Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly in the past decade, and new drug combinations have improved the response rates and prolonged survival. Studies comparing different induction chemotherapy regimens have shown that triple combinations have better results than double combinations. However, comparisons among different triple combinations are rare in the literature. METHODS:We retrospectively compared two triple combinations comprising bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) versus thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CTD), and aimed at identifying which of the two combinations would yield better response rates following four induction cycles prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with untreated multiple myeloma. RESULTS:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 311 patients from 24 different centers.The VCD regimen was used as induction therapy by 117 (37.6%) patients, whereas 194 (62.4%) patients received the CTD regimen. After four cycles of induction on an intention-to-treat basis, 54% of the patients in the VCD group achieved at least very good partial response versus 42.8% in the CTD group (p=0.05). We observed no difference in neuropathy or thrombotic events rates among the two regimens. CONCLUSION:Our results corroborate the superiority of the triple combination regimes containing bortezomib over the triple combination with thalidomide as pre ASCT induction therapy in MM.

SUBMITTER: Crusoe EQ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7248497 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr - Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation.

Crusoe Edvan De Queiroz EQ   Higashi Fabiana F   Martinez Gracia G   Bittencourt Rosane R   Pinto Neto Jorge Vaz JV   Sousa Lais L   Santucci Rodrigo R   Magalhães Roberto José Pessoa RJP   Colli Gilberto G   Nunes Renata Ferreira Marques RFM   Ribeiro Glaciano G   Nicacio Jandir J   Zanella Karla Richter KR   Kutner Jose Mauro JM   Magalhaes Andre A   Leao Danielle D   Hallack Neto Abrahão Elias AE   Braga Walter W   Souza Emanuella G EG   Guimaraes Antonio Julio A M AJAM   Durigon Giovanna Steffenello GS   Laks Dani D   Maiolino Angelo A   Hungria Vania Tietsche de Moraes VTM  

Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy 20190812 2


<h4>Background</h4>The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly in the past decade, and new drug combinations have improved the response rates and prolonged survival. Studies comparing different induction chemotherapy regimens have shown that triple combinations have better results than double combinations. However, comparisons among different triple combinations are rare in the literature.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively compared two triple combinations comprising bortezom  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10652744 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4521972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6593455 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7441167 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2957585 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4508238 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8018137 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3324254 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2745621 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5980148 | biostudies-literature