Dataset Information

S74. AEROBIC EXERCISE AND COGNITIVE REMEDIATION IN MULTIEPISODE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS: FROM A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

ABSTRACT: Abstract Background Cognitive remediation (CR) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Although the effectiveness of CR is well stablished, its effects are modest, especially in terms of functional outcome. There is an emerging literature suggesting that adding aerobic exercise to CR may exert synergistic effects. Despite these promising reports, the extent to which aerobic exercise in combination with CRT can improve cognitive and daily functioning in multiepisode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder remains unclear. Methods This is a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial (NCT02864576) with two different groups: 1) patients with multiepisode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving 3-month Aerobic exercise plus CR treatment (three weekly sessions, 40min of Aerobic exercise and 90min of CR), and 2) patients with multiepisode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving Healthy lifestyle promotion plus CR treatment (three weekly sessions, 40min of Healthy lifestyle promotion and 90min of CR). Primary outcome measures were the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), which were assessed (among others) at baseline and immediately after treatment. For the present work, the sample included in the analysis were 34 patients for whom cognitive data were available. Treatment effects on neurocognition and functional outcome were analyzed by applying the multivariate general linear model (GLM) repeated measures. Results After treatment, both groups exhibited a significant improvement in MCCB visual learning memory (F=14.298, p= 0.001), working memory (F=6.626, p= 0.015) and speed of processing (F=16.344, p= 0.001) domains. However, no significant benefits were evidenced for problem solving (F=2.143, p= 0.153), verbal learning memory (F= 0.321, p= 0.575) and attention/vigilance (F=0.740, p= 0.397) domains. Functional outcome, as measured by the GAF, was more improved in the Aerobic exercise plus CR group than in the Healthy lifestyle promotion plus CR group (F=4.248, p= 0.047). Discussion Our preliminary findings indicate that combining aerobic exercise with cognitive remediation may promote a large impact on functional outcome in patients with multiepisode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

SUBMITTER: Pujol N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7234152 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Evidence is accumulating that cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) is an effective intervention for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. To date there has been no randomised controlled trial (RCT) cohort study of cognitive remediation within a forensic hospital. The goal of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a trial of cognitive remediation for forensic mental health patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS:An estimated sixty patients will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomised to one of two conditions: CRT with treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU. CRT will consist of 42 individual sessions and 14 group sessions. The primary outcome measure for this study is change in cognitive functioning using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Secondary outcomes include change in social and occupational functioning, disorganised symptoms, negative symptoms, violence, participation in psychosocial treatment and recovery. In addition to these effectiveness measures, we will examine patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION:Cognitive difficulties experienced by schizophrenia spectrum patients are associated with general functioning, ability to benefit from psychosocial interventions and quality of life. Research into the treatment of cognitive difficulties within a forensic setting is therefore an important priority. The results of the proposed study will help answer the question whether cognitive remediation improves functional outcomes in forensic mental health patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Forensic mental health patients are detained for the dual purpose of receiving treatment and for public protection. There can be conflict between these two roles perhaps causing forensic services to have an increased length of stay compared to general psychiatric admissions. Ultimately a focus on emphasising cognition and general functioning over symptoms may decrease tension between the core responsibilities of forensic mental health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02360813. Trial registered Feb 4th 2015 and last updated May 1(st) 2015.

Project description:IntroductionHead-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics have predominantly included patients with chronic conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia.MethodsThe study was an 8-week, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, controlled multicenter trial (NCT00145444). Seventy-six patients with schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (diagnosis < 5 y), and a maximum lifetime antipsychotic treatment < 16 weeks participated in the study. Efficacy of ziprasidone (80-160 mg/d) and olanzapine 10-20 mg was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and the Heinrich Quality of Life Scale (HQLS); tolerability assessments included laboratory assessments, body weight, and electroencephalogram.ResultsOlanzapine (n = 34) and ziprasidone (n = 39) showed equal efficacy as measured by the PANSS, CDSS, CGI, and HQLS. However, mean weight gain was significantly higher in the olanzapine group (6.8 vs 0.1 kg, P < .001). Ziprasidone was associated with decreasing levels of triglycerides, cholesterol, and transaminases, while these parameters increased in the olanzapine group (all P values < .05). There were no significant differences in fasting glucose and prolactin levels or in cardiac or sexual side effects. Patients on ziprasidone used biperiden for extrapyramidal side effects more frequently (P < .05).DiscussionThe results of this study indicate that ziprasidone and olanzapine have comparable therapeutic efficacy but differ in their side effect profile. However, there is a risk of a type II error with this sample size. Clinically significant weight gain and laboratory abnormalities appear early after initiating treatment and are more prominent with olanzapine, while more patients on ziprasidone received anticholinergic drugs to treat extrapyramidal symptoms.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of a progressive aerobic exercise training program on cognitive and everyday function among adults with mild subcortical ischemic vascular cognitive impairment (SIVCI).MethodsThis was a proof-of-concept single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month, thrice-weekly, progressive aerobic exercise training program (AT) with usual care plus education on cognitive and everyday function with a follow-up assessment 6 months after the formal cessation of aerobic exercise training. Primary outcomes assessed were general cognitive function (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale [ADAS-Cog]), executive functions (Executive Interview [EXIT-25]), and activities of daily living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living [ADCS-ADL]).ResultsSeventy adults randomized to aerobic exercise training or usual care were included in intention-to-treat analyses (mean age 74 years, 51% female, n = 35 per group). At the end of the intervention, the aerobic exercise training group had significantly improved ADAS-Cog performance compared with the usual care plus education group (-1.71 point difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.15 to -0.26, p = 0.02); however, this difference was not significant at the 6-month follow-up (-0.63 point difference, 95% CI -2.34 to 1.07, p = 0.46). There were no significant between-group differences at intervention completion and at the 6-month follow-up in EXIT-25 or ADCS-ADL performance. Examination of secondary measures showed between-group differences at intervention completion favoring the AT group in 6-minute walk distance (30.35 meter difference, 95% CI 5.82 to 54.86, p = 0.02) and in diastolic blood pressure (-6.89 mm Hg difference, 95% CI -12.52 to -1.26, p = 0.02).ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of 6 months of thrice-weekly progressive aerobic training in community-dwelling adults with mild SIVCI, relative to usual care plus education.Clinicaltrialsgov identifierNCT01027858.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for adults with mild SIVCI, an aerobic exercise program for 6 months results in a small, significant improvement in ADAS-Cog performance.

Dataset Information

S74. AEROBIC EXERCISE AND COGNITIVE REMEDIATION IN MULTIEPISODE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS: FROM A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets