Dataset Information

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Methods

Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 day 1-5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival.

Results

Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3-4 adverse events in 25-30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93).

Conclusion

This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406).

SUBMITTER: Van Den Bent M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7229258 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Depatux-M is a n antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) specific to the activated conformation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. In the primary analysis on EORTC 1410 we reported a trend (p = 0.06) towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma treated with Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. We now present updated results. Material and Methods Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR-amplified glioblastoma at 1st recurrence after TMZ chemo-irradiation, occurring ?3 months after radiotherapy. Patients were randomized to either a) Depatux-M 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with TMZ 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either LOM or TMZ (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on day (d) 1 before and after dosing, d 4–7, d 1 course 2 before and after dosing, d 5–7 course 2, d 1 course 3, and then every 2 cycles. All available PK samples were used to calculate the Depatux-M average concentration during course 1 (CavgC1). The level of EGFR amplification was determined using both qPCR, next generation sequencing and FISH. Results In February 2018, an updated OS comparison with longer follow-up (median: 21 mo) performed after 220 observed deaths of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM using log-rank test and cox models stratified by stratification factors at randomization showed a HR of 0.68 (95%CI [0.48, 0.95]; p = 0.024) and 1-year OS rates of 40% versus 28%. In multivariate analysis including performance status, MGMT, surgery for recurrence, time from last TMZ to relapse and lesion diameter, CavgC1 was a significant predictor for OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.98], p = 0.0013). In Depatux-M treated patients, EGFR status (high vs low level amplification) did not correlate with OS. At the meeting further follow-up data will be presented obtained at database cleaning done > 24 months after the end of accrual allowing definitive analysis. Conclusion This updated OS analysis confirmed the OS improvement in EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma after treatment with of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ. In Depatux-M treated patients, higher drug levels during course 1 were associated with improved OS but high levels of EGFR amplification at first diagnosis were not.

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND Depatux-M is an antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) specific to the activated conformation of EGFR bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. In the primary analysis on EORTC 1410 we reported a trend (p = 0.06) towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-amplified (amp) recurrent glioblastoma treated with Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide. METHODS Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFRamp glioblastoma at 1st recurrence after temozolomide chemo-irradiation. Patients were randomized to either a) Depatux-M 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either lomustine or temozolomide (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Pharmacokinetic sampling was part of the study design, all samples were used to calculate the Depatux-M average concentration during course 1 (CavgC1). The level of EGFRamp was re-analysed using next generation sequencing. RESULTS In February 2018, an updated OS comparison performed after 220 observed deaths of Depatux-M in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM using log-rank test and cox models stratified by stratification factors at randomization showed a HR of 0.68 (95%CI [0.48, 0.95]; p = 0.024) and 1-year OS rates of 40% versus 28%. In multivariate analysis CavgC1 was a significant predictor for OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.98], p = 0.0013). In Depatux-M treated patients, EGFR status (high vs low level amplification) did not correlate with OS. At the meeting the follow-up from Aug 2018 will be presented, obtained more than 24 months after the end of accrual. CONCLUSION: This updated OS analysis of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide confirmed the OS improvement in EGFRamp recurrent glioblastoma. In Depatux-M treated patients, higher drug levels during course 1 were associated with improved OS, but high levels of EGFR amplification at first diagnosis were not.

Project description:BackgroundThe combination of galunisertib, a transforming growth factor (TGF)-? receptor (R)1 kinase inhibitor, and lomustine was found to have antitumor activity in murine models of glioblastoma.MethodsGalunisertib (300 mg/day) was given orally 14 days on/14 days off (intermittent dosing). Lomustine was given as approved. Patients were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to galunisertib + lomustine, galunisertib monotherapy, or placebo + lomustine. The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and antitumor activity.ResultsOne hundred fifty-eight patients were randomized: galunisertib + lomustine (N = 79), galunisertib (N = 39), and placebo + lomustine (N = 40). Baseline characteristics were: male (64.6%), white (75.3%), median age 58 years, ECOG performance status (PS) 1 (63.3%), and primary glioblastoma (93.7%). The PKs of galunisertib were not altered with lomustine, and galunisertib had a median half-life of ?8 hours. Median OS in months (95% credible interval [CrI]) for galunisertib + lomustine was 6.7 (range: 5.3-8.5), 8.0 (range: 5.7-11.7) for galunisertib alone, and 7.5 (range: 5.6-10.3) for placebo + lomustine. There was no difference in OS for patients treated with galunisertib + lomustine compared with placebo + lomustine [P (HR < 1) = 26%]. Median progression-free survival of ?2 months was observed in all 3 arms. Among 8 patients with IDH1 mutation, 7 patients were treated with galunisertib (monotherapy or with lomustine); OS ranged from 4 to 17 months. Patients treated with galunisertib alone had fewer drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events (n = 34) compared with lomustine-treated patients (10% vs 26%). Baseline PS, post-discontinuation of bevacizumab, tumor size, and baseline levels of MDC/CCL22 were correlated with OS.ConclusionsGalunisertib + lomustine failed to demonstrate improved OS relative to placebo + lomustine. Efficacy outcomes were similar in all 3 arms.Clinical trial registrationNCT01582269, ClinicalTrials.gov.