Dataset Information

CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for potential resectable gastric cancer, but patients' responses vary. We aimed to develop and validate a radiomics score (rad_score) to predict treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to investigate its efficacy in survival stratification. METHODS:A total of 106 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before gastrectomy were included (training cohort: n?=?74; validation cohort: n?=?32). Radiomics features were extracted from the pre-treatment portal venous-phase CT. After feature reduction, a rad_score was established by Randomised Tree algorithm. A rad_clinical_score was constructed by integrating the rad_score with clinical variables, so was a clinical score by clinical variables only. The three scores were validated regarding their discrimination and clinical usefulness. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the score thresholds (updated with post-operative clinical variables), and their survivals were compared. RESULTS:In the validation cohort, the rad_score demonstrated a good predicting performance in treatment response to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (AUC [95% CI] =0.82 [0.67, 0.98]), which was better than the clinical score (based on pre-operative clinical variables) without significant difference (0.62 [0.42, 0.83], P?=?0.09). The rad_clinical_score could not further improve the performance of the rad_score (0.70 [0.51, 0.88], P?=?0.16). Based on the thresholds of these scores, the high-score groups all achieved better survivals than the low-score groups in the whole cohort (all P?

SUBMITTER: Sun KY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7249312 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Sun Kai-Yu KY Hu Hang-Tong HT Chen Shu-Ling SL Ye Jin-Ning JN Li Guang-Hua GH Chen Li-Da LD Peng Jian-Jun JJ Feng Shi-Ting ST Yuan Yu-Jie YJ Hou Xun X Wu Hui H Li Xin X Wu Ting-Fan TF Wang Wei W Xu Jian-Bo JB

BMC cancer 20200525 1

<h4>Background</h4>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for potential resectable gastric cancer, but patients' responses vary. We aimed to develop and validate a radiomics score (rad_score) to predict treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to investigate its efficacy in survival stratification.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 106 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before gastrectomy were included (training cohort: n = 74; validation cohort: n = 32). Radiomics featur ...[more]

PMID: 32450841

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo investigate whether intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics may predict pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy against advanced gastric cancer.MethodsClinical, pathological, and CT data from 231 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our hospital between July 2014 and February 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were randomly divided into a training group (n = 161) and a validation group (n = 70). The support vector machine classifier was used to establish radiomics models. A clinical model was established based on the selected clinical indicators. Finally, the radiomics and clinical models were combined to generate a radiomics-clinical model. ROC analyses were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency for each model. Calibration curves and decision curves were used to evaluate the optimal model.ResultsA total of 91 cases were recorded with good response and 140 with poor response. The radiomics model demonstrated that the AUC was higher in the combined model than in the intratumoral and peritumoral models (training group: 0.949, 0.943, and 0.846, respectively; validation group: 0.815, 0.778, and 0.701, respectively). Age, Borrmann classification, and Lauren classification were used to construct the clinical model. Among the radiomics-clinical models, the combined-clinical model showed the highest AUC (training group: 0.960; validation group: 0.843), which significantly improved prediction efficiency.ConclusionThe peritumoral model provided additional value in the evaluation of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy against advanced gastric cancer, and the combined-clinical model showed the highest predictive efficiency.Critical relevance statementIntratumoral and peritumoral radiomics can noninvasively predict the pathological response against advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to guide early treatment decision and provide individual treatment for patients.Key points1. Radiomics can predict pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy against advanced gastric cancer. 2. Peritumoral radiomics has additional predictive value. 3. Radiomics-clinical models can guide early treatment decisions and improve patient prognosis.

Project description:ImportanceNeoadjuvant therapies have been shown to decrease tumor burden, increase resection rate, and improve the outcomes among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, not all patients are equally responsive; therefore, differentiating potential respondents from nonrespondents is clinically important.ObjectiveTo use pretreatment computed tomography (CT)-pixelated feature-difference extraction techniques to identify diagnostically relevant features that could predict patients' response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at diagnosis.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter cohort study included patients with locally advanced GC who were treated from January 2010 to July 2017 at 2 hospitals in southern China (training cohort) and 1 hospital in northern China (external validation cohort). Their clinicopathological data, pretreatment CT images, and pathological reports were retrieved and analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from December 2017 to May 2021.ExposuresAll patients underwent 2 to 4 cycles of fluorouracil in combination with a platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. All gastrectomies were performed according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (14th edition) guidelines.Main outcomes and measuresReliability of clinicopathological and radiomics-based features were assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsA total of 323 patients (242 [74.9%] men; median [range] age, 58 [24-82] years) were included in the study, with 250 patients (77.4%) in the training cohort and 73 (22.6%) in the validation cohort. The baseline pretreatment characteristics of the training and validation cohorts were well-balanced. The number of respondents in the training and validation cohort was 122 (48.8%) and 40 (54.8%), respectively, and the number of nonrespondents was 128 (51.2%) and 33 (45.2%), respectively. No clinicopathological variables were significantly associated with treatment response. Using radiomics, 20 low-intercorrelated features from a total of 7477 features were used to construct a radiomics signature that demonstrated significant association with treatment response. Good discrimination performance of the radiomics signature for predicting treatment response in the training (AUC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.675-0.798) and external validation (AUC, 0.679; 95% CI, 0.554-0.803) cohorts was observed. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the radiomics signature.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, the proposed radiomics signature showed potential as a clinical aid for predicting the response of patients with locally advanced GC before treatment, thereby allowing timely planning for effective treatments for potential nonrespondents.

Project description:ObjectivesTo develop and evaluate machine learning models using baseline and restaging computed tomography (CT) for predicting and early detecting pathological downstaging (pDS) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).MethodsWe collected 292 AGC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. They were classified into (a) primary cohort (206 patients with 3-4 cycles chemotherapy) for model development and internal validation, (b) testing cohort I (46 patients with 3-4 cycles chemotherapy) for evaluating models' predictive ability before and after the complete course, and (c) testing cohort II (n = 40) for model evaluation on its performance at early treatment. We extracted 1,231 radiomics features from venous phase CT at baseline and restaging. We selected radiomics models based on 28 cross-combination models and measured the areas under the curve (AUC). Our prediction radiomics (PR) model is designed to predict pDS outcomes using baseline CT. Detection radiomics (DR) model is applied to restaging CT for early pDS detection.ResultsPR model achieved promising outcomes in two testing cohorts (AUC 0.750, p = .009 and AUC 0.889, p = .000). DR model also showed a good predictive ability (AUC 0.922, p = .000 and AUC 0.850, p = .000), outperforming the commonly used RECIST method (NRI 39.5% and NRI 35.4%). Furthermore, the improved DR model with averaging outcome scores of PR and DR models showed boosted results in two testing cohorts (AUC 0.961, p = .000 and AUC 0.921, p = .000).ConclusionsCT-based radiomics models perform well on prediction and early detection tasks of pDS and can potentially assist surgical decision-making in AGC patients.Key points• Baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-based radiomics features were predictive of pathological downstaging, allowing accurate identification of non-responders before therapy. • Restaging CECT-based radiomics features were predictive to achieve pDS after and even at an early stage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. • Combination of baseline and restaging CECT-based radiomics features was promising for early detection and preoperative evaluation of pathological downstaging of AGC.

Project description:BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) models, clinical models (CM), and the integrated model (IM) are utilized to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.ObjectiveThe objective is to identify the diagnostic test of the AI model and to compare the accuracy of AI, CM, and IM through a comprehensive summary of head-to-head comparative studies.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched until September 5, 2023, to compile English language studies without regional restrictions. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Forest plots were utilized to illustrate the findings of diagnostic accuracy, while Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated to estimate sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Meta-regression was applied to analyze heterogeneity across the studies. To assess the presence of publication bias, Deeks' funnel plot and an asymmetry test were employed.ResultsA total of 9 studies, comprising 3313 patients, were included for the AI model, with 7 head-to-head comparative studies involving 2699 patients. Across the 9 studies, the pooled SEN for the AI model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.82), and SPE was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84). Meta-regression was conducted, revealing that the cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and gold standard might be sources of heterogeneity. In the head-to-head comparative studies, the pooled SEN for AI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) with SPE at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85). For CM, the pooled SEN was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77) with SPE at 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.64), while for IM, the pooled SEN was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86) with SPE at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.79). Notably, there was no statistical difference, except that IM exhibited higher SEN than AI, while maintaining a similar level of SPE in pairwise comparisons. In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis subgroup, the CT-based Deep Learning (DL) subgroup, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline subgroup, the AI model exhibited higher SEN but lower SPE compared to the IM. Conversely, in the training cohort subgroup and the internal validation cohort subgroup, the AI model demonstrated lower SEN but higher SPE than the IM. The subgroup analysis underscored that factors such as the number of cohorts, cohort type, cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and choice of gold standard could impact the reliability and robustness of the results.ConclusionAI has demonstrated its viability as a tool for predicting the response of GC patients to NACT Furthermore, CT-based DL model in AI was sensitive to extract tumor features and predict the response. The results of subgroup analysis also supported the above conclusions. Large-scale rigorously designed diagnostic accuracy studies and head-to-head comparative studies are anticipated.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, CRD42022377030.

Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in individual patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is essential for personalized medicine. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) based on pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images and clinical features to predict the response to NACT in patients with LAGC.Methods719 patients with LAGC were retrospectively recruited from four Chinese hospitals between Dec 1st, 2014 and Nov 30th, 2020. The training cohort and internal validation cohort (IVC), comprising 243 and 103 patients, respectively, were randomly selected from center I; the external validation cohort1 (EVC1) comprised 207 patients from center II; and EVC2 comprised 166 patients from another two hospitals. Two imaging signatures, reflecting the phenotypes of the deep learning and handcrafted radiomics features, were constructed from the pretreatment portal venous-phase CT images. A four-step procedure, including reproducibility evaluation, the univariable analysis, the LASSO method, and the multivariable logistic regression analysis, was applied for feature selection and signature building. The integrated DLRN was then developed for the added value of the imaging signatures to independent clinicopathological factors for predicting the response to NACT. The prediction performance was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on the DLRN were used to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) in the follow-up cohort (n = 300).FindingsThe DLRN showed satisfactory discrimination of good response to NACT and yielded the areas under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) of 0.829 (95% CI, 0.739-0.920), 0.804 (95% CI, 0.732-0.877), and 0.827 (95% CI, 0.755-0.900) in the internal and two external validation cohorts, respectively, with good calibration in all cohorts (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the DLRN performed significantly better than the clinical model (p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis confirmed that the DLRN was clinically useful. Besides, DLRN was significantly associated with the DFS of patients with LAGC (p < 0.05).InterpretationA deep learning-based radiomics nomogram exhibited a promising performance for predicting therapeutic response and clinical outcomes in patients with LAGC, which could provide valuable information for individualized treatment.

Dataset Information

CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Publications

CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets