Dataset Information

An advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient with epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutation responded to toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy after resistance to osimertinib: a case report.

ABSTRACT: The clinical activity and favorable toxicity profile of osimertinib has led it to be approved not only for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with T790M-positive tumors when first, or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment fails, but also for untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR sensitizing mutation, so how to manage patients who get acquired resistance to osimertinib has becoming an emerging clinical challenge. This presentation would report a case of an advanced NSCLC patient with EGFR 19DEL who received combination therapy of toripalimab and chemotherapy after resistance to first line osimertinib therapy and achieved a PFS benefit of over 8 months. This case highlighted that immune checkpoint blockade combined chemotherapy might be a new possibility for advanced NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib.

SUBMITTER: Zhou J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7225156 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient with epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutation responded to toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy after resistance to osimertinib: a case report.

Zhou Juan J Zhou Fei F Xie Huikang H Wu Yan Y Zhao Jing J Su Chunxia C

Translational lung cancer research 20200401 2

The clinical activity and favorable toxicity profile of osimertinib has led it to be approved not only for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with T790M-positive tumors when first, or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment fails, but also for untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR sensitizing mutation, so how to manage patients who get acquired resistance to osimertinib has becoming an emerging clinical challenge. ...[more]

PMID: 32420075

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy have synergistic effects in multiple malignancies. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: We conducted this retrospective study at 3 hospitals in China and eligible patients were 18 years or older and had a primary diagnosis of unresectable HCC with macroscopic vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread. These patients were treated with toripalimab plus HAIC or lenvatinib monotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1, and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. The results were compared by Student's test or the chi-square test, and the survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. Results: A total of 118 patients were recruited for this study: 53 in the TorHAIC group and 65 in the lenvatinib group. We found that the TorHAIC group showed a longer PFS (9.3 [95% CI, 7.81-10.8] vs 4.8 months [95% CI, 3.31-6.29]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; p = .006), a longer OS (17.13 [95% CI, 13.99-20.27] vs 10.1 months [95% CI, 8.14-12.06]; HR = 0.5, 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.81; p = .005), a higher disease control rate (86.8% vs 69.2%, p = .002) and a higher ORR (47.2% vs 9.2%, p < .001) by RECIST criteria than the lenvatinib group. Both toripalimab plus HAIC and lenvatinib had acceptable safety profiles. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. In the propensity score-matched cohorts (47 pairs), the outcomes in the TorHAIC group were also better than those in the lenvatinib group (p < .05). Conclusion: Toripalimab plus HAIC was tolerable and effective in advanced HCC and the result needs to be confirmed in the phase III trial.

Project description:Background: The potency and safety of toripalimab combination with chemotherapy (TC) as the first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been demonstrated in the CHOICE-01 study. Our research explored whether TC was cost-effective compared to chemotherapy alone from the Chinese payer perspective. Materials and methods: Clinical parameters were obtained from a randomized, multicenter, registrational, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial. Standard fee databases and previously published literature were used to determine costs and utilities. A Markov model with three mutually exclusive health statuses (progression-free survival (PFS), disease progression, and death) was used to predict the disease course. The costs and utilities were discounted at 5% per annum. The main endpoints of the model included cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the uncertainty. Subgroup analyses were performed to verify the cost-effectiveness of TC in patients with squamous and non-squamous cancer. Results: TC combination therapy yielded an incremental 0.54 QALYs with an incremental cost of $11,777, compared to chemotherapy, giving rise to ICERs of $21,811.76/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that TC was not favorable at 1 time GDP per capita. With a prespecified willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of three times the GDP per capita, combined treatment had a 100% probability of being cost-effective and had substantial cost-effectiveness in advanced NSCLC. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that TC was more likely to be accepted with a WTP threshold higher than $22,195 in NSCLC. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the utility of PFS state, crossover proportions of the chemotherapy arm, cost per cycle of pemetrexed treatment, and discount rate were the dominant influencing factors. Subgroup analyses found that in patients with squamous NSCLC, the ICER was $14,966.09/QALY. In the non-squamous NSCLC, ICER raised to $23,836.27/QALY. ICERs were sensitive to the variance of the PFS state utility. TC was more likely to be accepted when WTP increases exceeded $14,908 in the squamous NSCLC subgroup and $23,409 in the non-squamous NSCLC subgroup. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, TC may be cost-effective in individuals with previously untreated advanced NSCLC at the prespecified WTP threshold compared to chemotherapy, and more significant in individuals with squamous NSCLC, which will provide evidence for clinicians to make the best decisions in general clinical practice.

Project description:BackgroundToripalimab is the first domestic anti-tumor programmed death 1 antibody marketed in China. The CHOICE-01 trial (identifier: NCT03856411) demonstrated that toripalimab plus chemotherapy can significantly improve the clinical outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, whether it is cost-effective remains unknown. Given the high cost of combination therapy, a cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy (TC) versus chemotherapy alone (PC) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC is required.MethodsA partitioned survival model was adopted to predict the course of disease in advanced NSCLC patients on TC or PC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system over a 10-year horizon. The survival data were obtained from the CHOICE-01 clinical trial. Cost and utility values were obtained from local hospitals and kinds of literature. Based on these parameters, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of TC vs. PC was measured, and one-way sensitivity analyses, probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA), and scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model.ResultsIn the base case, TC was associated with an incremental cost of $18510 and an incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of 0.57 compared with PC, resulting in an ICER of $32237/QALY which was lower than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold ($37654/QALY), TC was cost-effective. The health utility value of progression-free survival, the price of toripalimab, and the cost of best supportive care were factors that significantly influenced the ICER, but no change in any of them could change the model result. TC showed a 90% probability of being a cost-effective option at a WTP threshold of $37,654/QALY. In the 20 and 30-year time horizons, the results remained unchanged and TC remained cost-effective when the second-line treatment was switched to docetaxel.ConclusionAt a WTP threshold of $37,654 per QALY, TC was cost-effective compared to PC for patients with advanced NSCLC in China.

Project description:Gemcitabine combined with platinum/fluorouracil drugs is the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). We explored the safety and efficacy of toripalimab plus gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs. At a one-sided significance level of 0.025, a total of 50 patients could provide 80% power to show the efficacy at targeted progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months of 70% versus 40% for the combined treatment. This single-arm, phase II study enrolled 50 patients with advanced BTCs who previously received no systemic treatment. The regimen was as follows: toripalimab (240 mg, i.v., d1), gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, i.v., d1 and d8), and S-1 (40-60 mg bid p.o., d1-14, Q21d). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. The associations between response with PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genetic variations were explored. Patients were enrolled from January 2019 to August 2020, with a median follow-up time of 24.0 months (IQR: 4.3-31.0 months). The 6-month PFS rate was 62%. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.0-8.9 months), and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.6-18.4 months). Forty-nine patients completed the evaluation for tumor response. The ORR was 30.6% (95% CI: 17.2%-44.0%), and the disease control rate was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.2%-97.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (98.0%), neutropenia (92%), and anemia (86.0%). Grade III/IV TRAEs included leukopenia (38.0%), neutropenia (32%), skin rash (6%), anemia (2.0%), mucositis (2%), and immune-related colitis (2%). Among them, the grade III/IV immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were skin rash and colitis. In addition, biomarker analysis showed that negative PD-L1 expression and SMARCA4 mutation were significantly associated with worse survival outcomes, while no significant associations were observed for TP53, KRAS, or CDKN 2 A mutation as well as TMB. In conclusion, our data suggest that a regimen of toripalimab plus GS could improve PFS and OS with a good safety profile as a first-line treatment option for advanced BTC and warrants further verification.

Project description:BackgroundLenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but prognosis is still unsatisfactory. Recently, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining these three treatments may improve outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsThis was a retrospective study including patients treated with lenvatinib [8 mg (⩽60 kg) or 12 mg (>60 kg) once daily] or lenvatinib, toripalimab plus HAIC [LeToHAIC group, lenvatinib 0-1 week prior to initial HAIC, 240 mg toripalimab 0-1 day prior to every HAIC cycle, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h, every 3 weeks)]. Progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events were compared.ResultsFrom February 2019 to August 2019, 157 patients were included in this study: 71 in the LeToHAIC group and 86 in the lenvatinib group. The LeToHAIC group showed longer progression-free survival (11.1 versus 5.1 months, p < 0.001), longer overall survival (not reached versus 11 months, p < 0.001), and a higher objective response rate (RECIST: 59.2% versus 9.3%, p < 0.001; modified RECIST: 67.6% versus 16.3%, p < 0.001) than the lenvatinib group. In addition, 14.1% and 21.1% of patients in the LeToHAIC group achieved complete response of all lesions and complete response of the intrahepatic target lesions per modified RECIST criteria, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events that were more frequent in the LeToHAIC group than in the lenvatinib group included neutropenia (8.5% versus 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.6% versus 0), and nausea (5.6% versus 0).ConclusionsLenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival compared with lenvatinib alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Dataset Information

An advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient with epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutation responded to toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy after resistance to osimertinib: a case report.

Publications

An advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient with epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutation responded to toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy after resistance to osimertinib: a case report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets