of premedication vary widely. In patients reporting a clear desire for anxiolytic medication (n = 356), the "morning of the day of surgery" was most frequently (n = 111, 31.2%) stated as the preferred time to get anxiolytic medication, followed by "on call to the operating room" (n = 51, 14.3%). All anxiety measures were significantly associated with desire for anxiolytic medication (p < 0.05).ConclusionsGiven the importance of preoperative anxiety to patients, patients' desire for anxiolytic medication should be considered when discussing the pros and cons of premedication. Individualized instead of standardized prescription and timing of premedication is recommended.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS 00013319 , approved 23/11/2017).

Project description:ImportanceDelirium is a common, serious, and potentially preventable problem for older adults, associated with adverse outcomes. Coupled with its preventable nature, these adverse sequelae make delirium a significant public health concern; understanding its economic costs is important for policy makers and health care leaders to prioritize care.ObjectiveTo evaluate current 1-year health care costs attributable to postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing elective surgery.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study included 497 patients from the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study, an ongoing cohort study of older adults undergoing major elective surgery. Patients were enrolled from June 18, 2010, to August 8, 2013. Eligible patients were 70 years or older, English-speaking, able to communicate verbally, and scheduled to undergo major surgery at 1 of 2 Harvard-affiliated hospitals with an anticipated length of stay of at least 3 days. Eligible surgical procedures included total hip or knee replacement; lumbar, cervical, or sacral laminectomy; lower extremity arterial bypass surgery; open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; and open or laparoscopic colectomy. Data were analyzed from October 15, 2019, to September 15, 2020.ExposuresMajor elective surgery and hospitalization.Main outcomes and measuresCumulative and period-specific costs (index hospitalization, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year follow-up) were examined using Medicare claims and extensive clinical data. Total inflation-adjusted health care costs were determined using data from Medicare administrative claims files for the 2010 to 2014 period. Delirium was rated using the Confusion Assessment Method. We also examined whether increasing delirium severity was associated with higher cumulative and period-specific costs. Delirium severity was measured with the Confusion Assessment Method-Severity long form. Regression models were used to determine costs associated with delirium after adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsOf the 566 patients who were eligible for the study, a total of 497 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [5.1] years; 281 women [57%]; 461 White participants [93%]) were enrolled after exclusion criteria were applied. During the index hospitalization, 122 patients (25%) developed postoperative delirium, whereas 375 (75%) did not. Patients with delirium had significantly higher unadjusted health care costs than patients without delirium (mean [SD] cost, $146 358 [$140 469] vs $94 609 [$80 648]). After adjusting for relevant confounders, the cumulative health care costs attributable to delirium were $44 291 (95% CI, $34 554-$56 673) per patient per year, with the majority of costs coming from the first 90 days: index hospitalization ($20 327), subsequent rehospitalizations ($27 797), and postacute rehabilitation stays ($2803). Health care costs increased directly and significantly with level of delirium severity (none-mild, $83 534; moderate, $99 756; severe, $140 008), suggesting an exposure-response relationship. The adjusted mean cumulative costs attributable to severe delirium were $56 474 (95% CI, $40 927-$77 440) per patient per year. Extrapolating nationally, the health care costs attributable to postoperative delirium were estimated at $32.9 billion (95% CI, $25.7 billion-$42.2 billion) per year.Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that the economic outcomes of delirium and severe delirium after elective surgery are substantial, rivaling costs associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These results highlight the need for policy imperatives to address delirium as a large-scale public health issue.

Project description:BackgroundThe principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aim to reduce the physiological stress of surgery which in turn improve clinical and health economic outcomes. There is ample evidence in literature supporting ERAS methodologies in other surgical specialties, but its adoption in spinal surgery, especially in Australia remains in infancy. The aim of this project is to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for simple spine surgery, a first of its kind in Australia.MethodsAn ERAS protocol was designed using an evidenced-based review of the literature. The authors then conducted a prospective cohort analysis looking at outcome of patients undergoing elective spinal (lumbar and cervical) decompression surgery under ERAS principles by a single surgeon on the Westmead Hospital Campus between March 2021 to May 2023. Primary outcomes were patient length of stay (LOS), patient reported pain and disability scores and complications (including readmissions within 30 days and re-operation within 6 months). Secondary outcomes included predictors of failure for same-day discharge.ResultsA total of 52 patients underwent spinal decompression surgeries under the ERAS protocol. Overall 43 out of 52 patients (83.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day as their surgery. Patient reported outcomes were improved at 6 weeks and 6 months confirming durability of intervention. The rates of complications were similar to literature reported rates for simple lumbar or cervical decompression procedures and there were no readmissions within 30 days or re-operations within 6 months of surgery. Being of non-English speaking background [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, P=0.04] and from home alone (OR =10.25, P=0.03) were predictors of failure of same day discharge in this small cohort.ConclusionsImplementation of ERAS protocols for simple spinal decompression surgeries is feasible and produces durable improved patient outcomes while reducing LOS in hospitals. Patient social factors can be predictive of lack of compliance.

Dataset Information

A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Publications

A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets