Dataset Information

Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pancreatic cancer represents the third leading cause of US cancer deaths, with median survival <1 year. The goal of this study was to describe systemic treatments, healthcare utilization and costs, and overall survival among patients with unresectable/metastatic disease.

Methods

This study used healthcare claims for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (at index date) during January 01 2010 to 31 May 2017. Included patients were aged ?18 years, with continuous 6-month preindex enrollment. Patients were excluded by resectable disease, another primary cancer, or pregnancy. Cohorts were based on first-line (LOT1) chemotherapy regimen.

Results

Overall, 12 978 patients (mean age 70 years, 51% male) were included, among which 5610 (43%) received chemotherapy. Of those, 23% received gemcitabine monotherapy, 22% gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel, 22% FOLFIRINOX, 3% FOLFOX, and 29% received other regimens. Mean LOT1 duration was 112 days; 60% did not undergo subsequent lines of therapy. Moreover, 50% of patients had an emergency room visit and 45% were hospitalized during LOT1. Among treated and untreated patients, mean total 6-month costs were $52 101. We found that patients receiving FOLFIRINOX had the highest costs, whereas those who received gemcitabine monotherapy had the lowest. Median overall survival (mOS) was 335 days with any first-line treatment. FOLFIRINOX-treated patients had the highest mOS (492 days), whereas gemcitabine monotherapy-treated patients had the lowest (223 days).

Conclusions

A large proportion (57%) of patients with unresectable/metastatic pancreatic cancer did not receive chemotherapy. Healthcare costs were higher for fluorouracil-based regimens, while lower for gemcitabine-based regimens. Survival rates were within expectations for advanced pancreatic cancer.

SUBMITTER: Doleh Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7221424 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

Doleh Yunes Y Lal Lincy S LS Blauer-Petersen Cori C Antico Giovanni G Pishvaian Michael M

Cancer medicine 20200325 10

<h4>Background</h4>Pancreatic cancer represents the third leading cause of US cancer deaths, with median survival <1 year. The goal of this study was to describe systemic treatments, healthcare utilization and costs, and overall survival among patients with unresectable/metastatic disease.<h4>Methods</h4>This study used healthcare claims for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (at index date) during January 01 2010 to 31 May 2017. Included patient ...[more]

PMID: 32212262

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionTreatments for Peyronie's disease (PD) include surgical management and collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH).AimsTo evaluate PD treatment trends after CCH approval and compare clinical outcomes in CCH- and surgery-treated cohorts.MethodsPatients newly diagnosed with PD between January 2011 and December 2017 were identified in a U.S. claims database. Cohorts initiating treatment with CCH or surgery between January 2014 and June 2017 were included. Patients were continuously enrolled ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after index date. Post-treatment penile complications and analgesic use were compared 1 year after procedure in propensity score-matched cohorts.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures of this study were treatment patterns, penile complications, and analgesic use.ResultsIn the newly diagnosed PD cohort, 1,609 patients received CCH and 1,555 patients had surgery. Overall CCH or surgery treatment rate/year increased from 9.8% in 2014 to 15.5% in 2017, with <1% receiving verapamil or interferon. Initial treatment ratios of CCH to surgery increased from approximately 1:1 (2014) to 2:1 (2017). In the unmatched CCH (n = 1,227) and surgery (n = 620) cohorts, more (P < .05) surgery-treated patients received analgesics (particularly opioids), oral PD therapies, vacuum erection devices, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors before the index date. After propensity score matching (n = 620/cohort), newly occurring postprocedural complications during the follow-up period were higher in the surgery cohort (25.3% vs 18.4%, P = .003). The surgery cohort had significantly (P < .05) higher rates of erectile dysfunction (65.0% vs 44.8%), penile pain (17.9% vs 8.9%), and penile swelling (8.1% vs 5.2%) and was more likely to be prescribed opioids (93.3% vs 38.9%; P < .0001) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27.0% vs 20.3%; P = .006).ConclusionCCH demonstrated fewer complications and less analgesic use than surgery and was used as the initial therapy for PD twice as often as surgery. L Trost, H Huang, X Han, et al. Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Outcomes with Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum vs Surgery in Peyronie's Disease: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis. Sex Med 2021;9:100321.

Project description:IntroductionHysterectomy and laparoscopy are common surgical procedures used for the treatment of endometriosis. This study compares outcomes for women who received either procedure within the first year post initial surgery.MethodsThe study used data from the Truven Health MarketScan claims databases from 2004 to 2013 to identify women aged 18-49 years who received an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy. Patients were excluded if they did not have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year before through 1 year after their endometriosis-related procedure, if they were diagnosed with uterine fibroids prior to or on the date of surgery (i.e., index date), or if they had a hysterectomy prior to the index date. The descriptive analyses examined differences between patients with an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy in regard to medications prescribed, complications, and hospitalizations during the immediate year post procedure.ResultsThe final sample consisted of 24,915 women who underwent a hysterectomy and 37,308 who underwent a laparoscopy. Results revealed significant differences between the cohorts, with women who received a laparoscopy more likely to be prescribed a GnRH agonist, progestin, danazol, or an opioid analgesic in the immediate year post procedure compared to women who underwent a hysterectomy. In contrast, women who underwent a hysterectomy generally had higher complication rates. Index hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) were higher for women who had a hysterectomy, while post-index hospitalization rates and LOS were higher for women who had a laparoscopy. For both cohorts, post-procedure complications were associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates and longer LOS.ConclusionThis study indicated significantly different 1-year post-surgical outcomes for patients who underwent an endometriosis-related hysterectomy relative to a laparoscopy. Furthermore, the endometriosis patients in this analysis had a considerable risk of surgical complications, subsequent surgeries, and hospital admissions, both during and after their initial therapeutic laparoscopy or hysterectomy.FundingAbbVie.

Project description:IntroductionOsteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that impacts 3.3-3.6% of population globally with significant health and societal impact. The current study assessed the disease burden, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in patients with OA and subgroups of hip and/or knee OA, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).MethodologyThis retrospective longitudinal case-control study collected OA-related data from January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2020 from the Dubai Real-World Claims Database (DRWD). Adults aged at least 18 years old with OA diagnosis and at least two claims and continuous enrolment during the study period were included in the study. The patients with OA were 1:1 matched with individuals without OA. The patients with OA were divided into four cohorts on the basis of an a priori algorithm: OA of the hip and/or knee (cohort 1) and (difficult-to-treat) subsets of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the hip and/or knee (cohort 2), inadequate response or inability to tolerate at least three pain-related medications (cohort 3), and contraindications to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (cohort 4).ResultsDisease burden of OA in Dubai and HCRU and treatment costs in patients with OA were evaluated from January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2021. Patients were compared with matched controls in 1:1 ratio. The overall cohort comprised 11,651 patients with a median age of 48 years and predominantly male population (61.6%). HCRU was calculated for each cohort and it was highest (United States dollar [USD] 11,354.39) in cohort 4 (patients with contraindication to NSAIDS); in cohort 3 (inability to respond to at least three pain-related medications), USD 495.30 and USD 765.14 were spent on medication and procedures, respectively. Highest cost burden was seen in cohort 4, USD 3120.49 on consumables and USD 228.18 on services.ConclusionOsteoarthritis imposes a substantial healthcare and economic burden in the UAE. The study findings elucidate the unmet need among patients with difficult-to-treat OA and inform development of new therapeutics to alleviate their burden.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Management of pancreatic cancer (PC) in elderly patients is unknown; clinical trials exclude patients with comorbidities and those of extreme age. This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival outcomes in elderly PC patients using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Histology codes 8140, 8500, 8010, 8560, 8490, 8000, 8260, 8255, 8261, 8263, 8020, 8050, 8141, 8144, 8210, 8211, or 8262 in Medicare Parts A and B were identified. Data regarding demographic, characteristics, treatments, and vital status between 1998 and 2009 were collected from the SEER. Determinants of treatment receipt and overall survival were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. RESULTS:A total of 5,975 patients met inclusion. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic whites (85%) and female (55%). Most cases presented with locoregional stage disease (74%); 41% received only chemotherapy, 30% chemotherapy and surgery, 10% surgery alone, 3% radiation, and 16% no cancer-directed therapy. Patients with more advanced cancer, older age, and those residing in areas of poverty were more likely to receive no treatment. Among patients 66-74 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.74) and surgery in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91) showed survival benefit as compared with the no treatment group. Among patients ≥75 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 0.87-4.8) or in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.87-2.91) was not associated with better survival. CONCLUSION:Treatment modality and survival differs by age and stage. Low socioeconomic status appears to be a major barrier to the receipt of PC therapy among Medicare patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:Elderly patients with cancer are under-represented on clinical trials and usually have comorbid illnesses. The management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is unknown, with many retrospective experiences but low sample sizes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data to analyze treatment patterns and survival of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer on a larger population scale, this study highlights treatment patterns and their effect on survival and proposes possible obstacles to access of care in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer other than Medicare coverage.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies have assessed the incremental economic burden of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) versus non-treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (i.e., non-TRD MDD) in commercially-insured and Medicaid-insured patients, but none have focused on Medicare-insured patients.ObjectiveTo assess healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of patients with TRD versus non-TRD MDD or without major depressive disorder (MDD; i.e., non-MDD) in a Medicare-insured population.MethodsAdult patients were retrospectively identified from the Chronic Condition Warehouse de-identified 100% Medicare database (01/2010-12/2016). MDD was defined as ≥1 MDD diagnosis and ≥1 claim for an antidepressant. Patients initiated on a third antidepressant following two antidepressant treatment regimens of adequate dose and duration were considered to have TRD. The index date was defined as the date of the first antidepressant claim for the TRD and non-TRD MDD cohorts, and as a randomly imputed date for the non-MDD cohort. Patients with TRD were matched 1:1 to non-TRD MDD patients and randomly selected non-MDD patients based on propensity scores. Analyses were also performed for a subset of patients aged ≥65.ResultsOf 29,543 patients with MDD, 3,225 (10.9%) met the study definition of TRD; 157,611 were included in the non-MDD cohort. Matched patients with TRD and non-TRD MDD were, on average, 58.9 and 59.0 years old, respectively. The TRD cohort had higher per-patient-per-year (PPPY) HRU than the non-TRD MDD (e.g., inpatient visits: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.36) and non-MDD cohorts (e.g., inpatient visits: IRR = 1.84, all P<0.001). The TRD cohort had significantly higher total PPPY healthcare costs than the non-TRD MDD cohort ($25,517 vs. $20,425, adjusted cost difference = $3,385) and non-MDD cohort ($25,517 vs. $14,542, adjusted cost difference = $4,015, all P<0.001). Similar results were found for the subset of patients ≥65.ConclusionAmong Medicare-insured patients, those with TRD had higher HRU and costs compared to those with non-TRD MDD and non-MDD.

Dataset Information

Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets