Dataset Information

Prognostic assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain for severe aortic valve stenosis.

ABSTRACT: Backgrounds:The relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS) is frequently associated with cardiac amyloidosis. Elderly patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) complicated by transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy have poor prognosis. Furthermore, deteriorated basal LS in AS patients has been reported to be associated with adverse outcome. We investigated the association between RASP and outcomes in patients with severe AS. Methods:We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction. RASP was assessed by both of semi-quantitative (sRASP) and quantitative (qRASP) methods. sRASP was defined as a deterioration of LS (?-10%) in ? 5 (of 6) basal segments, relative to preserved LS (<-15%) in at least 1 apical segment. qRASP was calculated using the following formula: average apical LS/(average basal LS + average mid-ventricle LS); qRASP ? 1 was defined as positive. Patients were followed up to determine outcomes, which included sudden cardiac death or unexpected admission due to heart failure, over a median of 1.9 years. Results:sRASP and qRASP were assessed in all patients, but 24 and 42 patients fulfilled the criteria for sRASP and qRASP, respectively. Both assessments were significantly associated with outcomes (n = 44; 28%). Furthermore, sRASP was significantly associated with outcome after adjusting for EuroSCORE, NYHA ? II, or global longitudinal strain. A model based on these covariates for predicting outcomes significantly improved by adding sRASP. Conclusion:RASP is observed in some patients with severe AS and provides additive prognostic information over conventional parameters.

SUBMITTER: Saito M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7280361 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain for severe aortic valve stenosis.

Saito Makoto M Imai Misaki M Wake Daisuke D Higaki Rieko R Nakao Yasuhisa Y Morioka Hiroe H Sumimoto Takumi T Inoue Katsuji K

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 20200608

<h4>Backgrounds</h4>The relative apical sparing pattern (RASP) of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS) is frequently associated with cardiac amyloidosis. Elderly patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) complicated by transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy have poor prognosis. Furthermore, deteriorated basal LS in AS patients has been reported to be associated with adverse outcome. We investigated the association between RASP and outcomes in patients with severe AS.<h4>Methods</h4>We ret ...[more]

PMID: 32529023

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCirculatory efficiency reflects the ratio between total left ventricular work and the work required for maintaining cardiovascular circulation. The effect of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) on left ventricular/circulatory mechanical power and efficiency is not yet fully understood. We aimed to quantify left ventricular (LV) efficiency in patients with severe AS before and after surgical AVR.MethodsCirculatory efficiency was computed from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging derived volumetric data, echocardiographic and clinical data in patients with severe AS (n?=?41) before and 4 months after AVR and in age and sex-matched healthy subjects (n?=?10).ResultsIn patients with AS circulatory efficiency was significantly decreased compared to healthy subjects (9?±?3% vs 12?±?2%; p?=?0.004). There were significant negative correlations between circulatory efficiency and LV myocardial mass (r?=?-?0.591, p?<?0.001), myocardial fibrosis volume (r?=?-?0.427, p?=?0.015), end systolic volume (r?=?-?0.609, p?<?0.001) and NT-proBNP (r?=?-?0.444, p?=?0.009) and significant positive correlation between circulatory efficiency and LV ejection fraction (r?=?0.704, p?<?0.001). After AVR, circulatory efficiency increased significantly in the total cohort (9?±?3 vs 13?±?5%; p?<?0.001). However, in 10/41 (24%) patients, circulatory efficiency remained below 10% after AVR and, thus, did not restore to normal values. These patients also showed less reduction in myocardial fibrosis volume compared to patients with restored circulatory efficiency after AVR.ConclusionIn our cohort, circulatory efficiency is reduced in patients with severe AS. In 76% of cases, AVR leads to normalization of circulatory efficiency. However, in 24% of patients, circulatory efficiency remained below normal values even after successful AVR. In these patients also less regression of myocardial fibrosis volume was seen. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03172338, June 1, 2017, retrospectively registered.

Project description:AimsSevere aortic valve stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2 or an AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) <0.6 cm/m2, despite little evidence supporting the latter approach and important intrinsic limitations of BSA indexation. We hypothesized that AVA indexed to height (H) might be more applicable to a wide range of populations and body morphologies and might provide a better predictive accuracy.Methods and resultsIn 1298 patients with degenerative AS and preserved ejection fraction from three different countries and continents (derivation cohort), we aimed to establish an AVA/H threshold that would be equivalent to 1.0 cm2 for defining severe AS. In a distinct prospective validation cohort of 395 patients, we compared the predictive accuracy of AVA/BSA and AVA/H. Correlations between AVA and AVA/BSA or AVA/H were excellent (all R2 > 0.79) but greater with AVA/H. Regressions lines were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients with AVA/BSA (P < 0.0001) but almost identical with AVA/H (P = 0.16). AVA/BSA values that corresponded to an AVA of 1.0 cm2 were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients (0.48 and 0.59 cm2/m2) but not with AVA/H (0.61 cm2/m for both). Agreement for the diagnosis of severe AS (AVA < 1 cm2) was significantly higher with AVA/H than with AVA/BSA (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed across the three countries. An AVA/H cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m [HR = 8.2(5.6-12.1)] provided the best predictive value for the occurrence of AS-related events [absolute AVA of 1 cm2: HR = 7.3(5.0-10.7); AVA/BSA of 0.6 cm2/m2 HR = 6.7(4.4-10.0)].ConclusionIn a large multinational/multiracial cohort, AVA/H was better correlated with AVA than AVA/BSA and a cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m provided a better diagnostic and prognostic value than 0.6 cm2/m2. Our results suggest that severe AS should be defined as an AVA < 1 cm2 or an AVA/H < 0.6 cm2/m rather than a BSA-indexed value of 0.6 cm2/m2.

Dataset Information

Prognostic assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain for severe aortic valve stenosis.

Publications

Prognostic assessment of relative apical sparing pattern of longitudinal strain for severe aortic valve stenosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets