Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhang X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7233005 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May-Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Zhang Xuebao X Chi Nan N Sun Miao M Shan Zhengfei Z Zhang Yulian Y Cui Yuanshan Y
American journal of men's health 20200501 3
The purpose of this analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). A comprehensive search was performed to ascertain from trials about PDE5Is for the treatment of PE and compare the results, including intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IVELT), score of sexual satisfaction scale, and side effects, between the group treated with PDE5Is and that treated with placebo. Seven studies involving a total of 471 ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ContextPhosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) are prescribed off-label for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).ObjectiveTo systematically review the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for PDE5-Is in the management of PE.Evidence acquisitionMedline and other databases were searched through September 2015. Quality of RCTs was assessed. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) data were pooled in a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed.Evidence synthesisFifteen RCTs were included. The majority were of unclear methodological quality. Pooled IELT evidence suggests that PDE5-Is are significantly more effective than placebo (231 participants, p<0.00001), that there is no difference between PDE5-Is and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 405 participants, p=0.50), and that PDE5-Is combined with an SSRI are significantly more effective than SSRIs alone (521 participants, p=0.001); however, high levels of statistical heterogeneity are evident (I2 ≥ 40%). Single-RCT evidence suggests that sildenafil is significantly more effective than the squeeze technique, but both lidocaine gel and tramadol are significantly more effective than sildenafil. Sildenafil combined with behavioural therapy is significantly more effective than behavioural therapy alone. Sexual satisfaction and ejaculatory control appear to be better with PDE5-Is compared with placebo and with PDE5-Is combined with an SSRI compared with an SSRI alone. Adverse events are reported with both PDE5-Is and other agents.ConclusionsPDE5-Is are significantly more effective than placebo and PDE5-Is combined with an SSRI are significantly more effective than SSRIs alone at increasing IELT and improving other effectiveness outcomes; however, heterogeneity is evident across RCTs. The methodological quality of the majority of RCTs is unclear.Patient summaryWe reviewed phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) for treating premature ejaculation. We found evidence to suggest that PDE5-Is are effective compared with placebo and that PDE5-Is combined with an SSRI are more effective than an SSRI alone. Adverse events are reported with PDE5-Is and other agents; however, the quality of the evidence is uncertain.Trial registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42013005289.
| S-EPMC5503121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe performed the network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review involved all evidence from relevant trials to compare the efficiency and safety of various types of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients with premature ejaculation (PE).MethodsWe conducted comprehensive searches of peer-reviewed and grey literature. PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to June 1, 2017. The primary outcome was intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IVELT) and adverse effects (AEs). We performed pairwise meta-analyses by random effects model and network meta-analysis by Bayesian model. We used the GRADE framework to assess the quality of evidence contributing to each network estimate.ResultsOf 3046 titles and abstracts initially identified, 17 trials reporting 5739 participants were included. Considering IVELT in the NMA, paroxetine plus sildenafil and sildenafil alone are both superior to placebo (MD: 1.75, 95% CrI: 0.05 to 3.78; MD 1.43, 95% CrI 0.003 to 2.81). Sildenafil is superior to sertraline (MD: 1.63, 95% CrI: 0.10 to 2.79). Considering AEs, placebo demonstrated obviously lower risk comparing to paroxetine, sildenafil and paroxetine plus sildenafil (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.52; OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.80; OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.92). Compared with tadalafil plus paroxetine, dapoxetine showed significantly less AEs (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96).ConclusionsOur study concluded that although paroxetine plus sildenafil and sildenafil alone both demonstrated significant IVELT benefit compared with placebo, significant increase of AEs risk was also observed. Furthermore, sildenafil alone was superior to sertraline in efficacy with comparable tolerability.
| S-EPMC6310608 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTramadol is a centrally acting analgesic prescribed off-label for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). However, tramadol may cause addiction and difficulty in breathing and the beneficial effect of tramadol in PE is yet not supported by a high level of evidence. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCT) for tramadol in the management of PE.MethodsWe searched bibliographic databases including MEDLINE to August 2014 for RCTs. The primary outcome was intra-vaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT). Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. Between-group differences in IELT and other outcomes were pooled across RCTs in a meta-analysis. Statistical and clinical between-trial heterogeneity was assessed.ResultsA total of eight RCTs that evaluated tramadol against a comparator were included. The majority of RCTs were of unclear methodological quality due to limited reporting. Pooled evidence (four RCTs, 721 participants), suggests that tramadol is significantly more effective than placebo at increasing IELT over eight to 12 weeks (p = 0.0007). However, a high level of statistical heterogeneity is evident (I-squared = 74%). Single RCT evidence indicates that tramadol is significantly more effective than paroxetine taken on-demand, sildenafil, lidocaine gel, or behavioural therapy on IELT in men with PE. Tramadol is associated with significantly more adverse events including: erectile dysfunction, constipation, nausea, headache, somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, pruritus, and vomiting, than placebo or behavioural therapy over eight to 12 weeks of treatment. However, addiction problems or breathing difficulties reported by patients for PE is not assessed in the current evidence base.ConclusionsTramadol appears effective in the treatment of PE. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the observed levels of between-trial heterogeneity and the reporting quality of the available evidence. The variability across placebo-controlled trials in terms of the tramadol dose evaluated and the treatment duration does not permit any assessment of a safe and effective minimum daily dose. The long-term effects and side effects, including addiction potential, for men with PE have not been evaluated in the current evidence base.Trial registrationThe review is registered on PROSPERO 2013: CRD42013005289 .
| S-EPMC4417346 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Background Although acupuncture is widely used to treat premature ejaculation (PE), its effectiveness remains highly controversial. Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture on PE. Methods According to the relevant keywords, 11 major English and Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture alone or in combination with other treatments for PE. The quality of evidence across studies was assessed by the GRADEpro tool. Outcomes Study outcome measures included the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), the Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation–5 (CIPE-5), treatment success rate, and adverse events. Results Seven trials were included in this review for a total of 603 participants. A low quality of evidence suggests that it is not possible to determine whether acupuncture, as compared with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has an advantage in improving the IELT (standardized mean difference [SMD], −1.75; 95% CI, −6.12 to 2.63; P = .43, I2 = 98%), PEDT scores (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, −0.68 to 1.32; P = .53, I2 = 85%), and treatment success rate (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-1.14; P = .15). However, participants receiving acupuncture had a lower CIPE-5 (SMD, −1.06; 95% CI, −1.68 to −0.44; P < .01). As compared with sham acupuncture, acupuncture significantly improved the IELT (SMD, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01-1.92; P < .01, I2 = 0%) and PEDT scores (SMD, −1.23; 95% CI, −1.78 to −0.67; P < .01, I2 = 37%). When compared with other treatments alone, a combined treatment with acupuncture can significantly improve the IELT (SMD, 7.06; 95% CI, 2.53-11.59; P < .01, I2 = 97%), CIPE-5 (SMD, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.45-1.22; P < .01, I2 = 0%), and treatment success rate (SMD, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.18-2.16; P < .01, I2 = 53). Clinical Implications The results suggest a significant effect of acupuncture in the treatment of certain important indicators of PE; however, this finding needs to be treated with caution because of the quality of the RCTs included. Strengths and Limitations Comprehensive inclusion of available RCTs has been performed. However, limitations include a low number of studies and a lack of detailed information to allow subgroup analysis. Conclusion The present systematic review and meta-analysis show that acupuncture has a significant effect on several subjective PE parameters, such as improving the feeling of control over ejaculation and distress, particularly when used in an integrated way. However, due to the low quality of evidence, acupuncture still needs larger well-designed RCTs to be confirmed.
| S-EPMC10308367 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPremature ejaculation (PE) is the most prevalent male sexual dysfunction. Epidemiologic findings are inconsistent concerning the risk for depression associated with PE.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between between depression and risk of PE.Data sourcesWe conducted a literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from these databases' inception through June 2014 for observational epidemiological studies examining the association between depression on risk of PE.Study eligibility criteriaStudies were selected if they reported the risk estimates for PE associated with depression.Participantspatients>18 years of age suffering from PE.Interventionsa history of depressive disorder.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsThese odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random or fixed effects model and were tested for heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was employed to explore heterogeneity.ResultsEight trials involving 18,035 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Depression were statistically significantly associated with the risk of PE (OR = 1.63, 95% CI:1.42-1.87). There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (P = 0.623, I = 0.0%). The association was similar when stratified by mean age, geographical area, study design, sample size, publication year, and controlling key confounders.LimitationsThe severity of depression and PE could not be identified due to unavailable data of trials. No evidence of publication bias was observed.ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence that depression is associated with a significantly increased risk of PE. In addition, more prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the association and identify the ideal treatment.Systematic review registration numberCRD42016041272.
| S-EPMC5008563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPremature ejaculation (PE) is defined by short ejaculatory latency and inability to delay ejaculation causing distress. Management may involve behavioral and/or pharmacological approaches.AimTo systematically review the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for behavioral therapies in the management of PE.MethodsNine databases including MEDLINE were searched up to August 2014. Included RCTs compared behavioral therapy against waitlist control or another therapy, or behavioral plus drug therapy against drug treatment alone. [Correction added on 10 September 2015, after first online publication: Search period has been amended from August 2013 to August 2014.].Main outcome measureIntravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), sexual satisfaction, ejaculatory control, and anxiety and adverse effects.ResultsTen RCTs (521 participants) were included. Overall risk of bias was unclear. All studies assessed physical techniques, including squeeze and stop-start, sensate focus, stimulation device, and pelvic floor rehabilitation. Only one RCT included a psychotherapeutic approach (combined with stop-start and drug treatment). Four trials compared behavioral therapies against waitlist control, of which two (involving squeeze, stop-start, and sensate focus) reported IELT differences of 7-9 minutes, whereas two (web-based sensate focus, stimulation device) reported no difference in ejaculatory latency posttreatment. For other outcomes (sexual satisfaction, desire, and self-confidence), some waitlist comparisons significantly favored behavioral therapy, whereas others were not significant. Three trials favored combined behavioral and drug treatment over drug treatment alone, with small but significant differences in IELT (0.5-1 minute) and significantly better results on other outcomes (sexual satisfaction, ejaculatory control, and anxiety). Direct comparisons of behavioral therapy vs. drug treatment gave mixed results, mostly either favoring drug treatment or showing no significant difference. No adverse effects were reported, though safety data were limited.ConclusionsThere is limited evidence that physical behavioral techniques for PE improve IELT and other outcomes over waitlist and that behavioral therapies combined with drug treatments give better outcomes than drug treatments alone. Further RCTs are required to assess psychotherapeutic approaches to PE.
| S-EPMC4599555 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA rigorous and focused systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of individualised homeopathic treatment has not previously been undertaken. We tested the hypothesis that the outcome of an individualised homeopathic treatment approach using homeopathic medicines is distinguishable from that of placebos.MethodsThe review's methods, including literature search strategy, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias and statistical analysis, were strictly protocol-based. Judgment in seven assessment domains enabled a trial's risk of bias to be designated as low, unclear or high. A trial was judged to comprise 'reliable evidence' if its risk of bias was low or was unclear in one specified domain. 'Effect size' was reported as odds ratio (OR), with arithmetic transformation for continuous data carried out as required; OR > 1 signified an effect favouring homeopathy.ResultsThirty-two eligible RCTs studied 24 different medical conditions in total. Twelve trials were classed 'uncertain risk of bias', three of which displayed relatively minor uncertainty and were designated reliable evidence; 20 trials were classed 'high risk of bias'. Twenty-two trials had extractable data and were subjected to meta-analysis; OR = 1.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.91). For the three trials with reliable evidence, sensitivity analysis revealed OR = 1.98 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.38).ConclusionsMedicines prescribed in individualised homeopathy may have small, specific treatment effects. Findings are consistent with sub-group data available in a previous 'global' systematic review. The low or unclear overall quality of the evidence prompts caution in interpreting the findings. New high-quality RCT research is necessary to enable more decisive interpretation.
| S-EPMC4326322 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionClomipramine is effective in treating premature ejaculation, a common form of male sexual dysfunction that affects individual's mental health and quality of life, but its optimal dosage remains controversial.AimIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of clomipramine for treating premature ejaculation among men.MethodsEligible studies of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were identified from the date of inception to June 21, 2020. We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data of the study characteristics, intravaginal latency ejaculatory time (IELT), adverse events, success rate, and satisfaction rate of clomipramine vs placebo were extracted and analyzed. The risk ratio and mean difference were used for quantitatively analyzing binary outcomes and continuous outcomes. The standardized mean difference was applied to the outcome of satisfaction rate. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used for meta-analysis under random-effects model. To assess dose effect of clomipramine, a meta-regression analysis was performed.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were the IELT and adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were the success rate and satisfaction rate of clomipramine treatment relative to the placebo.ResultsA total 14 randomized controlled trials with 710 patients were included for quantitative analysis. Clomipramine significantly increased the IELT compared with the placebo (mean difference: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.73-2.21). However, clomipramine was associated with higher risks of overall adverse events and adverse events in the nervous and respiratory systems. Significant dosage effects on the IELT (estimate: 0.0637, 95% CI: 0.0074-0.12) and a slightly increasing slope on adverse events were revealed.ConclusionClomipramine increased the IELT and yielded greater satisfaction than the placebo, and the higher dose results in a superior IELT without leading to higher risk of adverse events under a dosage of 50-mg clomipramine. Wu P-C, Hung C-S, Kang Y-N, et al. Tolerability and Optimal Therapeutic Dosage of Clomipramine for Premature Ejaculation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Med 2021;9:100283.
| S-EPMC7930847 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPremature ejaculation (PE) is defined as ejaculation within 1 minute (lifelong PE) or 3 minutes (acquired PE), inability to delay ejaculation, and negative personal consequences. Management includes behavioral and pharmacologic approaches.AimTo systematically review effectiveness, safety, and robustness of evidence for complementary and alternative medicine in managing PE.MethodsNine databases including Medline were searched through September 2015. Randomized controlled trials evaluating complementary and alternative medicine for PE were included.Main outcome measuresStudies were included if they reported on intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and/or another validated PE measurement. Adverse effects were summarized.ResultsTen randomized controlled trials were included. Two assessed acupuncture, five assessed Chinese herbal medicine, one assessed Ayurvedic herbal medicine, and two assessed topical "severance secret" cream. Risk of bias was unclear in all studies because of unclear allocation concealment or blinding, and only five studies reported stopwatch-measured IELT. Acupuncture slightly increased IELT over placebo in one study (mean difference [MD] = 0.55 minute, P = .001). In another study, Ayurvedic herbal medicine slightly increased IELT over placebo (MD = 0.80 minute, P = .001). Topical severance secret cream increased IELT over placebo in two studies (MD = 8.60 minutes, P < .001), although inclusion criteria were broad (IELT < 3 minutes). Three studies comparing Chinese herbal medicine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) favored SSRIs (MD = 1.01 minutes, P = .02). However, combination treatment with Chinese medicine plus SSRIs improved IELT over SSRIs alone (two studies; MD = 1.92 minutes, P < .00001) and over Chinese medicine alone (two studies; MD = 2.52 minutes, P < .00001). Adverse effects were not consistently assessed but where reported were generally mild.ConclusionThere is preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, Ayurvedic herbal medicine, and topical severance secret cream in improving IELT and other outcomes. However, results are based on clinically heterogeneous studies of unclear quality. There are sparse data on adverse effects or potential for drug interactions. Further well-conducted randomized controlled trials would be valuable.
| S-EPMC5302385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundChronic painful conditions have an important influence on the ability to work. Work-related outcomes, however, are not commonly reported in publications on trials investigating the treatment of chronic painful conditions. We aim to provide an overview of the reporting of work-related outcomes in such trials and investigate the relationship between work-related outcomes and pain outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed with the aim of identifying randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating treatments for chronic painful conditions or rheumatic diseases that also reported on work-related outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Oxford Quality Scale (OQS). Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of interference with work and number of patients with at least 30% reduction in pain intensity (30% pain responders). The correlation between work-related and pain outcomes was investigated with regression analyses.ResultsWe included 31 publications reporting on 27 datasets from randomised placebo-controlled trials (with a total of 11,434 study participants) conducted in chronic painful or rheumatic diseases and reporting on work-related outcomes. These 31 publications make up only about 0.2% of all publications on randomised placebo-controlled trials in such conditions. The methodological quality of the included studies was high; only nine studies scored less than four (out of a maximum five) points on the OQS. Sixteen different work-related outcomes were reported on in the studies. Of 25 studies testing for the statistical significance of changes in work-related outcomes over the course of the trials, 14 (56%) reported a significant improvement; the others reported non-significant changes. Eight studies reported data on both interference with work and 30% pain responders: meta-analyses demonstrated similar, statistically significant improvements in both these outcomes with active therapy compared to placebo and regression analysis showed that these outcomes were correlated.ConclusionsDespite the importance of pain as a reason for decreased ability to work, work-related outcomes are reported in substantially less than 1% of publications on placebo-controlled trials in chronic painful and rheumatic diseases. Work-related outcomes and pain responder outcomes are closely related.
| S-EPMC4107475 | biostudies-literature