Dataset Information

Endoscopic thyroid lobectomy vs Conventional open thyroid lobectomy.

ABSTRACT: Background and Objective:Surgical managements for these suspicious nontoxic swellings requires open conventional method of thyroidectomy by neck incisions that can result in prominent scars and immediate risk usually hemorrhage. However new technological innovations came into practiced that include video assisted minimal invasive endoscopy by axillo-breast approach that gives very promising results with excellent cosmesis. In this study, we compared conventional open surgery with minimal invasive endoscopic techniques and associate various complaints and complications that were encountered in surgery. Methods:Sixty patients were enrolled in this comparative study. It was conducted from period February 2018 to February 2019. The patients were randomized alternatively in two groups. Group-I patients underwent conventional lobectomy while Group-II patients were operated endoscopically, Patients having nodules less than 3cm and Thy 1 and 2 were included in this study. Patient having nodules greater than 3cm, Multinodular goiter, recurrent nodule and Thy 3-6 were excluded from the study. Results:Patients who underwent endoscopic lobectomy were much more satisfied about scar marks whereas some developed post-operative complications. It included hoarseness of voice in Three (13.62%) patients, two patients developed seroma (9.08%), three patients (13.62%) erythema, whereas no postoperative complications were seen in patients who underwent open thyroid lobectomy. No signs of hypocalcemia noted in both approaches. Conclusions:The complications with endoscopic approaches are higher but they are minor and resolved spontaneously within maximum period of six weeks. However scar mark satisfaction was much higher in endoscopic lobectomy group.

SUBMITTER: Imran M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7260891 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Endoscopic thyroid lobectomy vs Conventional open thyroid lobectomy.

Imran Mariam M Mehmood Zahid Z Baloch Muhammad Naseem MN Altaf Sehrish S

Pakistan journal of medical sciences 20200501 4

<h4>Background and objective</h4>Surgical managements for these suspicious nontoxic swellings requires open conventional method of thyroidectomy by neck incisions that can result in prominent scars and immediate risk usually hemorrhage. However new technological innovations came into practiced that include video assisted minimal invasive endoscopy by axillo-breast approach that gives very promising results with excellent cosmesis. In this study, we compared conventional open surgery with minimal ...[more]

PMID: 32494283

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide and surgery remains the main treatment for early stage disease. Prior to the introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), lung resection for cancer was undertaken through an open thoracotomy. To date, the evidence base supporting the different surgical approaches is based on non-randomised studies, small randomised trials and is focused mainly on short-term in-hospital outcomes.Methods and analysisThe VIdeo assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus conventional Open LobEcTomy for lung cancer study is a UK multicentre parallel group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with blinding of outcome assessors and participants (to hospital discharge) comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of VATS lobectomy versus open lobectomy for treatment of lung cancer. We will test the hypothesis that VATS lobectomy is superior to open lobectomy with respect to self-reported physical function 5?weeks after randomisation (approximately 1?month after surgery). Secondary outcomes include assessment of efficacy (hospital stay, pain, proportion and time to uptake of chemotherapy), measures of safety (adverse health events), oncological outcomes (proportion of patients upstaged to pathologic N2 (pN2) disease and disease-free survival), overall survival and health related quality of life to 1?year. The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the UK (Dulwich) National Research Ethics Service Committee London. Findings will be written-up as methodology papers for conference presentation, and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Many aspects of the feasibility work will inform surgical RCTs in general and these will be reported at methodology meetings. We will also link with lung cancer clinical studies groups. The patient and public involvement group that works with the Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Brompton Hospital will help identify how we can best publicise the findings.Trial registration numberISRCTN13472721.

Project description:Importance:Vessel-sealant devices (VSDs) have been popularized for use in thyroid operations; however, the association of their use with postoperative neck hematoma, a rare but potentially fatal complication, has not been well studied. Objective:To examine the association of VSDs vs conventional hemostasis (CH) in thyroid operations with the development of neck hematoma. Design, Setting, and Participants:This retrospective cohort study evaluated 10?903 patients in the Thyroid Procedure-Targeted Database of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for differences in baseline covariates, including demographics, comorbidities, indications for thyroid procedure (goiter, Graves disease, malignant and benign thyroid nodule), and several other thyroid-specific characteristics, between the VSD and CH groups. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was postoperative hematoma requiring intervention with open evacuation, return to the operating room, tracheostomy, additional observation, or extended length of stay. Secondary outcomes include recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, operative duration, and hospital length of stay. Results:One-to-one propensity score matching yielded 6522 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [15] years; 8544 [78.4%] female) with 3261 in each exposure group such that distribution of observed baseline covariates was not different between groups of the same propensity score. Within the matched cohort, CH was associated with higher odds of neck hematoma compared with VSD (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.55-3.49; P?<?.001), with 34 (1.0%) hematomas in the VSD group and 78 (2.4%) in the CH group. On the basis of this analysis, the number needed to treat with a VSD to prevent 1 postoperative hematoma was 74. Secondary outcomes included longer length of hospital stay (incidence rate ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.36; P?<?.001]) in the CH group compared with the VSD group but no difference in the odds of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11; P?=?.32) or operative duration (incidence rate ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01; P?=?.24). Conclusions and Relevance:Use of VSDs during thyroid operations was associated with reduced odds of neck hematoma compared with CH techniques without increasing odds of nerve injury. The results suggest that postoperative neck hematoma rates after thyroid surgery may differ based on the hemostasis technique and that these differences should be considered when developing strategies for quality improvement of postoperative outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundIt is difficult to reliably distinguish between American Thyroid Association (ATA) low-risk and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) before surgery. Therefore, physicians are faced with a dilemma regarding the necessity and timing of completion total thyroidectomy (CT) after thyroid lobectomy (TL). We evaluated proper surgical methods by analyzing oncologic outcomes of TL in patients with DTC whose risk had been upgraded after surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,702 patients with DTC who underwent TL and ipsilateral central lymph node (LN) dissection between January 2006 and December 2011. The patients were classified into Group A (n=1,159; low risk; ≤5 central LN metastases or the absence of pathologic microscopic capsular invasion) and Group B (n=543; upgraded intermediate risk after surgery; >5 central LN metastases or the presence of pathologic microscopic capsular invasion). We analyzed their clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence-free survival.ResultsAll 32 patients who experienced recurrence underwent CT. After the first operation, the duration until reoperation in Groups A and B were 8.00±2.74 (range, 3.42-12.17) and 5.10±3.09 (range, 1.25-11.67) years, respectively. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates, disease-related mortality rates, or 10-year recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups. The mean follow-up durations in Groups A and B were 10.22±1.58 and 10.13±1.47 years, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that sex, age, tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), and number of central LN metastases were not associated with recurrence after TL, although the rate of central LN metastases was. Multivariate analysis showed that sex, age, tumor size, multifocality, ETE, central LN metastases, and the number of central LN metastases were not associated with recurrence after TL, although multifocality was.ConclusionsTL with prophylactic central compartment neck dissection (CCND) is sufficient for patients with DTC whose risk is upgraded after surgery because they have a good prognosis at long-term follow-up. Larger-scale randomized clinical trials are required to confirm our findings.

Project description:Background:Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) is regarded as a viable alternative option for upper lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, few studies have evaluated PETD for upper LDH, and no study has compared the advantages of endoscopic procedures versus conventional surgery. The present study was aimed at comparing the surgical outcome and safety of PETD versus conventional open lumbar discectomy in the treatment of upper LDH. Methods:Data from 42 patients treated for upper LDH from July 2015 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 21 patients treated with PETD (PETD group) and 21 patients treated with conventional posterior lumbar discectomy (open group). The two groups were compared regarding demographic information, physical examination, radiological evaluations, and perioperative indicators. The clinical outcomes were assessed in accordance with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and modified MacNab criteria. Results:The postoperative ODI and VAS scores were significantly improved in both groups compared with the preoperative baseline values (P < 0.001), and the satisfactory rate was 90.5% in both groups in accordance with the modified MacNab criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical outcomes and complication rate (P < 0.001), and the satisfactory rate was 90.5% in both groups in accordance with the modified MacNab criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical outcomes and complication rate (P < 0.001), and the satisfactory rate was 90.5% in both groups in accordance with the modified MacNab criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical outcomes and complication rate (. Conclusions:PETD has a similar outcome to the conventional surgical method for the treatment of upper LDH but provides the typical advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as reduced iatrogenic injury, minimal activity restrictions, and accelerated ambulation recovery postoperatively.

Dataset Information

Endoscopic thyroid lobectomy vs Conventional open thyroid lobectomy.

Publications

Endoscopic thyroid lobectomy vs Conventional open thyroid lobectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets