Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Testing validity of FitnessGram in two samples of US adolescents (12-15 years).


ABSTRACT: Background:This study examined the validity of the FitnessGram® criterion-reference cut-points for cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) based on two samples of US adolescents (aged 12-15 years). This study also established the CRF cut-points for metabolically healthy weight status based on a recent national fitness survey for the purposes of cross-validating with pre-existing cut-points including FitnessGram. Methods:Two cross-sectional data from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (n = 378) and 2012 NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey (NNYFS) (n = 451) were used. CRF (estimated V? O2max in mL/kg/min) was estimated from a submaximal exercise test. CRF categories based on FitnessGram cut-points, a clustered cardiometabolic risk factors score and weight status were used. A series of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to identify age- and sex-specific CRF cut-points that were optimal for metabolically healthy weight status. Results:Based on FitnessGram cut-points, having high risk CRF, but not low risk CRF, was associated with high cardiometabolic risk (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.14-8.79) and unhealthy weight status (OR = 5.81, 95% CI = 3.49-9.68). The optimal CRF cut-points for 12-13-year-olds and 14-15-year-olds were 40 and 43 mL/kg/min in males and 39 and 34 mL/kg/min in females, respectively. Compared to meeting new CRF cut-points, not meeting new CRF cut-points was associated with higher odds of showing high cardiometabolic risk (OR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.47-5.77) and metabolically unhealthy weight status (OR = 4.47, 95% CI = 2.83-7.05). Conclusion:FitnessGram CRF cut-point itself has rarely been scrutinized in previous literature. Our findings provide partial support for FitnessGram based on two samples of US adolescents. CRF cut-points established in this study supports international criterion-referenced cut-points as well as FitnessGram cut-points only for males. FitnessGram should be continuously monitored and scrutinized using different samples.

SUBMITTER: Lee EY 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7248668 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Testing validity of FitnessGram in two samples of US adolescents (12-15 years).

Lee Eun-Young EY   Barnes Joel D JD   Lang Justin J JJ   Silva Diego A S DAS   Tomkinson Grant R GR   Tremblay Mark S MS  

Journal of exercise science and fitness 20200510 3


<h4>Background</h4>This study examined the validity of the FitnessGram® criterion-reference cut-points for cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) based on two samples of US adolescents (aged 12-15 years). This study also established the CRF cut-points for metabolically healthy weight status based on a recent national fitness survey for the purposes of cross-validating with pre-existing cut-points including FitnessGram.<h4>Methods</h4>Two cross-sectional data from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutri  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8628133 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8473301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7480506 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7593363 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7719273 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7558942 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6855478 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8114737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7719269 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3016379 | biostudies-literature