Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Having your cake and eating it too: Flexibility and power with mass univariate statistics for ERP data.


ABSTRACT: ERP studies produce large spatiotemporal data sets. These rich data sets are key to enabling us to understand cognitive and neural processes. However, they also present a massive multiple comparisons problem, potentially leading to a large number of studies with false positive effects (a high Type I error rate). Standard approaches to ERP statistical analysis, which average over time windows and regions of interest, do not always control for Type I error, and their inflexibility can lead to low power to detect true effects. Mass univariate approaches offer an alternative analytic method. However, they have thus far been viewed as appropriate primarily for exploratory statistical analysis and only applicable to simple designs. Here, we present new simulation studies showing that permutation-based mass univariate tests can be employed with complex factorial designs. Most importantly, we show that mass univariate approaches provide slightly greater power than traditional spatiotemporal averaging approaches when strong a priori time windows and spatial regions are used. Moreover, their power decreases only modestly when more exploratory spatiotemporal parameters are used. We argue that mass univariate approaches are preferable to traditional spatiotemporal averaging analysis approaches for many ERP studies.

SUBMITTER: Fields EC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7269415 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Having your cake and eating it too: Flexibility and power with mass univariate statistics for ERP data.

Fields Eric C EC   Kuperberg Gina R GR  

Psychophysiology 20190827 2


ERP studies produce large spatiotemporal data sets. These rich data sets are key to enabling us to understand cognitive and neural processes. However, they also present a massive multiple comparisons problem, potentially leading to a large number of studies with false positive effects (a high Type I error rate). Standard approaches to ERP statistical analysis, which average over time windows and regions of interest, do not always control for Type I error, and their inflexibility can lead to low  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8339798 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7055369 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4981412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3816382 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7904669 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7242752 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6750869 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6454114 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5870605 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2818754 | biostudies-literature