Dataset Information

Efficacy of slit lamp breath shields.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of slit lamp breath shields to prevent droplet spray from a simulated sneeze. DESIGN:Experimental study to test effectiveness of personal protective equipment. METHODS:The nozzle of a spray gun was adjusted to angularly disperse a mist of colored dye that approximated a patient sneezing on a dimensionally accurate cardboard slit lamp model. We tested the designs of six commercially available breath shields, and one breath shield repurposed from a plastic container lid. Each breath shield was sprayed in a standardized fashion three times and the amount of overspray compared with no shield was quantified. The surface area that was sprayed was calculated using Adobe Photoshop's color range function. The average percentage of overspray of each breath shield was computed in comparison to the control. RESULTS:The breath shields ranged in surface area from 116-1254 cm2 and the amount of overspray varied from 54% to virtually none. Larger breath shields offered better protection than smaller ones. Breath shields attached to the objective lens arm were a better barrier than those hung by the oculars of comparable size. A repurposed plastic lid breath shield was 513cm2, was slightly curved toward the examiner's face, and allowed only 2% overspray. The largest breath shield (1254 cm2) hung near the oculars and prevented essentially all the overspray. CONCLUSION:The performance of different designs of breath shields is variable. Even high functioning shields should be used in conjunction with personal protective equipment including masks, goggles and gloves, and handwashing. Ideally patients should also wear a cloth mask during all slit lamp exams.

SUBMITTER: Liu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7212996 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of Slit Lamp Breath Shields.

Liu John J Wang Annie Y AY Ing Edsel B EB

American journal of ophthalmology 20200511

<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the efficacy of slit lamp breath shields to prevent droplet spray from a simulated sneeze.<h4>Design</h4>Experimental study to test the effectiveness of personal protective equipment.<h4>Methods</h4>The nozzle of a spray gun was adjusted to angularly disperse a mist of colored dye that approximated a patient sneezing on a dimensionally accurate cardboard slit lamp model. The designs of 6 commercially available breath shields and 1 breath shield repurposed from a plast ...[more]

PMID: 32407727

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo assess the usability and image quality of a smartphone adapter for direct slit lamp imaging.MethodsA single-center, prospective, clinical study conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. The smartphone group consisted of 26 medical staff (consultants, residents, and students). The control group consisted of one ophthalmic photographer. Both groups took images of the anterior and the posterior eye segment of the same proband. The control group used professional photography equipment. The participant group used an Apple iPhone 11 mounted on a slit lamp via a removable SlitREC smartphone adapter (Custom Surgical GmbH, Munich, Germany). The image quality was graded independently by two blinded ophthalmologists on a scale from 0 (low) to 10 (high quality). Images with a score ≥ 7.0/10 were considered as good as the reference images. The acquisition time was measured. A questionnaire on usability and experience in smartphone and slit lamp use was taken by all of the participants.ResultsEach participant had three attempts at the same task. The overall smartphone quality was 7.2/10 for the anterior and 6.4/10 for the posterior segment. The subjectively perceived difficulty decreased significantly over the course of three attempts (Kendall's W). Image quality increased as well but did not improve significantly from take 1 to take 3. However, the image quality of the posterior segment was significantly, positively correlated (Spearman's Rho) with work experience. The mean acquisition time for anterior segment imaging was faster in the smartphone group compared to the control group (156 vs. 206 s). It was vice versa for the posterior segment (180 vs. 151 s).ConclusionSlit lamp imaging with the presented smartphone adapter provides high-quality imaging of the anterior segment. Posterior segment imaging remains challenging in terms of image quality. The adapter constitutes a cost-effective, portable, easy-to-use solution for recording ophthalmic photos and videos. It can facilitate clinical documentation and communication among colleagues and with the patient especially outside normal consultation hours. Direct slit lamp imaging allows for time to be saved and increases the independence of ophthalmologists in terms of patient mobility and the availability of photographic staff.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of slit lamp breath shields.

Publications

Efficacy of Slit Lamp Breath Shields.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets