Dataset Information

Selective neural electrical stimulation restores hand and forearm movements in individuals with complete tetraplegia.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:We hypothesized that a selective neural electrical stimulation of radial and median nerves enables the activation of functional movements in the paralyzed hand of individuals with tetraplegia. Compared to previous approaches for which up to 12 muscles were targeted through individual muscular stimulations, we focused on minimizing the number of implanted electrodes however providing almost all the needed and useful hand movements for subjects with complete tetraplegia. METHODS:We performed acute experiments during scheduled surgeries of the upper limb with eligible subjects. We scanned a set of multicontact neural stimulation cuff electrode configurations, pre-computed through modeling simulations. We reported the obtained isolated and functional movements that were considered useful for the subject (different grasping movements). RESULTS:In eight subjects, we demonstrated that selective stimulation based on multicontact cuff electrodes and optimized current spreading over the active contacts provided isolated, compound, functional and strong movements; most importantly 3 out of 4 had isolated fingers or thumb flexion, one patient performed a Key Grip, another one the Power and Hook Grips, and the 2 last all the 3 Grips. Several configurations were needed to target different areas within the nerve to obtain all the envisioned movements. We further confirmed that the upper limb nerves have muscle specific fascicles, which makes it possible to activate isolated movements. CONCLUSIONS:The future goal is to provide patients with functional restoration of object grasping and releasing with a minimally invasive solution: only two cuff electrodes above the elbow. Ethics Committee / ANSM clearance prior to the beginning of the study (inclusion period 2016-2018): CPP Sud Méditerranée, #ID-RCB:2014-A01752-45, first acceptance 10th of February 2015, amended 12th of January 2016. TRIAL REGISTRATION:(www.clinicaltrials.gov): #NCT03721861, Retrospectively registered on 26th of October 2018.

SUBMITTER: Tigra W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7236876 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Selective neural electrical stimulation restores hand and forearm movements in individuals with complete tetraplegia.

Tigra Wafa W Dali Mélissa M William Lucie L Fattal Charles C Gélis Anthony A Divoux Jean-Louis JL Coulet Bertrand B Teissier Jacques J Guiraud David D Azevedo Coste Christine C

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 20200519 1

<h4>Background</h4>We hypothesized that a selective neural electrical stimulation of radial and median nerves enables the activation of functional movements in the paralyzed hand of individuals with tetraplegia. Compared to previous approaches for which up to 12 muscles were targeted through individual muscular stimulations, we focused on minimizing the number of implanted electrodes however providing almost all the needed and useful hand movements for subjects with complete tetraplegia.<h4>Meth ...[more]

PMID: 32429963

Similar Datasets

Project description:Epidural electrical stimulation can restore limb motor function after spinal cord injury by reactivating the surviving neural circuits. In previous epidural electrical stimulation studies, single electrode sites and continuous tetanic stimulation have often been used. With this stimulation, the body is prone to declines in tolerance and locomotion coordination. In the present study, rat models of complete spinal cord injury were established by vertically cutting the spinal cord at the T8 level to eliminate disturbance from residual nerve fibers, and were then subjected to epidural electrical stimulation. The flexible extradural electrode had good anatomical topology and matched the shape of the spinal canal of the implanted segment. Simultaneously, the electrode stimulation site was able to be accurately applied to the L2-3 and S1 segments of the spinal cord. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the implanted epidural electrical stimulation electrodes, GFAP/Iba-1 double-labeled immunofluorescence staining was performed on the spinal cord below the electrodes at 7 days after the electrode implantation. Immunofluorescence results revealed no significant differences in the numbers or morphologies of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord after electrode implantation, and there was no activated Iba-1+ cell aggregation, indicating that the implant did not cause an inflammatory response in the spinal cord. Rat gait analysis showed that, at 3 days after surgery, gait became coordinated in rats with spinal cord injury under burst stimulation. The regained locomotion could clearly distinguish the support phase and the swing phase and dynamically adjust with the frequency of stimulus distribution. To evaluate the matching degree between the flexible epidural electrode (including three stimulation contacts), vertebral morphology, and the level of the epidural site of the stimulation electrode, micro-CT was used to scan the thoracolumbar vertebrae of rats before and after electrode implantation. Based on the experimental results of gait recovery using three-site stimulation electrodes at L2-3 and S1 combined with burst stimulation in a rat model of spinal cord injury, epidural electrical stimulation is a promising protocol that needs to be further explored. This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (approval No. 2019-X15-39) on April 19, 2019.

Project description:It is still challenging to achieve a complex grasp or fine finger control by using surface functional electrical stimulation (FES), which usually requires a precise electrode configuration under laboratory or clinical settings. The goals of this study are as follows: 1) to study the possibility of selectively activating individual fingers; 2) to investigate whether the current activation threshold and selective range of individual fingers are affected by two factors: changes in the electrode position and forearm rotation (pronation, neutral and supination); and 3) to explore a theoretical model for guidance of the electrode placement used for selective activation of individual fingers. A coordinate system with more than 400 grid points was established over the forearm skin surface. A searching procedure was used to traverse all grid points to identify the stimulation points for finger extension/flexion by applying monophasic stimulation pulses. Some of the stimulation points for finger extension and flexion were selected and tested in their respective two different forearm postures according to the number and the type of the activated fingers and the strength of finger action response to the electrical stimulation at the stimulation point. The activation thresholds and current ranges of the selectively activated finger at each stimulation point were determined by visual analysis. The stimulation points were divided into three groups ("Low", "Medium" and "High") according to the thresholds of the 1st activated fingers. The angles produced by the selectively activated finger within selective current ranges were measured and analyzed. Selective stimulation of extension/flexion is possible for most fingers. Small changes in electrode position and forearm rotation have no significant effect on the threshold amplitude and the current range for the selective activation of most fingers (p > 0.05). The current range is the largest (more than 2 mA) for selective activation of the thumb, followed by those for the index, ring, middle and little fingers. The stimulation points in the "Low" group for all five fingers lead to noticeable finger angles at low current intensity, especially for the index, middle, and ring fingers. The slopes of the finger angle variation in the "Low" group for digits 2~4 are inversely proportional to the current intensity, whereas the slopes of the finger angle variation in other groups and in all groups for the thumb and little finger are proportional to the current intensity. It is possible to selectively activate the extension/flexion of most fingers by stimulating the forearm muscles. The physiological characteristics of each finger should be considered when placing the negative electrode for selective stimulation of individual fingers. The electrode placement used for the selective activation of individual fingers should not be confined to the location with the lowest activation threshold.

Dataset Information

Selective neural electrical stimulation restores hand and forearm movements in individuals with complete tetraplegia.

Publications

Selective neural electrical stimulation restores hand and forearm movements in individuals with complete tetraplegia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets