Dataset Information

Statistical tests for latent class in censored data due to detection limit.

ABSTRACT: Measures of substance concentration in urine, serum or other biological matrices often have an assay limit of detection. When concentration levels fall below the limit, the exact measures cannot be obtained. Instead, the measures are censored as only partial information that the levels are under the limit is known. Assuming the concentration levels are from a single population with a normal distribution or follow a normal distribution after some transformation, Tobit regression models, or censored normal regression models, are the standard approach for analyzing such data. However, in practice, it is often the case that the data can exhibit more censored observations than what would be expected under the Tobit regression models. One common cause is the heterogeneity of the study population, caused by the existence of a latent group of subjects who lack the substance measured. For such subjects, the measurements will always be under the limit. If a censored normal regression model is appropriate for modeling the subjects with the substance, the whole population follows a mixture of a censored normal regression model and a degenerate distribution of the latent class. While there are some studies on such mixture models, a fundamental question about testing whether such mixture modeling is necessary, i.e. whether such a latent class exists, has not been studied yet. In this paper, three tests including Wald test, likelihood ratio test and score test are developed for testing the existence of such latent class. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the tests, and two real data examples are employed to illustrate the tests.

SUBMITTER: He H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7231674 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Statistical tests for latent class in censored data due to detection limit.

He Hua H Tang Wan W Kelly Tanika T Li Shengxu S He Jiang J

Statistical methods in medical research 20191118 8

Measures of substance concentration in urine, serum or other biological matrices often have an assay limit of detection. When concentration levels fall below the limit, the exact measures cannot be obtained. Instead, the measures are censored as only partial information that the levels are under the limit is known. Assuming the concentration levels are from a single population with a normal distribution or follow a normal distribution after some transformation, Tobit regression models, or censor ...[more]

PMID: 31736411

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe diagnosis of canine echinococcosis can be a challenge in surveillance studies because there is no perfect gold standard that can be used routinely. However, unknown test specificities and sensitivities can be overcome using latent-class analysis with appropriate data.MethodologyWe utilised a set of faecal and purge samples used previously to explore the epidemiology of canine echinococcosis on the Tibetan plateau. Previously only the purge results were reported and analysed in a largely deterministic way. In the present study, additional diagnostic tests of copro-PCR and copro-antigen ELISA were undertaken on the faecal samples. This enabled a Bayesian analysis in a latent-class model to examine the diagnostic performance of a genus specific copro-antigen ELISA, species-specific copro-PCR and arecoline purgation. Potential covariates including co-infection with Taenia, age and sex of the dog were also explored. The dependence structure of these diagnostic tests could also be analysed.Principle findingsThe most parsimonious result, indicated by deviance-information criteria, suggested that co-infection with Taenia spp. was a significant covariate with the Echinococcus infection. The copro-PCRs had estimated sensitivities of 89% and 84% respectively for the diagnoses of Echinococcus multilocularis and E. granulosus. The specificities for the copro-PCR were estimated at 93 and 83% respectively. Copro-antigen ELISA had sensitivities of 55 and 57% for the diagnosis of E. multilocularis and E. granulosus and specificities of 71 and 69% respectively. Arecoline purgation with an assumed specificity of 100% had estimated sensitivities of 76% and 85% respectively.SignificanceThis study also shows that incorporating diagnostic uncertainty, in other words assuming no perfect gold standard, and including potential covariates like sex or Taenia co-infection into the epidemiological analysis may give different results than if the diagnosis of infection status is assumed to be deterministic and this approach should therefore be used whenever possible.

Project description:Microarray technology has enabled the measurement of comprehensive transcriptomic information. However, each data entry may reflect trivial individual differences among samples and also contain technical noise. Therefore, the certainty of each observed difference should be confirmed at earlier steps of the analyses, and statistical tests are frequently used for this purpose. Since a microarray measures a huge number of genes and the results are processed simultaneously, concerns regarding problems of multiplicity have been raised to the tests. To deal with these problems, several methodologies have been proposed, making the tests very conservative. Indeed, arbitrary tuning of the test threshold has also been introduced to relax the test conditions. However, the appropriateness of the multiplicity problems as well as the compensation methods has not been confirmed. The appropriateness of the compensation methods was checked by means of coincidence of the premises of the methodologies with the observed characteristics found in real data of two typical platforms of microarray analysis. Normality was observed in within-group data variations, supporting applications of parametric tests. However, genes displayed their own tendencies in the magnitude of variations, and the distributions of P-values were rather complex and varied; these characteristics are inconsistent with the premises of the compensation methodologies. Additionally, the appropriateness of the proposed multiplicities is reconsidered. When we observed differences in the transcriptome, the family-wise error rate should not be considered, since analyses at higher levels would not be influenced by a few false positives among the huge numbers of true information. Likely, concerns for a false discovery rate are not suitable for the point null hypotheses on expression levels, since the rate of true null hypotheses should be rare in contradiction to the premise of the methodology. Although compensation methods have been recommended to deal with the problem of multiplicity, the compensations are actually inappropriate for many of the applications of transcriptome analyses. Compensations are not only unnecessary, but will increase the occurrence of false negative errors, and arbitrary adjustment of the threshold damages the objectivity of the tests. Rather, the results of parametric tests should be evaluated directly. This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

Dataset Information

Statistical tests for latent class in censored data due to detection limit.

Publications

Statistical tests for latent class in censored data due to detection limit.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets