Dataset Information

Gene Expression Profiles in Children With Suspected Sepsis.

ABSTRACT:

Study objective

Sepsis recognition is a clinical challenge in children. We aim to determine whether peripheral blood gene expression profiles are associated with pathogen type and sepsis severity in children with suspected sepsis.

Methods

This was a prospective pilot observational study in a tertiary pediatric emergency department with a convenience sample of children enrolled. Participants were older than 56 days and younger than 18 years, had suspected sepsis, and had not received broad-spectrum antibiotics in the previous 4 hours. Primary outcome was source pathogen, defined as confirmed bacterial source from sterile body fluid or confirmed viral source. Secondary outcome was sepsis severity, defined as maximum therapy required for shock reversal in the first 3 hospital days. We drew peripheral blood for ribonucleic acid isolation at the sepsis protocol activation, obtained gene expression measures with the GeneChip Human Gene 2.0 ST Array, and conducted differential expression analysis.

Results

We collected ribonucleic acid samples from a convenience sample of 122 children with suspected sepsis and 12 healthy controls. We compared the 66 children (54%) with confirmed bacterial or viral infection and found 558 differentially expressed genes, many related to interferon signaling or viral immunity. We did not find statistically significant gene expression differences in patients according to sepsis severity.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates feasibility of evaluating gene expression profiling data in children evaluated for sepsis in the pediatric emergency department setting. Our results suggest that gene expression profiling may facilitate identification of source pathogen in children with suspected sepsis, which could ultimately lead to improved tailoring of sepsis treatment and antimicrobial stewardship.

SUBMITTER: Balamuth F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7261647 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with heterogeneity of clinical symptoms. Studies further exploring the molecular subtypes of sepsis and elucidating its probable mechanisms are urgently needed. Methods: Microarray datasets of peripheral blood in sepsis were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis was conducted to screen key module genes. Consensus clustering analysis was carried out to identify distinct sepsis molecular subtypes. Subtype-specific pathways were explored using gene set variation analysis (GSVA). Afterward, we intersected subtype-related, dramatically expressed and module-specific genes to screen consensus DEGs (co-DEGs). Enrichment analysis was carried out to identify key pathways. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used for screen potential diagnostic biomarkers. Results: Patients with sepsis were classified into three clusters. GSVA showed these DEGs among different clusters in sepsis were assigned to metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, autophagy regulation, and VEGF pathways, etc. In addition, we identified 40 co-DEGs and several dysregulated pathways. A diagnostic model with 25-gene signature was proven to be of high value for the diagnosis of sepsis. Genes in the diagnostic model with AUC values more than 0.95 in external datasets were screened as key genes for the diagnosis of sepsis. Finally, ANKRD22, GPR84, GYG1, BLOC1S1, CARD11, NOG, and LRG1 were recognized as critical genes associated with sepsis molecular subtypes. Conclusion: There are remarkable differences in and enriched pathways among different molecular subgroups of sepsis, which may be the key factors leading to heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and prognosis in patients with sepsis. Our current study provides novel diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for sepsis molecular subtypes.

Project description:Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease that is typically diagnosed in children. The aim of the present study was to identify potential genes involved in the pathogenesis of childhood T1D. Two datasets of mRNA expression in children with T1D were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in children with T1D were identified. Functional analysis was performed and a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed, as was a transcription factor (TF)‑target network. The expression of selected DEGs was further assessed using reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) analysis. Electronic validation and diagnostic value analysis of the identified DEGs [cytokine inducible SH2 containing protein (CISH), SR‑related CTD associated factor 11 (SCAF11), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), Rho GTPase activating protein 25 (ARHGAP25), major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR β4 (HLA‑DRB4) and interleukin 23 subunit α (IL23A)] was performed in the GEO dataset. Compared with the normal control group, a total of 1,467 DEGs with P<0.05 were identified in children with T1D. CISH and SCAF11 were determined to be the most up‑ and downregulated genes, respectively. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D (HNRNPD; degree=33), protein kinase AMP‑activated catalytic subunit α1 (PRKAA1; degree=11), integrin subunit α4 (ITGA4; degree=8) and ESR1 (degree=8) were identified in the PPI network as high‑degree genes. ARHGAP25 (degree=12), HNRNPD (degree=10), HLA‑DRB4 (degree=10) and IL23A (degree=9) were high‑degree genes identified in the TF‑target network. RT‑qPCR revealed that the expression of HNRNPD, PRKAA1, ITGA4 and transporter 2, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member was consistent with the results of the integrated analysis. Furthermore, the results of the electronic validation were consistent with the bioinformatics analysis. SCAF11, CISH and ARHGAP25 were identified to possess value as potential diagnostic markers for children with T1D. In conclusion, identifying DEGs in children with T1D may contribute to our understanding of its pathogenesis, and such DEGs may be used as diagnostic biomarkers for children with T1D.