Dataset Information

Effect of red blood cell transfusion on the development of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is difficult to establish, because ROP may also be influenced by other factors. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the relationship between RBC transfusion and the development of ROP. METHODS:The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to September 1, 2019. Observational studies that reported the relationship between RBC transfusion and ROP after adjusting for other potential risk factors were included. The combined result was analyzed by a random effect model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were tested, and sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS:Of the 2628 identified records, 18 studies including 15072 preterm infants and 5620 cases of ROP were included. A random effect model was used and revealed that RBC transfusion was significantly associated with ROP (pooled OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.27-1.76), with moderate heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 44.2%). Subgroup analysis indicated that RBC transfusion was more closely related to ROP in the group with a gestational age (GA) ?32 weeks (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.29-2.43) but not in the groups with a GA ?34 weeks (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.85-2.18) or a GA <37 weeks (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.86-1.82). No obvious publication bias was found based on the funnel plot and Egger's test. Removing any single study did not significantly alter the combined result in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Our study revealed that RBC transfusion is an independent risk factor for the development of ROP, especially in younger preterm infants. However, there seemed to be no evidence to support an effect of RBC transfusion on ROP in older groups. Further studies addressing this issue in older preterm neonates are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Zhu Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7279893 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of red blood cell transfusion on the development of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhu Zhe Z Hua Xin X Yu Yong Y Zhu Pan P Hong Kairui K Ke Yefang Y

PloS one 20200608 6

<h4>Background</h4>The effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is difficult to establish, because ROP may also be influenced by other factors. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the relationship between RBC transfusion and the development of ROP.<h4>Methods</h4>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to September 1, 2019. Observational studies that reported ...[more]

PMID: 32512582

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe association between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies and health care-associated infection is not fully understood.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether RBC transfusion thresholds are associated with the risk of infection and whether risk is independent of leukocyte reduction.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Sytematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number register were searched through January 22, 2014.Study selectionRandomized clinical trials with restrictive vs liberal RBC transfusion strategies.Data extraction and synthesisTwenty-one randomized trials with 8735 patients met eligibility criteria, of which 18 trials (n = 7593 patients) contained sufficient information for meta-analyses. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used to report pooled risk ratios. Absolute risks of infection were calculated using the profile likelihood random-effects method.Main outcomes and measuresIncidence of health care-associated infection such as pneumonia, mediastinitis, wound infection, and sepsis.ResultsThe pooled risk of all serious infections was 11.8% (95% CI, 7.0%-16.7%) in the restrictive group and 16.9% (95% CI, 8.9%-25.4%) in the liberal group. The risk ratio (RR) for the association between transfusion strategies and serious infection was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95) with little heterogeneity (I2 = 0%; τ2 <.0001). The number needed to treat (NNT) with restrictive strategies to prevent serious infection was 38 (95% CI, 24-122). The risk of infection remained reduced with a restrictive strategy, even with leukocyte reduction (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]). For trials with a restrictive hemoglobin threshold of <7.0 g/dL, the RR was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.97) with NNT of 20 (95% CI, 12-133). With stratification by patient type, the RR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.91) in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.95) in patients presenting with sepsis. There were no significant differences in the incidence of infection by RBC threshold for patients with cardiac disease, the critically ill, those with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or for infants with low birth weight.Conclusions and relevanceAmong hospitalized patients, a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy was associated with a reduced risk of health care-associated infection compared with a liberal transfusion strategy. Implementing restrictive strategies may have the potential to lower the incidence of health care-associated infection.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of behaviour modification interventions to promote restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices. DESIGN:Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS:Seven electronic databases were searched to January 2018. Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies examining an intervention to modify healthcare providers' RBC transfusion practice in any healthcare setting were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES:The primary outcome was the proportion of patients transfused. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of inappropriate transfusions, RBC units transfused per patient, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), pretransfusion haemoglobin and healthcare costs. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and meta-regression was performed in cases of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS:Eighty-four low to moderate quality studies were included: 3 were RCTs and 81 were non-randomised studies. Thirty-one studies evaluated a single intervention, 44 examined a multimodal intervention. The comparator in all studies was standard of care or historical control. In 33 non-randomised studies, use of an intervention was associated with reduced odds of transfusion (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.71)), odds of inappropriate transfusion (OR 0.46 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.59)), RBC units/patient weighted mean difference (WMD: -0.50 units (95%?CI -0.85 to -0.16)), LOS (WMD: -1.14 days (95%?CI -2.12 to -0.16)) and pretransfusion haemoglobin (-0.28?g/dL (95%?CI -0.48 to -0.08)). There was no difference in odds of mortality (OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.02)). Protocol/algorithm and multimodal interventions were associated with the greatest decreases in the primary outcome. There was high heterogeneity among estimates and evidence for publication bias. CONCLUSIONS:The literature examining the impact of interventions on RBC transfusions is extensive, although most studies are non-randomised. Despite this, pooled analysis of 33 studies revealed improvement in the primary outcome. Future work needs to shift from asking, 'does it work?' to 'what works best and at what cost?' PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:CRD42015024757.

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the benefit and harm of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies to guide red blood cell transfusions.DesignSystematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials.Data sourcesCochrane central register of controlled trials, SilverPlatter Medline (1950 to date), SilverPlatter Embase (1980 to date), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to present). Reference lists of identified trials and other systematic reviews were assessed, and authors and experts in transfusion were contacted to identify additional trials.Trial selectionPublished and unpublished randomised clinical trials that evaluated a restrictive compared with a liberal transfusion strategy in adults or children, irrespective of language, blinding procedure, publication status, or sample size.Data extractionTwo authors independently screened titles and abstracts of trials identified, and relevant trials were evaluated in full text for eligibility. Two reviewers then independently extracted data on methods, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias from included trials. random effects models were used to estimate risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.Results31 trials totalling 9813 randomised patients were included. The proportion of patients receiving red blood cells (relative risk 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.63, 8923 patients, 24 trials) and the number of red blood cell units transfused (mean difference -1.43, 95% confidence interval -2.01 to -0.86) were lower with the restrictive compared with liberal transfusion strategies. Restrictive compared with liberal transfusion strategies were not associated with risk of death (0.86, 0.74 to 1.01, 5707 patients, nine lower risk of bias trials), overall morbidity (0.98, 0.85 to 1.12, 4517 patients, six lower risk of bias trials), or fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (1.28, 0.66 to 2.49, 4730 patients, seven lower risk of bias trials). Results were not affected by the inclusion of trials with unclear or high risk of bias. Using trial sequential analyses on mortality and myocardial infarction, the required information size was not reached, but a 15% relative risk reduction or increase in overall morbidity with restrictive transfusion strategies could be excluded.ConclusionsCompared with liberal strategies, restrictive transfusion strategies were associated with a reduction in the number of red blood cell units transfused and number of patients being transfused, but mortality, overall morbidity, and myocardial infarction seemed to be unaltered. Restrictive transfusion strategies are safe in most clinical settings. Liberal transfusion strategies have not been shown to convey any benefit to patients.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42013004272.

Dataset Information

Effect of red blood cell transfusion on the development of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

Effect of red blood cell transfusion on the development of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets