Dataset Information

Effectiveness of Adenotonsillectomy vs Watchful Waiting in Young Children With Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) is one of the most common surgical procedures to treat children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but to our knowledge there are no randomized clinical trials confirming the benefit of surgery compared with watchful waiting in children between 2 and 4 years of age.

Objective

To determine whether ATE is more effective than watchful waiting for treating otherwise healthy children with mild to moderate OSA.

Design, setting, and participants

This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2014 to December 2017 at the Otorhinolaryngology Department of the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. A total of 60 children, 2 to 4 years of age, with an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) score of 2 or greater and less than 10, were randomized to ATE (n = 29) or watchful waiting (n = 31). A total of 53 participants (88%; ATE, n = 25; watchful waiting, n = 28) completed the study. Data were analyzed from August 2018 to December 2018.

Interventions

Adenotonsillectomy.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in mean OAHI score change. Secondary outcomes were other polysomnography parameters, score on the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) questionnaire, and subgroup analyses. Polysomnography and the OSA-18 questionnaire were completed at baseline and after 6 months.

Results

Of the 60 included children, 34 (57%) were boys and the mean (SD) age at first polysomnography was 38 (9) months. Both groups had a decrease in mean OAHI score, and the difference in mean OAHI score change between the groups was small (-1.0; 95% CI, -2.4 to 0.5), in favor of ATE. However, there were large differences between the groups in favor of ATE regarding the OSA-18 questionnaire (eg, total OSA-18 score: -17; 95% CI, -24 to -10). Also, a subgroup analysis of 24 children with moderate OSA (OAHI ≥5 and <10) showed a meaningful difference in mean OAHI score change between the groups in favor of ATE (-3.1; 95% CI, -5.7 to -0.5). Of 28 children, 10 (36%) in the watchful waiting group received ATE after the follow-up, and 7 of these had moderate OSA at baseline.

Conclusions and relevance

This randomized clinical trial found only small differences between the groups regarding changes in OAHI, but further studies are needed. However, there were large improvements in quality of life after ATE. These results suggest that otherwise healthy children with mild OSA and mild effect on quality of life may benefit from watchful waiting, while children with moderate OSA should be considered for ATE.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02315911.

SUBMITTER: Fehrm J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7256861 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) is the primary surgical method for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. However, children with severe OSA have an increased risk for residual OSA after ATE. Previous studies indicate that adenopharyngoplasty (APP), a modified ATE with closure of the tonsillar pillars, might improve the surgical outcome, but the overall evidence is weak. Objective:To determine whether APP is more effective than ATE for treating severe OSA in otherwise healthy children. Design, Setting, and Participants:A blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at the otorhinolaryngology department at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Eighty-three children, aged 2 to 4 years, with an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) score of 10 or higher, were randomized to APP (n = 36) or ATE (n = 47). Participants were recruited from December 1, 2014, through November 31, 2016. Interventions:Adenotonsillectomy was performed in all 83 patients in both groups by the cold steel technique. The APP group also underwent closure of the tonsillar pillars with 2 inverted sutures on each side. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in OAHI score change before and after surgery. A higher score indicates worse problems and a score of 10 or higher is defined as severe OSA. The outcome was evaluated per protocol and with intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were other polysomnography variables and the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) questionnaire (possible total symptom score range, 18-126; higher scores indicate worse quality of life). Polysomnography was performed and the OSA-18 questionnaire was completed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results:A total of 83 children (49 [59%] boys; mean [SD] age, 36.6 [9.2] months) were included in the study. Of these, 74 (89%) (APP, n = 30; ATE, n = 44) completed the study. The mean (SD) preoperative OAHI score was 23.8 (11.8) for APP and 23.8 (11.5) for ATE. Both the APP and ATE groups had a significant decrease in mean OAHI score after surgery (-21.7; 95% CI, -26.3 to -17.2; and -21.1; 95% CI, -24.5 to -17.7, respectively), but there was no significant difference between the groups (0.7; 95% CI, -4.8 to 6.1). Furthermore, no significant differences between the groups were seen regarding other polysomnography variables (eg, respiratory distress index: mean, 0.6; 95% CI, -5.0 to 6.3) or the OSA-18 questionnaire (eg, total symptom score: -0.5; 95% CI, -13 to 12). One patient from each group was readmitted owing to postoperative bleeding, but no other complications were seen. Conclusions and Relevance:This trial did not show that APP was more effective than ATE alone to treat otherwise healthy children with severe OSA. This finding suggests that ATE should continue to be the primary treatment for OSA in children. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02315911.

Project description:Background and objectivesData from a randomized, controlled study of adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were used to test the hypothesis that children undergoing surgery had greater quality of life (QoL) and symptom improvement than control subjects. The objectives were to compare changes in validated QoL and symptom measurements among children randomized to undergo adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting; to determine whether race, weight, or baseline OSAS severity influenced changes in QoL and symptoms; and to evaluate associations between changes in QoL or symptoms and OSAS severity.MethodsChildren aged 5 to 9.9 years with OSAS (N = 453) were randomly assigned to undergo adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting with supportive care. Polysomnography, the Pediatric Quality of Life inventory, the Sleep-Related Breathing Scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, the 18-item Obstructive Sleep Apnea QoL instrument, and the modified Epworth Sleepiness Scale were completed at baseline and 7 months. Changes in the QoL and symptom surveys were compared between arms. Effect modification according to race and obesity and associations between changes in polysomnographic measures and QoL or symptoms were examined.ResultsGreater improvements in most QoL and symptom severity measurements were observed in children randomized to undergo adenotonsillectomy, including the parent-completed Pediatric Quality of Life inventory (effect size [ES]: 0.37), the 18-item Obstructive Sleep Apnea QoL instrument (ES: -0.93), the modified Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (ES: -0.42), and the Sleep-Related Breathing Scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (ES: -1.35). Effect modification was not observed by obesity or baseline severity but was noted for race in some symptom measures. Improvements in OSAS severity explained only a small portion of the observed changes.ConclusionsAdenotonsillectomy compared with watchful waiting resulted in significantly more improvements in parent-rated generic and OSAS-specific QoL measures and OSAS symptoms.