Dataset Information

Interstitial Lung Disease in Relatives of Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis.

ABSTRACT: Rationale: Although relatives of patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) are at an increased risk for interstitial lung disease (ILD), the risk among relatives of sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is not known.Objectives: To identify the prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and ILD among relatives of patients with FPF and sporadic IPF.Methods: Undiagnosed first-degree relatives of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (PF) consented to participate in a screening study that included the completion of questionnaires, pulmonary function testing, chest computed tomography, a blood sample collection for immunophenotyping, telomere length assessments, and genetic testing.Measurements and Main Results: Of the 105 relatives in the study, 33 (31%) had ILA, whereas 72 (69%) were either indeterminate or had no ILA. Of the 33 relatives with ILA, 19 (58%) had further evidence for ILD (defined by the combination of imaging findings and pulmonary function testing decrements). There was no evidence in multivariable analyses that the prevalence of either ILA or ILD differed between the 46 relatives with FPF and the 59 relatives with sporadic IPF. Relatives with decrements in either total lung or diffusion capacity had a greater than 9-fold increase in their odds of having ILA (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-29.8; P < 0.001).Conclusions: An undiagnosed form of ILD may be present in greater than 1 in 6 older first-degree relatives of patients with PF. First-degree relatives of patients with both familial and sporadic IPF appear to be at similar risk. Our findings suggest that screening for PF in relatives might be warranted.

SUBMITTER: Hunninghake GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7233344 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA number of genetic markers linked to familial pulmonary fibrosis predict differential survival in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Although genetic testing is not performed routinely for ILD, family history commonly is obtained and may inform outcome risk.Research questionDoes survival vary between patients with and without self-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis?MethodsFamily history was acquired systematically for consecutive ILD patients who consented to clinical registry enrollment at the University of Texas Southwestern and the University of California at Davis. Patients were stratified by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF ILD diagnosis and were substratified by presence or absence of familial pulmonary fibrosis, defined as one or more additional affected family members. Transplant-free survival was compared using multilevel, mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOf the 1,262 patients included, 534 (42%) had IPF ILD and 728 (58%) had non-IPF ILD. Of those with non-IPF ILD, 18.5% had connective tissue disease, 15.6% had chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and 23.5% had unclassifiable ILD. Familial pulmonary fibrosis was reported in 134 IPF ILD patients (25.1%) and 90 non-IPF ILD patients (12.4%). Those with familial IPF showed an 80% increased risk of death or transplantation compared with those with sporadic IPF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.37-2.37; P < .001), whereas those with familial non-IPF ILD showed a twofold increased risk compared with their counterparts with sporadic disease (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.46-2.96; P < .001). Outcome risk among those with familial non-IPF ILD was no different than for those with sporadic IPF ILD (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.89-1.84; P = .19).InterpretationPatient-reported familial pulmonary fibrosis is predictive of reduced transplant-free survival in IPF and non-IPF ILD patients. Because survival among patients with familial non-IPF ILD approximates that of sporadic IPF ILD, early intervention should be considered for such patients. Until clinical genetic testing is widely available and provides actionable results, family history should be ascertained and considered in risk stratification.

Project description:BackgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) is a validated measure of HRQL, but no previous studies have focused on the validity of K-BILD in IPF. Moreover, the relationship between K-BILD and dyspnoea or the 6-min walk test (6MWT) has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to validate K-BILD in the largest cohort of patients with IPF to date and assess how K-BILD correlates to dyspnoea and 6MWT.MethodsFirstly, K-BILD was translated into Danish using validated translation procedures. Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. At baseline, patients completed K-BILD, the IPF-specific version of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) Short Form-36, and pulmonary function tests and 6MWT were performed. After 14 days, K-BILD and Global Rating of Change Scales were completed. Internal consistency, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and known groups validity were assessed. Analyses were also performed in subgroups of patients with different time since diagnosis.ResultsAt baseline, 150 patients with IPF completed the questionnaires, and 139 patients completed the questionnaires after 14 days. K-BILD had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92). The concurrent validity was strong compared to SOBQ (r = - 0.66) and moderate compared to 6MWT (r = 0.43). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.91) and a Bland Altman plot demonstrated a good reliability. K-BILD was also able to discriminate between patients with different stages of disease (p < 0.002, Δscore > 7.4) and most results were comparable in patients with different time since diagnosis.ConclusionK-BILD is a valid and reliable instrument in patients with IPF and in patients with different time since diagnosis. To a major extent, K-BILD scores reflected the impact of dyspnoea on HRQL and the impact of physical functional capacity measured by the 6MWT to a moderate degree. Compared to PFTs alone, K-BILD provides additional information on the burden of living with IPF, and importantly, K-BILD is simple to implement in both research and clinical contexts.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.org (NCT02818712) on 30 June 2016.

Project description:Background Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease often causes fatal respiratory deterioration in lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease. Here, we examined whether the maximum standardized uptake value of a contralateral interstitial lesion was a predictive factor of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease within 30 days postoperatively in lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease who underwent pulmonary resection. Methods Overall, 117 consecutive lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease who underwent pulmonary resection between August 2010 and April 2019 at the Kumamoto University Hospital were retrospectively analysed for the association between the maximum standardized uptake value of the contralateral interstitial lesions and interstitial lung disease parameters. Results The median maximum standardized uptake value of contralateral interstitial lesions was 1.61, which was regarded as the cut-off point predictive of the incidence of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease. Eight patients developed postoperative acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease. There was no significant association between the maximum standardized uptake value of the contralateral interstitial lesions and postoperative acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease. The maximum standardized uptake value was weakly but significantly associated with lactate dehydrogenase levels (r=0.211, P=0.022), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (r=0.208, P=0.028), and % diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (r=-0.290, P=0.002). Moreover, seven patients developed acute exacerbation of the interstitial lung disease during the clinical course after 30 postoperative days, and the incidence rate of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease was significantly higher in the high maximum standardized uptake value group (≥1.61) than in the low maximum standardised uptake value group (<1.61) (12.7% vs. 0%, P=0.002, Gray’s test). Conclusions Maximum standardized uptake value was not a predictor of postoperative acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease after pulmonary resection, but could be a predictive tool of an association with interstitial lung disease severity and activity markers.

Dataset Information

Interstitial Lung Disease in Relatives of Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets