Dataset Information

SAT-LB6 First Human Trial of an Oral Native Testosterone Shows Physiological Levels of Testosterone and Dht in Both Fasted and Fed State in Hypogonadal Men

ABSTRACT: Abstract Introduction: The prevalence of male hypogonadism is estimated to be 6% in the USA (1). Current therapies have limited acceptability: gels can be messy and risk inadvertent dosing of others; injections are painful; and oral testosterone undecanoate (TU) delivers variable testosterone levels, requires concurrent ingestion of a fatty meal and may produce supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. We present the first human trial of an oral native testosterone preparation formulated to deliver physiological levels of testosterone irrespective of food intake. Aim: To compare the pharmacokinetics of DITEST (Diurnal Ltd Cardiff, UK) to an oil based oral TU formulation (Andriol Testocaps MSD, UK) and explore the effect of food on DITEST bioavailability. Methods: Single centre, phase 1b study of DITEST in 25 adult males with hypogonadism, one subject withdrawn after single period and only included in safety analysis (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02966652). Part 1 compared the pharmacokinetics of 80mg TU with 120mg DITEST after a high fat meal. Part 2 the pharmacokinetics of 200mg of DITEST administered in either fed or fasted states. Results are baseline adjusted. Results: DITEST showed a testosterone dose response between 120mg and 200mg with Cmax 550 (19.1) and 877 (30.4) ng/dl (nmol/l) and AUC0-10h 59.5 and 88.6 h*nmol/L. DITEST 200mg gave an equivalent Cmax and AUC0-10h to TU 80mg: Cmax 877 (30.4) vs 906 (31.4) ng/dl (nmol/l) and AUC0-10h 88.6 vs 102 h*nmol/L. Fed and fasted DITEST had similar pharmacokinetics: Cmax 764 (26.5) vs 877 (30.4) ng/dl (nmol/L), AUC0-10h 87.0 vs 88.6. DITEST resulted in lower levels of DHT than TU: Cmax 84 (2.9), 131 (4.5) & 194 (6.7) ng/dl (nmol/l); AUC0-10h 11.0, 16.7 & 36.3 h*nmol/L for DITEST 120mg, 200mg & 80mg TU, respectively. There was one serious adverse event (urinary retention) in the study during TU dosing. There were no emerging safety concerns, and adverse event frequency and severity was similar between the two treatments. Discussion: These results demonstrate that 200mg DITEST provides similar testosterone exposure with more physiological DHT exposure than 80mg TU given with a high fat meal. Administration of DITEST in fed and fasted states provides similar testosterone and DHT exposure. Compared to published literature on a self-emulsifying formulation of TU at 200mg, DITEST at 200mg provides a similar testosterone Cmax and no requirement for a fatty meal (2). Conclusion: DITEST is an oral native testosterone formulation with anticipated advantages over current oral therapy of dosing without food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. References: 1. Basaria S. Male hypogonadism. Lancet 2014; 383:1250-1263. 2. Yin AY, et al., J Androl 2012; 33:190-201.

SUBMITTER: Newell-Price J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7209306 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND: In men, obesity is often associated with low testosterone (T) levels, but information is limited as to how body weight affects the pharmacokinetic profile or dosing of testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with T deficiency. Historically, men with body mass index (BMI) >32.4 kg/m2 required higher doses of T 2% gel to achieve physiological T levels than men with BMI ≤29.1 or 29.2–32.4 kg/m2.(1) In a phase 3 trial (N=150) of subcutaneous (SC) testosterone enanthate (TE) administered weekly, concentration-guided dosing raised T levels to within physiological range in 92.7% of patients.(2) Here, we report a post hoc analysis evaluating the association between body weight and serum T levels attained with SC TE. Methods: SC TE was evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, dose-blinded, 52-week phase 3 trial (NCT02159469). Patients self-administered 75 mg SC TE weekly during the titration phase; blinded dose-adjustments in 25 mg increments occurred at pre-defined time points beyond the sixth dose. The primary endpoint of this study was the percentage of patients achieving an average serum T concentration (Cavg0-168h) of 300 to 1,100 ng/dL at week 12. For this post hoc analysis, a linear regression model with weight and dose as independent variables was used to assess differences in mean minimum T concentration (Cmin) and Cavg0-168h at week 12. Results: For this analysis, 137 patients were included. Doses were 50 mg (n=25), 75 mg (n=93), and 100 mg (n=19). The mean weight was 84.4 kg, 102.2 kg, and 112.0 kg for the 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg dose groups, respectively (range, 49.9–146.5 kg). The dose-normalized T Cmin was 9.2 ng/dL, 5.7 ng/dL, and 4.3 ng/dL per 1 mg of SC TE for the 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg groups, respectively. The dose-normalized T Cavg0-168h was 12.0 ng/dL, 7.2 ng/dL, and 5.7 ng/dL per 1 mg of SC TE. In an overall linear regression model, 48.2% (P<0.0001) and 55.0% (P<0.0001) of the total variance in Cmin and Cavg0-168h, respectively, can be predicted from the independent weight and dose variables. Conclusion: Our results show an inverse relationship between body weight and T exposure. Men with higher mean body weights required higher doses of SC TE to achieve physiologic T levels compared with men with lower mean body weights. The available doses provide effective options to reach target exposures. These findings highlight the impact of weight and dose selection on SC TE exposure. References: (1) Dobs et al., J Sex Med 2014;11:857–864; (2) Kaminetsky et al., J Urol. 2019;201:587–94.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the relative effects of individual testosterone products among hypogonadal men.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and grey literature (25 May 2017) for randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRS) that involved hypogonadal men given testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for ≥3 months. Comparators were placebo, another TRT, or the same product at a different dose. Outcomes were quality of life, depression, libido, erectile function, activities of daily living and testosterone levels, as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, prostate cancer, heart disease, diabetes, serious adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and erythrocytosis. RCT data were pooled via meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool (RCTs) andScottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)50 (NRS).ResultsEighty-seven RCTs and 51 NRS were included. Most were at high or unclear risk of bias, with short treatment duration and follow-up. When compared as a class against placebo, TRT improved quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.26, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.11), libido (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.50), depression (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.01) and erectile function (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.41). Most individual TRTs were significantly better than placebo at improving libido (6/10). Only one TRT was better than placebo at improving quality of life, and no individual TRTs improved depression or erectile function. There was no increased risk of adverse events, with the exception of withdrawals due to adverse events with the use of some TRTs.ConclusionDespite a class effect of improving quality of life, depression, erectile function and libido, major improvements were not observed with the use of any individual product. We observed no statistically significant increase in the risk of adverse events; however, longer-term high-quality trials are needed to fully assess the risk of harm.Prospero registration numberCRD42014009963.

Dataset Information

SAT-LB6 First Human Trial of an Oral Native Testosterone Shows Physiological Levels of Testosterone and Dht in Both Fasted and Fed State in Hypogonadal Men

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets