Dataset Information

Patient and clinician incentives and barriers for opioid use for musculoskeletal disorders a qualitative study on opioid use in musculoskeletal setting.

ABSTRACT: Introduction:Strategies for pain alleviation have relied heavily on opioids in the recent decades. One consequence is a crisis of opioid misuse, overdose, and overdose related death. This study sought patient and clinician incentives and barriers to the use of opioids in musculoskeletal illness. Methods:In this qualitative study, twenty-eight patients and eight clinicians participated in a semi-structured interview seeking incentives and barriers for opioid use and prescription in musculoskeletal illness. Interviews were conducted by a trained qualitative interviewer. The interview data were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis framework. Results:Patient incentives for opioid use included doctor's orders, opioids being the only effective way to alleviate pain, alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety, being able to keep a job, and lower cost of opioids relative to alternative treatment options. Patient barriers included associated risks (side effects, addiction) and wanting to control pain intensity. Clinician incentives for prescribing opioids included adequate pain alleviation, patient satisfaction, relatively inexpensive costs of opioids, convenience and doing what was taught by the clinician's superior. Lacking time and resources to adequately inform patients on appropriate opioid use and alternative treatments, likely results in more opioid prescribing than arguably necessary. Barriers for opioid prescribing included specific patient characteristics (psychiatric background, history of opioid misuse) and illness characteristics (nature of the injury, medical contra-indications). Conclusion:Patients feel that opioids should be used with caution. Clinicians in this study reported a tendency to default to opioids out of habit and convenience. Both patients and clinicians were aware that opioids are often misused to treat emotional pain.

SUBMITTER: Dekker AE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7217918 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: The poor translation of research findings into routine clinical practice is common in all areas of healthcare. Having a better understanding of how researchers and clinicians experience engagement in and with research, their working relationships and expectations of each other, may be one way to help to facilitate collaborative partnerships and therefore increase successful translation of research into clinical practice.Aims: To explore the views of clinical and research staff about their experiences of working together during research projects and identify the facilitators and barriers.Methods: We conducted four focus groups with 18 participants - clinicians, researchers and those with a dual clinical-research role, recruited from one mental health Trust and one university. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.Results: Eight themes were identified under the headings of two research questions 1) Barriers and facilitators of either engaging in or with research from the perspective of clinical staff, with themes of understanding the benefits of the research; perceived knowledge and personal qualities of researchers; lack of time and organisational support to be involved in and implement research; and lack of feedback about progress and outcome of research. 2) Barriers and facilitators for engaging with clinicians when conducting research, from the perspective of researchers, with themes of understanding what clinicians need to know and how they need to feel to engage with research; demonstrating an understanding of the clinician's world; navigating through the clinical world; and demands of the researcher role.Conclusion: There was agreement between clinicians and researchers about the barriers and facilitators for engaging clinicians in research. Both groups identified that it was the researcher's responsibility to form and maintain good working relationships. Better support for researchers in their role calls for training in communication skills and bespoke training to understand the local context in which research is taking place.

Project description:BackgroundVeterans involved in the legal system are at high risk for overdose but have lower receipt of medications for opioid use disorder than other veterans.ObjectiveThe study aimed to understand barriers to medication access from the perspective of legally involved veterans with opioid use disorder and people who work with these veterans in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and the legal system.DesignThis national qualitative study interviewed veterans and stakeholders from 14 geographically diverse VHA facilities to explore perceptions of barriers to medications for opioid use disorder.ParticipantsParticipants included veterans with a history of opioid use disorder and legal involvement (n = 18), VHA Veterans Justice Programs Specialists (n = 15), VHA and community substance use disorder treatment providers (n = 5), and criminal justice staff (n = 12).ApproachWe conducted interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a team-based approach.Key resultsFour key barriers, noted by group, were identified: (1) a preference for counseling along with or instead of medications (veterans, Specialists, treatment providers, criminal justice staff); (2) concerns about veterans using medications without a prescription, selling them, or providing them to others (veterans, Specialists, treatment providers, criminal justice staff); (3) concerns about perceived stigma towards medication use (veterans, Specialists, treatment providers, criminal justice staff); and (4) concerns about medication discontinuation after recurrent opioid use (veterans, criminal justice staff). A fifth theme, education, was noted by all stakeholders except providers as important to facilitating use of medications for opioid use disorder. All five themes mapped to the framework construct of knowledge and beliefs about the intervention.ConclusionsBased on identified barriers, interventions focused on enhancing medication knowledge, reducing stigma towards use of medications, and increasing knowledge that opioid use may recur during treatment may help increase access to medication for veterans with legal involvement.

Project description:Introduction: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce illicit opioid use and overdose mortality, but effectiveness remains limited by poor treatment retention. Understanding multilevel barriers and facilitators to retention from the patient perspective can guide intervention strategies to improve retention. Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews to elicit perspectives of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) currently (n = 19) and formerly (n = 16) receiving treatment from a multi-clinic outpatient MOUD program in Pennsylvania in July 2020 to January 2021. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior model provided a theoretical framework for analysis. Results: Based on interview themes, physical, rather than psychological, capability was more salient to MOUD engagement, and pertained to individual-level factors such as side effects, withdrawal, and the degree to which MOUD addressed participants’ need for pain management. Co-existing mental health conditions also challenged participants’ physical ability to attend appointments. The opportunity domain contained both physical and social aspects. Physical opportunity for MOUD engagement centered on community-level factors related to MOUD access (e.g., distance, transportation) and clinical-level factors including program policies. Themes related to social opportunity included interpersonal influences—such as therapeutic and social support—and stigma associated with OUD and MOUD. Motivation emerged as the dominant domain for patients. Reflective motivation factors included individual-level factors such as participants’ recognition of their addiction and “readiness” to quit illicit opioid use, attitudes toward MOUD, future treatment expectations, motivation to engage in MOUD, and perceived consequences of disengagement. Automatic motivation factors included the degree to which MOUD created a sense of normalcy for participants and the use of illicit drugs to numb emotions. Conclusions: Factors at the individual, interpersonal, clinical, community, and societal levels influenced patients’ capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in MOUD. Understanding such factors can inform implementation strategies to improve retention.

Dataset Information

Patient and clinician incentives and barriers for opioid use for musculoskeletal disorders a qualitative study on opioid use in musculoskeletal setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets