Dataset Information

Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Study.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Single-agent PD-1 blockade exhibits limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We evaluated ipilimumab plus nivolumab compared with nivolumab alone in women with persistent or recurrent EOC.

Methods

Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, 1-3 prior regimens, and platinum-free interval (PFI) < 12 months. Participants were randomly allocated to intravenous nivolumab (every 2 weeks) or induction with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 doses (every 3 weeks), followed by every-2-week maintenance nivolumab for a maximum of 42 doses. The primary null hypothesis was equal probability of objective response within 6 months of random allocation in each arm.

Results

One hundred patients were allocated to receive either nivolumab (n = 49), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 51), with PFI of < 6 months in 62%. Six (12.2%) responses occurred within 6 months in the nivolumab group and 16 (31.4%) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (odds ratio, 3.28; 85% CI, 1.54 to infinity; P = .034). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 and 3.9 months in the nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab groups, respectively, with a PFI-stratified hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82); the respective hazard ratio for death was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.42). Grade ≥ 3 related adverse events occurred in 33% of patients in the nivolumab group and 49% in the combination group, with no treatment-related deaths. PD-L1 expression was not significantly associated with response in either treatment group.

Conclusion

Compared with nivolumab alone, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in EOC resulted in superior response rate and longer, albeit limited, PFS, with toxicity of the combination regimen comparable to prior reports. Additional combination studies to enhance durability of the dual regimen are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Zamarin D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7255977 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposePatients with persistent/recurrent cervical cancer following platinum-based chemotherapy have limited therapeutic options. The Gynecologic-Oncology-Group conducted a phase II trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in persistent/recurrent cervical carcinoma.Patients and methodsKey eligibility criteria included persistent/recurrent cervical cancer, failure of prior systemic therapy and ECOG PS 0-1. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given IV every 2 wk. until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 wk. for 6 months and every 12 wk. thereafter. The primary endpoints were objective response as assessed by RECIST 1.1. The study used a 2-stage group sequential design. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in tumor specimens by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a combined-positive-score (CPS) cutoff of ≥1%.ResultsOf 26 enrolled patients with persistent/recurrent cervical cancer, 25 were evaluable for response/toxicity with a median age of 45. 36% had ECOG PS of 1, and 100% had received one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen. PD-L1 expression (≥1%) was identified in 77.3% of tumor samples. As of 03/05/19, all patients were off study treatment; median follow-up for survival status was 32 months (range, 2-41.5). There were 21 (84%) patients with a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) and most were grades 1-2. Six (24%) patients had grade 3 TRAEs with 1 discontinuing nivolumab due to hepatic toxicity. No grade 5 TRAEs occurred, and 2 patients had grade 4 TRAEs. One confirmed partial response (4%; 90% CI, 0.4%-22.9%), duration of response 3.8 months. Thirty-six percent of patients had stable disease (SD) (9/25; 90% CI, 20.2%-54.4%); the median duration of SD was 5.7 months (range, 3.5-12.7). Estimated PFS and OS at 6 months were 16% and 78.4%, respectively.ConclusionSingle agent nivolumab exhibited low antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with persistent/recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Project description:PurposeThe vascular disrupting agent fosbretabulin tromethamine selectively targets pre-existing tumor vasculature, which causes vascular shutdown and leads to cancer cell death and necrosis. Antiangiogenesis agents such as bevacizumab, a humanized antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, might prevent revascularization during and after treatment with a vascular disrupting agent.Patients and methodsPatients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma, measurable or detectable disease, and three or fewer prior regimens were randomly assigned to bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks) or the combination of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) plus fosbretabulin (60 mg/m(2)) intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or toxicity. Randomization was stratified by disease status (measurable v nonmeasurable), prior bevacizumab, and platinum-free interval. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was designed with 80% power for a one-sided alternative at a 10% level of significance to detect a reduction in the hazard by 37.5%.ResultsThe study enrolled 107 patients. Median PFS was 4.8 months for bevacizumab and 7.3 months for bevacizumab plus fosbretabulin (hazard ratio, 0.69; 90% two-sided CI, 0.47 to 1.00; one-sided P = .05). The proportion responding (overall response rate) to bevacizumab was 28.2% among 39 patients with measurable disease and 35.7% among 42 patients treated with the combination. The relative probability of responding was 1.27 (90% CI, 0.74 to 2.17; one-sided P = .24). Adverse events greater than grade 3 were more common in the combination regimen than in bevacizumab only for hypertension (35% v 20%). There was one grade 3 thromboembolic event in the combination arm and one intestinal fistula in the bevacizumab only arm.ConclusionOn the basis of the PFS, overall response rate, and tolerability of these two antivascular therapies, further evaluation is warranted for this chemotherapy-free regimen. Fosbretabulin in combination with bevacizumab increases the risk of hypertension.