Dataset Information

Pancreatic Function in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Cohort Study Comparing 3 Methods of Detecting Fat Malabsorption and the Impact of Short-term Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Reliable pancreatic function tests in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) are needed. This cohort study identified malabsorption in people with CP compared with healthy people and then investigated short-term pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) and fat malabsorption, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS:Subjects with CP were evaluated before and after PERT and compared with the healthy cohort using coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), stool bomb calorimetry, and the malabsorption blood test (MBT). Anthropometrics, micronutrients, and QOL data were collected. Group means at baseline and after PERT were analyzed. RESULTS:The 24 subjects with CP had greater stool energy loss (5668 cal/g [standard deviation {SD}, 753] vs 5152 cal/g [SD, 418], P < 0.01), reduced triglyceride absorption (MBT, 8.3 mg·h/dL [SD, 4.3] vs 17.7 mg·h/dL [SD, 10.3], P < 0.001), lower fat intake, and poorer QOL. Differences in CFA were not significant (90.9% [SD, 12.8] vs 95.4% [SD, 9.3]). After PERT, triglyceride absorption (? = 1.7 [SD, 3], P < 0.05) and QOL increased. CONCLUSIONS:The MBT detected changes in triglyceride absorption in the absence of CFA changes. The MBT may be helpful in guiding PERT initiation in patients with CP before significant morbidity.

SUBMITTER: Brownell JN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7243202 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pancreatic Function in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Cohort Study Comparing 3 Methods of Detecting Fat Malabsorption and the Impact of Short-term Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy.

Brownell Jefferson N JN Schall Joan I JI Stallings Virginia A VA

Pancreas 20190901 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>Reliable pancreatic function tests in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) are needed. This cohort study identified malabsorption in people with CP compared with healthy people and then investigated short-term pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) and fat malabsorption, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL).<h4>Methods</h4>Subjects with CP were evaluated before and after PERT and compared with the healthy cohort using coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), stoo ...[more]

PMID: 31404029

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMost people with cystic fibrosis (CF) (80% to 90%) need pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to prevent malnutrition. Enzyme preparations need to be taken whenever food is taken, and the dose needs to be adjusted according to the food consumed. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of PERT is needed to guide clinical practice, as there is variability between centres with respect to assessment of pancreatic function, time of commencing treatment, dose and choice of supplements. This is an updated version of a published review.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of PERT in children and adults with CF and to compare the efficacy and safety of different formulations of PERT and their appropriateness in different age groups. Also, to compare the effects of PERT in CF according to different diagnostic subgroups (e.g. different ages at introduction of therapy and different categories of pancreatic function).Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Most recent search: 07 November 2019. We also searched an ongoing trials website and the websites of the pharmaceutical companies who manufacture pancreatic enzyme replacements for any additional trials. Most recent search: 26 December 2019.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in people of any age, with CF and receiving PERT, at any dosage and in any formulation, for a period of not less than four weeks, compared to placebo or other PERT preparations.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently assessed trials and extracted outcome data. They also assessed the risk of bias and quality of the evidence (GRADE) of the trials included in the review.Main results14 trials were included in the review (641 children and adults with CF), two of these were parallel trials and 12 were cross-over trials. Interventions included different enteric and non-enteric-coated preparations of varying formulations in comparison to each other. The number of participants in each trial varied between 14 and 129. 13 trials were for a duration of four weeks and one trial lasted seven weeks. The majority of the trials had an unclear risk of bias from the randomisation process as the details of this were not given; they also had a high risk of attrition bias and reporting bias. The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. We mostly could not combine data from the trials as they compared different formulations and the findings from individual trials provided insufficient evidence to determine the size and precision of the effects of different formulations.Authors' conclusionsThere is limited evidence of benefit from enteric-coated microspheres when compared to non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparations up to one month. In the only comparison where we could combine any data, the fact that these were cross-over trials is likely to underestimate the level of inconsistency between the results of the trials due to over-inflation of CIs from the individual trials.There is no evidence on the long-term effectiveness and risks associated with PERT. There is also no evidence on the relative dosages of enzymes needed for people with different levels of severity of pancreatic insufficiency, optimum time to start treatment and variations based on differences in meals and meal sizes. There is a need for a properly designed trial that can answer these questions.

Project description:PurposeThe necrosis-fibrosis hypothesis describes a continuum between single attacks of acute pancreatitis (SAP), recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) with endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. For prevention purposes we evaluated clinico-radiological parameters and pancreatic volumetry to compare SAP and RAP and provide prognostic relevance on short-term mortality, need for intervention and the hospitalization duration.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively investigated 225 consecutive patients (150 males, range 19-97years) with acute pancreatitis (74%SAP, 26%RAP) according to the revised Atlanta classification. All patients received an intravenous contrast-enhanced CT after a median time of 5 (IQR 5-7) days after onset of symptoms. Two experienced observers rated the severity of AP by 3 CT scores (CTSI, mCTSI, EPIC). Moreover, total pancreatic volumes and additional parenchymal necrosis volumes were assessed, when appropriate. Clinical parameters were etiology of AP, lipase on admission, CRP 48 hours after admission (CRP48), and the presence of organ dysfunction, assessed by the modified Marshall score. The modified Marshall score included systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, and the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) and was assessed on admission and 48 hours after admission to find patients with persistent organ failure. Outcome parameters were total hospitalization duration, short-term mortality and need for intervention.ResultsLipase, CRP48, etiology of AP, EPIC, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and the presence of a pleural effusion differed significantly in both groups (p<0.05). In 109 patients with interstitial edematous AP, the total pancreatic volume was significantly smaller in patients with RAP compared to those with SAP (69±35cm3; (RAP) vs 106±45cm3; (SAP), p<0.001). All outcome parameters including the mortality rates (SAP vs. RAP: 15% vs. 7%) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). In the necrotizing RAP group, only the necrotic volume correlated significantly with total hospitalization time (r = 0.72, p<0.001), whereas the systolic blood pressure was the only, but weak predictor for short-term mortality (β-coefficient: -0.05, p = 0.03) and the need for intervention (β-coefficient: -0.02, p = 0.048) in the total RAP group. In patients with SAP, the modified Marshall score was the strongest predictor of short-term mortality, followed by the mCTSI on multivariate logistic regression (Marshall score: β-coefficient: 1.79, p<0.001; mCTSI: β-coefficient: 0.40, p<0.001). CTSI was the best predictor for required intervention in necrotizing SAP (β-coefficient: 0.46, p<0.001), followed by the volume of intrapancreatic necrosis (β-coefficient: 0.17, p = 0.03).ConclusionTotal pancreatic volume differed significantly between interstitial RAP and SAP and intrapancreatic necrosis volume revealed prognostic value for the total hospitalization duration in necrotizing RAP. Although all outcome parameters were comparable between SAP and RAP, only systolic blood pressure and pancreatic volumetry were prognostic in RAP. In SAP, only the modified Marshall score and mCTSI revealed prognostic value for short-term mortality, whereas CTSI was predictive for the need for intervention.

Dataset Information

Pancreatic Function in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Cohort Study Comparing 3 Methods of Detecting Fat Malabsorption and the Impact of Short-term Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy.

Publications

Pancreatic Function in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Cohort Study Comparing 3 Methods of Detecting Fat Malabsorption and the Impact of Short-term Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets