Dataset Information

Patients' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treatment with the Pirfenidone 801 mg Tablet Formulation: A Multinational Survey.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, debilitating interstitial lung disease. Two antifibrotics, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are available for IPF treatment. Pirfenidone is available as 267 mg capsules and, more recently, as 267 mg and 801 mg tablets. The aim of this study was to examine the perceived benefits of the 801 mg formulation on patient quality of life (QoL), IPF management and pill burden.

Methods

Forty-seven patients with IPF and 170 healthcare professionals (HCPs; 150 physicians in France, Germany, Spain and the USA and 20 nurses in the USA) completed online questionnaires comprising 67 and 61 questions, respectively. Eligible patients had experience switching from the 267 mg pirfenidone tablet or capsule formulations to the 801 mg tablet formulation, and eligible HCPs were experienced in managing this switch. Questions included single and multiple responses and scalar questions with responses on a 7-point Likert scale.

Results

Patients received the 267 mg formulation for a median (range) of 6.0 (2.0-40.0) months prior to switching to the 801 mg formulation. Higher percentages of patients reported satisfaction with the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation for its convenience (64 vs. 17%) and number of dosage units (70 vs. 2%). More patients reported good emotional well-being on the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation (51 vs. 21%), and fewer patients reported missing a dose of pirfenidone (21 vs. 30%). More HCPs perceived high patient adherence with the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation (57 vs. 37%). Overall, 33% of physicians had experienced switching patients back to the 267 mg formulation.

Conclusion

Patients and HCPs consistently favoured the 801 mg formulation across multiple domains, including convenience, patient QoL and adherence. The 801 mg formulation may provide an alternative to the 267 mg formulation in patients established on the recommended daily dose of pirfenidone.

SUBMITTER: Lancaster LH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7229113 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of the study was to determine the various pharmacokinetic parameters of the newly developed cost-effective aceclofenac 100 mg tablet formulation (F-15) and to establish the bioequivalence against the marketed brand (ACEMED). Both products (test and reference) were given to 12 healthy non-smokers male subjects with overnight fasting of >10hr. The study was a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two sequence, and two treatment crossover design, with a washout period of 2 weeks. Blood samples (5 mL) from the human subjects were collected before (0 hr) and after drug administration at 13different time points (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 18 hrs). The drug plasma concentration was analyzed by a validated RP-HPLC method using a solvent system containing acetonitrile and deionized water (60:40% v/v). Linearity was found to be 0.999 over the drug concentration range of 50μg/mL to 0.05μg/mL with LLOQ and LOD of 0.05μg/mL and 0.025μg/mL respectively. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Kinetica® (ver. 5.1) software. Using the log-transformed data Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, AUMCtot, and MRT were calculated. The Cmax of the test and brand was found to be 8.629±1.251μg/mL and 8.478±0.913μg/mL. The AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of the test and the reference were computed to be 20.890 ±2.2021μg/mL.h, 23.272 ±1.914 μg/mL.h and 19.850 ±2.911 μg/mL.h, 22.890 ± 2.110 μg/mL.h correspondingly. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and two one-sided t-test (p>0.05; non-significant) were applied to assess the variation in the period, sequence, subjects, and treatment. Geometric mean ratios for above mentioned pharmacokinetic parameters of reference/test were found within the acceptable FDA limits of 80-125% using 90% CI. There was no inter and intrasubject variation (p> 0.05) that was observed. Therefore, the directly compressible aceclofenac (100 mg) test formulation and the commercial reference tablets were declared to be biosimilar.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Two antifibrotic drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone, are available for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although efficacy and adverse events have been well studied, little is known about patient experiences with these drugs. We aimed to systematically and quantitatively evaluate patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with nintedanib and pirfenidone. Furthermore, we assessed which factors were associated with overall patient satisfaction with medication. METHODS:Outpatients with IPF prospectively completed the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medication (PESaM) questionnaire before start, and after three and 6 months of antifibrotic treatment, as part of a randomized eHealth trial (NCT03420235). The PESaM questionnaire consists of an expectation module, a validated generic module evaluating patient experiences and satisfaction concerning the effectiveness, side-effects, and ease of use of a medication, and a disease-specific module about IPF. Satisfaction was scored on a scale from -?5 (very dissatisfied) to +?5 (very satisfied). RESULTS:In total, 90 patients were included, of whom 43% used nintedanib and 57% pirfenidone. After 6 months, the mean overall score for satisfaction with medication was 2.1 (SD 1.9). No differences were found in experiences and satisfaction with medication, and the number and severity of side-effects between nintedanib and pirfenidone. Perceived effectiveness of medication was rated as significantly more important than side-effects and ease of use (p?=?0.001). Expectations of patients regarding effectiveness were higher than experiences after 6 months. Self-reported experience with effectiveness was the main factor associated with overall medication satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS:Patient experiences and satisfaction with antifibrotic treatment were fairly positive, and similar for nintedanib and pirfenidone. Systematic evaluation of patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with medication could enhance shared-decision making and guide drug treatment decisions in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT03420235 .

Project description:BackgroundTwo antifibrotic drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone, are available for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although efficacy and adverse events have been well studied, little is known about patient experiences with these drugs. We aimed to systematically and quantitatively evaluate patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with nintedanib and pirfenidone. Furthermore, we assessed which factors were associated with overall patient satisfaction with medication.MethodsOutpatients with IPF prospectively completed the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medication (PESaM) questionnaire before start, and after three and 6 months of antifibrotic treatment, as part of a randomized eHealth trial (NCT03420235). The PESaM questionnaire consists of an expectation module, a validated generic module evaluating patient experiences and satisfaction concerning the effectiveness, side-effects, and ease of use of a medication, and a disease-specific module about IPF. Satisfaction was scored on a scale from - 5 (very dissatisfied) to + 5 (very satisfied).ResultsIn total, 90 patients were included, of whom 43% used nintedanib and 57% pirfenidone. After 6 months, the mean overall score for satisfaction with medication was 2.1 (SD 1.9). No differences were found in experiences and satisfaction with medication, and the number and severity of side-effects between nintedanib and pirfenidone. Perceived effectiveness of medication was rated as significantly more important than side-effects and ease of use (p = 0.001). Expectations of patients regarding effectiveness were higher than experiences after 6 months. Self-reported experience with effectiveness was the main factor associated with overall medication satisfaction.ConclusionsPatient experiences and satisfaction with antifibrotic treatment were fairly positive, and similar for nintedanib and pirfenidone. Systematic evaluation of patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with medication could enhance shared-decision making and guide drug treatment decisions in the future.Trial registrationNCT03420235 .

Project description:BackgroundPirfenidone is the first antifibrotic drug approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and it is used in the treatment of other interstitial pneumonias, such as unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) and connective tissue-related ILD. This study examined the efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with IPF and fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (f-iNSIP).MethodsIn a retrospective real-life study, 67 IPF and 24 f-iNSIP patients were enrolled and classified into a pirfenidone group and a non-antifibrotic group. The level of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months were recorded. The level of KL-6 in serum was detected by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The prognosis and safety outcomes were collected from patients.ResultsIn IPF patients, pirfenidone decreased the mean change of FVC and DLco, and decreased the proportion of patients with a ⩾10% decline in FVC or a ⩾15% decline in DLco compared with the non-antifibrotic group. There was no difference in the mean change of FVC and DLco between smokers and non-smokers who received pirfenidone treatment. There was an improvement in progression-free survival, defined as the time to the first occurrence of acute exacerbation or death related to pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, the ratio of patients who experienced acute exacerbation and death related to pulmonary fibrosis was lower in the pirfenidone group. There was no change in lung function and prognosis between the pirfenidone and non-antifibrotic groups in f-iNSIP patients. The KL-6 level slightly decreased after 1 year of pirfenidone treatment but not significantly. Gastrointestinal and skin-related adverse events were most common, and four patients ceased treatment due to the side effects.ConclusionsPirfenidone safely reduced disease progression by improving the lung function and progression-free survival in IPF patients, with acceptable side effects. The efficacy of pirfenidone on f-iNSIP was not significant, suggesting the need for further studies.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.