Dataset Information

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar candidate of adalimumab (HS016) compared with adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS:A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive control, phase III clinical trial was conducted at 28 locations in China. Patients with active ankylosing spondylitis were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to subcutaneously receive 40 mg of either HS016 or adalimumab every other week for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was to achieve at least a 20% improvement (ASAS20) in patients at 24 weeks according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria. The secondary endpoint included other efficacy assessment parameters, health evaluations, safety, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenicity parameters. RESULTS:Following the random assignment of 648 patients into HS016 (n?=?416) and adalimumab (n?=?232) groups, no significant difference was found in the ASAS20 response rates at 24 weeks between the HS016 (364/416, 87.5%) and adalimumab (209/232, 90.1%) treatments and the difference between the response rates (-?2.59%; 90% confidence interval [CI] -?6.77 to 1.60) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±?15%). There were also no significant differences when the secondary endpoints were compared (all p?>?0.05). Similarly, the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were not significantly different between the two groups, with most TEAEs being mild to moderate. Only nine severe cases were found, including seven within the HS016 group, three (0.7%) of which were tuberculosis cases. Plasma concentrations of HS016 and adalimumab from weeks 12 to 14 were similar during the steady-state period and steady-state maximal concentration (Cmax,ss) was equivalent for HS016 (7356.6 ng/mL) and adalimumab (7600.3 ng/mL). The accumulated proportion of patients with positive human anti-human antibodies (HAHAs) at week 24 was 326/412 (79.1%) in the HS016 group and 183/229 (79.9%) in the adalimumab group (p?>?0.05), while the accumulated proportion of patients with positive neutralizing antibody (NAb) tests were 72/412 (17.5%) in the HS016 group and 43/229 (18.8%) in the adalimumab group (p?>?0.05). CONCLUSION:HS016 resembled adalimumab in efficacy and safety over the 24-week treatment period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ChiCTR1900022520.

SUBMITTER: Su J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7211209 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial.

Su Jinmei J Li Mengtao M He Lan L Zhao Dongbao D Wan Weiguo W Liu Yi Y Xu Jianhua J Xu Jian J Liu Huaxiang H Jiang Lindi L Wu Huaxiang H Zuo Xiaoxia X Huang Cibo C Liu Xiumei X Li Fen F Zhang Zhiyi Z Liu Xiangyuan X Dong Lingli L Li Tianwang T Chen Haiying H Li Jingyang J He Dongyi D Lu Xin X Huang Anbin A Tao Yi Y Wang Yanyan Y Zhang Zhuoli Z Wei Wei W Li Xiaofeng X Zeng Xiaofeng X

BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy 20200601 3

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar candidate of adalimumab (HS016) compared with adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis.<h4>Methods</h4>A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive control, phase III clinical trial was conducted at 28 locations in China. Patients with active ankylosing spondylitis were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to subcutaneously receive 40 mg of either HS016 or adalimuma ...[more]

PMID: 32078145

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:This double-blind, randomized, 78-week study evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, versus adalimumab reference product (Humira®) sourced from the EU (adalimumab-EU) in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) (10-25 mg/week). We report results for the first 26 weeks of treatment. METHODS:Patients with active RA (N = 597) were randomly assigned (1:1) to PF-06410293 or adalimumab-EU, while continuing with MTX treatment. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) at week 12. Therapeutic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ACR20 difference between the two arms was entirely contained within the symmetric equivalence margin (±14%). Additionally, a two-sided 90% CI was calculated by using an asymmetric equivalence margin (-12%, 15%). Secondary efficacy endpoints to week 26 included ACR20/50/70, change from baseline Disease Activity Score based on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [DAS28-4(CRP)], European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, DAS28-4(CRP) of less than?2.6, and ACR/EULAR remission. QuantiFERON-TB testing was performed at screening and week 26. RESULTS:Patients (78.7% of whom were female and whose mean age was 52.5 years) had a mean baseline RA duration of 6.8 years. The mean baseline DAS28-4(CRP) values were 5.9 (PF-06410293) and 6.1 (adalimumab-EU). The observed week-12 ACR20 values were 68.7% (PF-06410293) and 72.7% (adalimumab-EU) in the intention-to-treat population. With non-responder imputation, the treatment difference in week-12 ACR20 was -2.98% and corresponding CIs-95% CI (-10.38%, 4.44%) and 90% CI (-9.25%, 3.28%)-were entirely contained within the equivalence margins (symmetric and asymmetric, respectively). The secondary efficacy endpoints were similar between arms. Over 26 weeks, injection-site reactions occurred in 1.7% versus 2.0%, hypersensitivity events in 4.4% versus 8.4%, pneumonia in 0.7% versus 2.0%, and opportunistic infections in 2.4% versus 1.7% in the PF-06410293 and adalimumab-EU arms, respectively. One death due to myocardial infarction occurred (adalimumab-EU arm). Rates of anti-drug antibody incidence were 44.4% (PF-06410293) and 50.5% (adalimumab-EU). CONCLUSIONS:The study results demonstrate that efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-06410293 and adalimumab-EU were similar during the first 26 weeks of treatment in patients with active RA on background MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02480153 . First posted on June 24, 2015; EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT number: 2014-000352-29 . Start date: October 27, 2014.

Project description:ObjectiveThe equivalence of the biosimilar HS016 to adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients has been previously validated. The aim was to compare the efficacy of HS016 and adalimumab in stratified subgroups at different time points using Health Assessment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) and short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires.MethodsWe carried out a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive control, phase 3 trial of patients with active AS. They were selected randomly to be subcutaneously administered 40 mg HS016 or adalimumab every 2 weeks for a total treatment period of 24 weeks in a 2:1 ratio. A health surveys were used to assess mental and physical improvements of patients as well as other factors.ResultsHAQ-S revealed that changes in scores from baseline in both groups were time dependent until 14 weeks and that during the first 4 weeks of treatment the changes declined rapidly. The SF-36 health survey revealed that both HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid beneficial effects against AS during the first 2 weeks of therapy, which gradually declined between 2 and 12 weeks and flattened out after 12 weeks until 24 weeks.ConclusionThis trial demonstrated that both HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid improvements in symptoms during the first 2 weeks of treatment. These findings suggest that HS016 is an alternative economical treatment for Chinese AS patients producing a rapid amelioration of symptoms, aiding them to recover their lifestyle satisfaction.Trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx , ChiCTR1900022520, retrospectively registered. Key points • HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid AS symptom improvements during the first 2 weeks followed by a slowdown of improvements until week 4 with afterwards few improvements evaluated by HAQ-S • The improvements according to the short form of the 36 (SF-36) questionnaires revealed similar trends as for HAQ-S • There was no significant difference in HAQ-S and SF-36 scores between HS016 and adalimumab.

Project description:The development of a biosimilar is based on comparative structural, physicochemical, functional and clinical assessments. The sum of these analyses encompasses the 'totality of evidence', which demonstrates no clinically meaningful differences between the biosimilar and the reference product (RP). Once biosimilarity has been established, provided there is suitable scientific justification, clinical data may be extrapolated to other indications of the RP. AVT02 has been developed as a biosimilar to high-concentration, low-volume Humira (adalimumab), an anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody approved for various chronic inflammatory indications. The totality of evidence for AVT02 is described, supporting its approval as an adalimumab biosimilar for all approved indications globally. Analytical similarity assessments using mass spectrometry methods demonstrated identical amino acid sequences for AVT02 and the RP, with high similarity in terms of primary structure, post-translational modifications and higher-order structural attributes. The mechanism of action was assessed by various cell-based potency assays and binding assays, and the results demonstrated that AVT02 is highly similar to the RP. No clinically meaningful differences in terms of purity, potency and safety were observed, and minor differences in a few physiochemical attributes did not impact the in vitro biologic activity and were not considered clinically relevant. Clinical similarity was demonstrated by comparing the pharmacokinetic, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profiles of AVT02 with those of the RP. Clinical studies supported similar pharmacokinetic and comparable immunogenicity profiles between AVT02 and the RP in healthy participants and participants with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, with no new safety signals detected. The totality of evidence described demonstrates the biosimilarity of AVT02 to the RP, thereby fulfilling the scientific and regulatory requirements for AVT02 as a high-concentration biosimilar for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and all approved indications of the RP.

Project description:IntroductionThe aim of this work is to examine the efficacy and safety of prefilled liquid etanercept-biosimilar Yisaipu versus lyophilized Yisaipu in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.MethodsThis double-blind, phase III trial with non-inferiority design randomized adult patients with active AS in a 3:1:1 ratio to receive twice-weekly 25-mg prefilled liquid Yisaipu for a total of 48 injections (group I, n = 330), once-weekly 50-mg prefilled liquid Yisaipu for 24 injections (group II, n = 110), or twice-weekly 25-mg lyophilized Yisaipu for 48 injections (group III, n = 110). Both physicians and patients who received 25-mg twice-weekly lyophilized or liquid Yisaipu were blinded to treatment assignment while patients who received 50-mg once-weekly liquid Yisaipu received treatment in an open-label design. In addition, 90 patients in the PK/PD study were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to each group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved ASAS20 at week 24.ResultsA total of 640 subjects were enrolled. The proportion of patients who attained ASAS20 at week 24 was 85.56% in group I, 85.71% in group II, and 83.45% in group III (group I vs. III, P = 0.545; group II vs. III, P = 0.605). The difference between group I and III was 2.10% (95% CI - 5.06%, 9.27%) and 2.26% (95% CI - 6.21%, 10.73%) between group II and III, meeting the non-inferiority threshold (Δ = - 15%) (P < 0.001). Except for a statistical difference between group I (75.83%) and group III at week 8 (64.75%, P = 0.011), there was no statistical difference in the ASAS20 attainment rate among the three groups at other time points. The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable among the three groups (group I, 2.50%, II, 2.86% and III, 1.43%; P > 0.05). No deaths were reported.ConclusionsOnce-weekly 50-mg or twice-weekly 25-mg prefilled liquid Yisaipu is safe and non-inferior to twice-weekly 25-mg lyophilized Yisaipu.Trial registrationCTR20130124 and NCT04345458.

Dataset Information

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial.

Publications

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets