Dataset Information

Pulmonary embolism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Decline in diagnostic procedures and incidence at a university hospital.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has focused medical attention on treating affected patients and protecting others from infection. However, concerns have been raised regarding the pandemic´s impact and associated containment measures (eg curfew, lockdown) on non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute medical diseases.

Objectives

To investigate changes in the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the period before the pandemic and reference periods in previous years.

Methods

In this single-center study, we explored all diagnostic imaging tests performed for suspected PE between weeks 1 and 17 of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Incidence of PE (ie, primary outcome) was analyzed. Secondary outcomes included number of imaging tests for suspected PE.

Results

Compared to weeks 1 to 11, 2020, an abrupt decline in PE diagnosis (mean weekly rate, 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-6.6 vs 1.8; 95% CI, 0.0-3.6) and imaging tests (mean weekly rate, 32.5; 95% CI, 27.5-37.6 vs. 17.3; 95% CI, 11.6-23.1) was observed from week 12, with beginning of the containment measures and public lockdown in Austria. Compared to weeks 12 to 17 of 2018 and 2019, PE incidence and imaging tests were similarly decreased from 5.3 (95% CI, 3.6-7.1) to 1.8 (95% CI, 0.0-3.6) and 31.5 (95% CI, 27.1-35.9) to 17.3 (95% CI, 11.6-23.1), respectively. The median simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) score of PE patients during the pandemic was higher than in all other PE patients (3; interquartile range, 1-3 vs 1; interquartile range, 0-2; P = .002).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on non-COVID-19-related acute diseases as shown by the decline in incidence of PE and imaging procedures for diagnostic workup. Further studies from other hospitals are needed to confirm our findings.

SUBMITTER: Nopp S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7276790 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: After the first COVID-19 infection wave, a constant increase of pulmonary embolism (PE) hospitalizations not linked with active PCR-confirmed COVID-19 was observed, but potential contributors to this observation are unclear. Therefore, we analyzed associations between changes in PE hospitalizations and (1) the incidence of non-COVID-19 pneumonia, (2) the use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), (3) volume depletion, and (4) preceding COVID-19 infection numbers in Germany. Methods: Claims data of Helios hospitals in Germany were used, and consecutive cases with a hospital admission between May 6 and December 15, 2020 (PE surplus period), were analyzed and compared to corresponding periods covering the same weeks in 2016-2019 (control period). We analyzed the number of PE cases in the target period with multivariable Poisson general linear mixed models (GLMM) including (a) cohorts of 2020 versus 2016-2019, (b) the number of cases with pneumonia, (c) CTPA, and (d) volume depletion and adjusted for age and sex. In order to associate the daily number of PE cases in 2020 with the number of preceding SARS-CoV-2 infections in Germany, we calculated the average number of daily infections (divided by 10,000) occurring between 14 up to 90 days with increasing window sizes before PE cases and modeled the data with Poisson regression. Results: There were 2,404 PE hospitalizations between May 6 and December 15, 2020, as opposed to 2,112-2,236 (total 8,717) in the corresponding 2016-2019 control periods (crude rate ratio [CRR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15, P < 0.01). With the use of multivariable Poisson GLMM adjusted for age, sex, and volume depletion, PE cases were significantly associated with the number of cases with pneumonia (CRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.10, P < 0.01) and with CTPA (CRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.09-1.10, P < 0.01). The increase of PE cases in 2020 compared with the control period remained significant (CRR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P < 0.01) when controlling for those factors. In the 2020 cohort, the number of preceding average daily COVID-19 infections was associated with increased PE case incidence in all investigated windows, i.e., including preceding infections from 14 to 90 days. The best model (log likelihood -576) was with a window size of 4 days, i.e., average COVID-19 infections 14-17 days before PE hospitalization had a risk of 1.20 (95% CI 1.12-1.29, P < 0.01). Conclusions: There is an increase in PE cases since early May 2020 compared to corresponding periods in 2016-2019. This surplus was significant even when controlling for changes in potential modulators such as demographics, volume depletion, non-COVID-19 pneumonia, CTPA use, and preceding COVID-19 infections. Future studies are needed (1) to investigate a potential causal link for increased risk of delayed PE with preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection and (2) to define optimal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in patients presenting with pneumonia and PE.