Dataset Information

Description of COVID-19 in HIV-infected individuals: a single-centre, prospective cohort.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Information about incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of HIV-infected individuals with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is scarce. We characterised individuals with COVID-19 among a cohort of HIV-infected adults in Madrid. METHODS:In this observational prospective study, we included all consecutive HIV-infected individuals (aged ?18 years) who had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 as of April 30, 2020, at the Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (Madrid, Spain). We compared the characteristics of HIV-infected individuals with COVID-19 with a sample of HIV-infected individuals assessed before the COVID-19 pandemic, and described the outcomes of individuals with COVID-19. FINDINGS:51 HIV-infected individuals were diagnosed with COVID-19 (incidence 1·8%, 95% CI 1·3-2·3). Mean age of patients was 53·3 years (SD 9·5); eight (16%) were women, and 43 (84%) men. 35 (69%) cases of co-infection had laboratory confirmed COVID-19, and 28 (55%) required hospital admission. Age and CD4 cell counts in 51 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were similar to those in 1288 HIV-infected individuals without; however, 32 (63%) with COVID-19 had at least one comorbidity (mostly hypertension and diabetes) compared with 495 (38%) without COVID-19 (p=0·00059). 37 (73%) patients had received tenofovir before COVID-19 diagnosis compared with 487 (38%) of those without COVID-19 (p=0·0036); 11 (22%) in the COVID-19 group had previous protease inhibitor use (mostly darunavir) compared with 175 (14%; p=0·578). Clinical, analytical, and radiological presentation of COVID-19 in HIV-infected individuals was similar to that described in the general population. Six (12%) individuals were critically ill, two of whom had CD4 counts of less than 200 cells per ?L, and two (4%) died. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR remained positive after a median of 40 days from symptoms onset in six (32%) individuals, four of whom had severe disease or low nadir CD4 cell counts. INTERPRETATION:HIV-infected individuals should not be considered to be protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection or to have lower risk of severe disease. Generally, they should receive the same treatment approach applied to the general population. FUNDING:None.

SUBMITTER: Vizcarra P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7255735 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Description of COVID-19 in HIV-infected individuals: a single-centre, prospective cohort.

Vizcarra Pilar P Pérez-Elías María J MJ Quereda Carmen C Moreno Ana A Vivancos María J MJ Dronda Fernando F Casado José L JL

The lancet. HIV 20200528 8

<h4>Background</h4>Information about incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of HIV-infected individuals with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is scarce. We characterised individuals with COVID-19 among a cohort of HIV-infected adults in Madrid.<h4>Methods</h4>In this observational prospective study, we included all consecutive HIV-infected individuals (aged ≥18 years) who had suspected or confirmed COVID-19 as of April 30, 2020, at the Hospital Un ...[more]

PMID: 32473657

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVaccines against COVID-19 are a powerful tool to control the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A thorough description of their immunogenicity among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) is necessary. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 vaccine among PLWHIV.MethodsIn this prospective cohort, adult PLWHIV outpatients were enrolled during the Italian vaccination campaign. Enrolment was allowed irrespective of ongoing combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), plasma HIV viral load and CD4+ T cell count. A two-dose regimen of mRNA-1273, with administrations performed 28 days apart, was employed. The primary outcomes were anti-spike (anti-S) antibody titres and neutralising antibody activity, assessed 28 days after completing the vaccination schedule. A convenient sample of individuals not affected by HIV was also collected to serve as control (referred as healthy-donors, HDs).FindingsWe enrolled 71 PLWHIV, mostly male (84·5%), with a mean age of 47 years, a median CD4+ T cell count of 747·0 cells per µL and a median HIV viral load <50 copies/mL. COVID-19-experienced PLWHIV displayed higher anti-S antibody titres (p=0·0007) and neutralising antibody activity in sera (p=0·0007) than COVID-19-naïve PLWHIV. When stratified according to CD4+ T cell count (<350 cells/μL, 350-500 cells/μL, >500 cells/μL), anti-S antibody titres (6/71, median 2173 U/mL [IQR 987-4109]; 7/71, 5763 IU/mL [IQR 4801->12500]; 58/71, 2449 U/mL [IQR 1524-5704]) were not lower to those observed among HDs (10, median 1425 U/mL [IQR 599-6131]). In addition, neutralising antibody activity, stratified according to the CD4+ T cell count (6/71, median 1314 [IQR 606-2477]; 7/71, 3329 IU/mL [IQR 1905-10508]; 58/71, 1227 U/mL [IQR 761-3032]), was like those displayed by HDs (10, median 2112 U/mL [IQR 719-8889]).InterpretationIn our cohort of PLWHIV with well-controlled ART, stable viral suppression and robust CD4+ T cell count, inoculation with mRNA-1273 vaccine given 4 weeks apart produced detectable humoral immune response, similar to individuals without HIV infection, supporting vaccination in PLWHIV.FundingThis study was partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente 2021, by Intesa San Paolo COVID-19 emergency 2020 funds, and by Fondazione Cariplo Grant (INNATE-CoV).

Project description:BackgroundMortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation is high. We aimed to examine whether mavrilimumab, an anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-α monoclonal antibody, added to standard management, improves clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.MethodsThis single-centre prospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, hypoxia, and systemic hyperinflammation. Patients received a single intravenous dose (6 mg/kg) of mavrilimumab added to standard care given by the hospital at the time. The control group consisted of contemporaneous patients with similar baseline characteristics who received standard care at the same hospital. The main outcome was time to clinical improvement (defined as improvement of two or more points on the seven-point ordinal scale of clinical status). Other outcomes included proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement, survival, mechanical ventilation-free survival, and time to fever resolution. Adverse events were monitored daily.FindingsBetween March 17 and April 15, 2020, 13 non-mechanically ventilated patients (median age 57 years [IQR 52-58], 12 [92%] men) received mavrilimumab and 26 patients (median age 60 [IQR 53-67], 17 [65%] men) in the control group received standard care. During the 28-day follow-up, no patients in the mavrilimumab group died, and seven (27%) patients in the control group died (p=0·086). At day 28, all patients in the mavrilimumab group and 17 (65%) patients in the control group showed clinical improvement (p=0·030), with earlier improvement in the mavrilimumab than in the control group (mean time to improvement 8 days [IQR 5 to 11] vs 19 days [11 to >28], p=0·0001). By day 28, one (8%) patient in the mavrilimumab group progressed to mechanical ventilation compared with nine (35%) patients in the control group who progressed to mechanical ventilation or died (p=0·14). By day 14, fever resolved in ten (91%) of 11 febrile patients in the mavrilimumab group, compared with 11 (61%) of 18 febrile patients in the control group (p=0·18); fever resolution was faster in mavrilimumab recipients versus controls (median time to resolution 1 day [IQR 1 to 2] vs 7 days [3 to >14], p=0·0093). Mavrilimumab was well tolerated, with no infusion reactions. Three (12%) patients in the control group developed infectious complications.InterpretationMavrilimumab treatment was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with standard care in non-mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation. Treatment was well tolerated. Confirmation of efficacy requires controlled testing.FundingIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute.

Project description:ObjectiveAmong persons with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we compared postvaccine antibody responses and IMID disease activity/states.DesignSingle-centre prospective cohort study.SettingSpecialty ambulatory clinics in central Canada.ParticipantsPeople with inflammatory arthritis (n=78; 77% rheumatoid arthritis), systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (n=84; 57% lupus), inflammatory bowel disease (n=93; 43% Crohn's) and multiple sclerosis (n=72; 71% relapsing-remitting) (female 79.4%, white 84.7%, mean (SD) age 56.0 (14.3) years) received COVID-19 vaccinations between March 2021 and September 2022.Primary outcomePostvaccination anti-spike, anti-receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid (anti-NC) IgG antibodies tested by multiplex immunoassays compared across vaccine regimens and with responses in 370 age-matched and sex-matched vaccinated controls.Secondary outcomesCOVID-19 infection and self-reported IMID disease activity/state.ResultsMost (216/327, 66.1%) received homologous messenger RNA (mRNA) (BNT162b2 or mRNA1273) vaccines, 2.4% received homologous ChAdOx1 and 30.6% received heterologous vaccines (23.9% ChAdOx1/mRNA, 6.4% heterologous mRNA) for their first two vaccines (V1, V2). Seroconversion rates were 52.0% (91/175) for post-V1 anti-spike and 58.9% (103/175) for anti-RBD; 91.5% (214/234) for post-V2 anti-spike and 90.2% (211/234) for anti-RBD; and were lower than controls (post-V2 anti-spike 98.1% (360/370), p<0.0001). Antibody titres decreased 3 months after V2 but increased 1 month after the third vaccine (V3) and 1 month after the fourth vaccine (V4) (BAU/mL median (IQR), anti-spike 1835 (2448) 1 month post-V2, 629.1 (883.4) 3 months post-V2, 4757.5 (7033.1) 1 month post-V3 and 4356.0 (9393.4) 1 month post-V4; anti-RBD 1686.8 (2199.44) 1 month post-V2, 555.8 (809.3) 3 months post-V2, 4280.3 (6380.6) 1 month post-V3 and 4792.2 (11 673.78) 1 month post-V4). If primed with a vector vaccine, an mRNA vaccine increased antibody titres to those comparable to homologous mRNA vaccines. Anti-RBD and anti-spike titres were higher in anti-NC seropositive (n=31; 25 participants) versus seronegative samples (BAU/mL median (IQR) anti-RBD 11 755.3 (20 373.1) vs 1248.0 (53 278.7); anti-spike 11 254.4 (15 352.6) vs 1313.1 (3106.6); both p<0.001). IMID disease activity/state and rates of self-reported moderate or severe IMID flare were similar across vaccinations.ConclusionHeterologous COVID-19 vaccination improves seroconversion rates following a vector vaccine and does not lead to IMID disease flare. IMIDs benefit from at least three vaccines.

Dataset Information

Description of COVID-19 in HIV-infected individuals: a single-centre, prospective cohort.

Publications

Description of COVID-19 in HIV-infected individuals: a single-centre, prospective cohort.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets